Paper · 2023 · Plants

Light Intensity Affects the Assimilation Rate and Carbohydrates Partitioning in Spinach Grown in a Controlled Environment

Simona Proietti; Roberta Paradiso; Stefano Moscatello; et al.

7
claims
19
verbatim quotes
52
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The cultivation of spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) has been increasing during the last years in controlled environment agriculture, where light represents a key factor for controlling plant growth and development and the highest energetic costs. The aim of the experiment was to evaluate the plant’s response to two light intensities, corresponding to an optimal and a reduced level, in terms of the photosynthetic process, photoassimilates partitioning, and the biosynthesis of sucrose and starch. Plants of spinach cv. ‘Gigante d’Inverno’ were grown in a phytotron under controlled conditions, comparing two values of photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD), 800 μmol m−2 s−1 (800 PPFD) and 200 μmol m−2 s−1 (200 PPFD), at a 10 h light/14 h dark regime. Compared to 800 PPFD, under 200 PPFD, plants showed a reduction in biomass accumulation and a redirection of photoassimilates to leaves, determining a leaf expansion to optimize the light interception, without changes in the photosynthetic process. A shift in carbon partitioning favouring the synthesis of starch, causing an increase in the starch/sucrose ratio at the end of light period, occurred in low-light leaves. The activity of enzymes cFBAse, SPS, and AGPase, involved in the synthesis of sucrose and starch in leaves, decreased under lower light intensity, explaining the rate of accumulation of photoassimilates.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower light reduced spinach biomass accumulation.

Material
Gigante d’Invernot1
Treatment
200 PPFDe0
Outcome
biomass accumulatione0
Direction
reductione0
Comparator
800 PPFDe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to 800 PPFD, under 200 PPFD, plants showed a reduction in biomass accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–844 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–87 · show in text ↑
t1

“Gigante d’Inverno”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–538 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower light redirected photoassimilates to spinach leaves.

Treatment
200 PPFDe0
Outcome
redirection of photoassimilates to leavese0
Comparator
800 PPFDt1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under 200 PPFD, plants showed a reduction in biomass accumulation and a redirection of photoassimilates to leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 779–892 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–87 · show in text ↑
t1

“Compared to 800 PPFD, under 200 PPFD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–793 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower light caused spinach leaf expansion.

Treatment
200 PPFDt1
Outcome
leaf expansione0
Comparator
800 PPFDt1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“determining a leaf expansion to optimize the light interception”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–957 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–87 · show in text ↑
t1

“800 μmol m−2 s−1 (800 PPFD) and 200 μmol m−2 s−1 (200 PPFD)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–721 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The spinach photosynthetic process did not change under lower light.

Treatment
200 PPFDt1
Outcome
photosynthetic processe0
Direction
without changese0
Comparator
800 PPFDt1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“without changes in the photosynthetic process.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1005 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–87 · show in text ↑
t1

“800 μmol m−2 s−1 (800 PPFD) and 200 μmol m−2 s−1 (200 PPFD)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–721 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low light shifted spinach carbon partitioning toward starch synthesis.

Treatment
low-lighte1
Outcome
carbon partitioning favouring the synthesis of starche0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A shift in carbon partitioning favouring the synthesis of starch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1006–1070 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–87 · show in text ↑
e1

“low-light leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1160–1176 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low-light leaves had an increased starch/sucrose ratio at the end of the light period.

Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
low-lighte0
Outcome
starch/sucrose ratioe0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
at the end of light periode0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“causing an increase in the starch/sucrose ratio at the end of light period, occurred in low-light leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1177 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower light decreased cFBAse, SPS and AGPase activity in spinach leaves.

Treatment
lower light intensitye0
Gene
cFBAse, SPS, and AGPasee0
Outcome
activity of enzymes cFBAse, SPS, and AGPasee0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The activity of enzymes cFBAse, SPS, and AGPase, involved in the synthesis of sucrose and starch in leaves, decreased under lower light intensity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1178–1323 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–87 · show in text ↑

light · physiology: enzyme activity · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.