Paper · 2023 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Biochemical repercussions of light spectra on nitrogen metabolism in spinach (Spinacia oleracea) under a controlled environment

Moazzameh Ramezani; Dalton Thompson; Matte Moreno; et al.

9
claims
14
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Introduction: Selecting appropriate light spectra of light-emitting diodes (LEDs) and optimal nutrient composition fertilizers has become integral to commercial controlled environment agriculture (CEA) platforms. Methods: ). Results: Under limited nitrogen (3.6 mM), BGR light increased the fresh shoot (32%) and root (39%) biomass than BR, suggesting additional green light's impact on assimilating photosynthates under suboptimal nitrogen availability. Reduced chlorophyll (a and b) and carotenoid accumulation, electron transport rate (ETR), and higher oxalates under limited nitrogen availability highlighted the adverse effects of red light (BR) on spinach productivity. Increased activities of nitrogen-associated enzymes (GOGAT; Glutamate synthase, GDH; NADH-Glutamate dehydrogenase, NR; Nitrate reductase, and GS; Glutamine synthetase) in spinach plants under BGR light further validated the significance of green light in nitrogen assimilation. Amino acid distributions remained unchanged across the light spectra, although limited nitrogen availability significantly decreased the percent distribution of glutamine and aspartic acid. Conclusion: Overall, this study demonstrated the favorable impacts of additional green light on spinach productivity, as demonstrated under BGR, than GR alone in response to nitrogen perturbation. However, the exact mechanisms underlying these impacts still need to be unveiled. Nevertheless, these outcomes provided new insights into our understanding of light spectra on spinach nitrogen metabolism.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under limited nitrogen BGR light increased shoot biomass 32% relative to BR.

Treatment
BGR lighte0
Outcome
fresh shoote0
Direction
increasede0
Value
32%e0
Qualifier
limited nitrogen (3.6 mM)e0
Comparator
BRe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under limited nitrogen (3.6 mM), BGR light increased the fresh shoot (32%) and root (39%) biomass than BR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 234–339 · show in text ↑
t0

“spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under limited nitrogen BGR light increased root biomass 39% relative to BR.

Treatment
BGR lighte0
Outcome
roote0
Direction
increasede0
Value
39%e0
Qualifier
limited nitrogen (3.6 mM)e0
Comparator
BRe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under limited nitrogen (3.6 mM), BGR light increased the fresh shoot (32%) and root (39%) biomass than BR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 234–339 · show in text ↑
t0

“spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under limited nitrogen BR light reduced chlorophyll a and b and carotenoid accumulation.

Treatment
red light (BR)e0
Outcome
chlorophyll (a and b) and carotenoid accumulatione0
Direction
Reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Reduced chlorophyll (a and b) and carotenoid accumulation, electron transport rate (ETR), and higher oxalates under limited nitrogen availability highlighted the adverse effects of red light (BR) on spinach productivity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 455–675 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under limited nitrogen BR light reduced electron transport rate.

Treatment
red light (BR)e0
Outcome
electron transport rate (ETR)e0
Direction
Reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Reduced chlorophyll (a and b) and carotenoid accumulation, electron transport rate (ETR), and higher oxalates under limited nitrogen availability highlighted the adverse effects of red light (BR) on spinach productivity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 455–675 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under limited nitrogen BR light was associated with higher oxalates.

Treatment
red light (BR)e0
Outcome
oxalatese0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Reduced chlorophyll (a and b) and carotenoid accumulation, electron transport rate (ETR), and higher oxalates under limited nitrogen availability highlighted the adverse effects of red light (BR) on spinach productivity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 455–675 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BGR light increased nitrogen-associated enzyme activities.

Treatment
BGR lighte0
Outcome
activities of nitrogen-associated enzymese0
Direction
Increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increased activities of nitrogen-associated enzymes (GOGAT; Glutamate synthase, GDH; NADH-Glutamate dehydrogenase, NR; Nitrate reductase, and GS; Glutamine synthetase) in spinach plants under BGR light”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–877 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Amino acid distributions remained unchanged across light spectra.

Treatment
light spectrae0
Outcome
Amino acid distributionse0
Direction
remained unchangede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Amino acid distributions remained unchanged across the light spectra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 954–1022 · show in text ↑
t0

“spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Limited nitrogen decreased glutamine distribution.

Treatment
limited nitrogen availabilitye0
Outcome
percent distribution of glutaminee0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“limited nitrogen availability significantly decreased the percent distribution of glutamine and aspartic acid.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1033–1143 · show in text ↑
t0

“spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Limited nitrogen decreased aspartic acid distribution.

Treatment
limited nitrogen availabilitye0
Outcome
aspartic acide0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“limited nitrogen availability significantly decreased the percent distribution of glutamine and aspartic acid.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1033–1143 · show in text ↑
t0

“spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–76 · show in text ↑

light · physiology: enzyme activity · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

light · physiology: pigments · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 2 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

nitrogen · molecular: metabolites · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 14 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

light · physiology: photosynthesis · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 15 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

light · molecular: metabolites · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 16 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

light · growth · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 23 positive, 11 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. negative

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.