Abstract
In the period 2017–2019, field experiments were conducted at the Research and Education Center Gorzyń, unit Złotniki (52°486′ N; 16°819′ E), Poznan University of Life Sciences, at the Luvisols, under natural weather conditions, to evaluate the effect of multifunctional methylated seed oil (EXP 1, 2, and 3) and standard adjuvants (AtB and S) on the efficacy of mixtures phenmedipham + ethofumesate and metamitron applied in full (PEM 1) and reduced rates (PEM 2) in sugar beet. Field studies were carried out and three applications of herbicides were administrated subsequent to the emergence of weeds (BBCH 11–12). PEM applied at reduced rates with EXP was more effective than after AtB and S adjuvants. They enabled the attainment of high and consistent efficacy of herbicides (with EXP—96–97%, AtB—97%, S—95%, compared to PEM 1—93%, and PEM 2—82%), irrespective of varying weather conditions during, and subsequent to, their application. The sugar beet root yield from herbicide treatments after tested adjuvants was higher than from the untreated control and after application of reduced rates of herbicides without adjuvants.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 3
Claim · model-written summary
PEM applied at reduced rates with the EXP adjuvant was more effective than with the AtB and S adjuvants.
- Taxon
- sugar beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise2 - Treatment
- PEM applied at reduced rates with EXPe1
- Interactor
- weedse3weed
- Outcome
- efficacy of herbicidese4
- Direction
- more effectivee1
- Comparator
- AtB and S adjuvantse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“PEM applied at reduced rates with EXP was more effective than after AtB and S adjuvants”
e2“reduced rates (PEM 2) in sugar beet”
e3“subsequent to the emergence of weeds”
e4“high and consistent efficacy of herbicides”
Claim · model-written summary
Herbicide efficacy with the EXP adjuvant was high (96–97%), compared with 82% for PEM 2.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise2
- Treatment
- EXPe5
- Outcome
- efficacy of herbicidese5
- Direction
- highe5
- Value
- 96–97%e5
- Qualifier
- 82%e5
- Comparator
- PEM 2e5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e2“reduced rates (PEM 2) in sugar beet”
e5“high and consistent efficacy of herbicides (with EXP—96–97%, AtB—97%, S—95%, compared to PEM 1—93%, and PEM 2—82%)”
Claim · model-written summary
Sugar beet root yield after herbicide treatments with the tested adjuvants was higher than in the untreated control and than after reduced herbicide rates without adjuvants.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise6
- Treatment
- herbicide treatments after tested adjuvantse6
- Outcome
- sugar beet root yielde6
- Direction
- highere6
- Qualifier
- reduced rates of herbicides without adjuvantse6
- Comparator
- untreated controle6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e6“The sugar beet root yield from herbicide treatments after tested adjuvants was higher than from the untreated control and after application of reduced rates of herbicides without adjuvants”
The same questions in other papers
adjuvant · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
herbicide · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- negative
50 papers more in this group
See all 54 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.