Paper · 2023 · Frontiers in Pharmacology

UHPLC-MS profiles and antidiarrheal activity of Quercus coccinea münchh. and Quercus robur L. employing in vivo technique

Mohamed S. Mady; Reham R. Ibrahim; Elsayed K. El-Sayed; et al.

12
claims
37
verbatim quotes
12
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Introduction: Quercus L. genus (Oak) belongs to the family Fagaceae and their galls are used commercially in leather tanning, dyeing, and ink preparation. Several Quercus species were traditionally used to manage wound healing, acute diarrhea, hemorrhoid, and inflammatory diseases. The present study aims to investigate the phenolic content of the 80% aqueous methanol extract (AME) of Q. coccinea and Q. robur leaves as well as to assess their anti-diarrheal activity. Methods: Polyphenolic content of Q. coccinea and Q. robur AME were investigated using UHPLC/MS. The antidiarrheal potential of the obtained extracts was evaluated by conducting a castor oil-induced diarrhea in-vivo model. Result and Discussion: Twenty-five and twenty-six polyphenolic compounds were tentatively identified in Q. coccinea and Q. robur AME, respectively. The identified compounds are related to quercetin, kaempferol, isorhamnetin, and apigenin glycosides and their aglycones. In addition, hydrolyzable tannins, phenolic acid, phenyl propanoides derivatives, and cucurbitacin F were also identified in both species AME of Q. coccinea (250, 500, and 1000 mg/kg) exhibited a significant prolongation in the onset of diarrhea by 17.7 %, 42.6%, and 79.7% respectively while AME of Q. robur at the same doses significantly prolonged the onset of diarrhea by 38.6%, 77.3%, and 2.4 folds respectively as compared to the control. Moreover, the percentage of diarrheal inhibition of Q. coccinea was 23.8%, 28.57%, and 42,86% respectively, and for Q. robur 33.34%, 47.3%, and 57.14% respectively as compared to the control group. Both extracts significantly decreased the volume of intestinal fluid by 27%, 39.78%, and 50.1% for Q. coccinea respectively; and by 38.71%, 51.19%, and 60% for Q. robur respectively as compared to the control group. In addition, AME of Q. coccinea exhibited a peristaltic index of 53.48, 47.18, and 42.28 with significant inhibition of gastrointestinal transit by 18.98%, 28.53%, and 35.95 % respectively; while AME of Q. robur exhibited a peristaltic index of 47.71, 37, and 26.41 with significant inhibition of gastrointestinal transit by 27.72%, 43.89%, and 59.99% respectively as compared with the control group. Notably, Q. robur showed a better antidiarrheal effect in comparison with Q. coccinea and, the highest effect was observed for Q. robur at 1000 mg/kg as it was nonsignificant from the loperamide standard group in all measured parameters.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Twenty-five polyphenolic compounds were tentatively identified in Quercus coccinea leaf extract.

Taxon
Quercus coccineaQuercus coccineat0
Outcome
polyphenolic compoundse1
Value
Twenty-fivee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Quercus coccinea
Quercus coccinea · TaxonJay Sturner from USA · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Quercus coccinea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–64 · show in text ↑
e1

“Twenty-five and twenty-six polyphenolic compounds were tentatively identified in Q. coccinea and Q. robur AME”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 716–825 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Twenty-six polyphenolic compounds were tentatively identified in Quercus robur leaf extract.

Taxon
Quercus roburQuercus roburt1
Outcome
polyphenolic compoundse1
Value
twenty-sixe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Quercus robur
Quercus robur · TaxonAlgirdas at Lithuanian Wikipedia · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“Quercus robur”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–90 · show in text ↑
e1

“Twenty-five and twenty-six polyphenolic compounds were tentatively identified in Q. coccinea and Q. robur AME”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 716–825 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Quercus coccinea extract at 250, 500 and 1000 mg/kg significantly prolonged the onset of castor oil-induced diarrhea compared with control.

Taxon
Q. coccineaQuercus coccineae2
Treatment
AME of Q. coccinea (250, 500, and 1000 mg/kg)e2
Outcome
onset of diarrheae2
Direction
prolongatione2
Value
17.7 %, 42.6%, and 79.7%e2
Comparator
controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Quercus coccinea
Quercus coccinea · TaxonJay Sturner from USA · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Quercus coccinea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–64 · show in text ↑
e2

“AME of Q. coccinea (250, 500, and 1000 mg/kg) exhibited a significant prolongation in the onset of diarrhea by 17.7 %, 42.6%, and 79.7% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1101–1249 · show in text ↑
e3

“by 38.6%, 77.3%, and 2.4 folds respectively as compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1336–1406 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Quercus robur extract at 250, 500 and 1000 mg/kg significantly prolonged the onset of castor oil-induced diarrhea compared with control.

Taxon
Q. roburQuercus robure4
Treatment
AME of Q. robur at the same dosese4
Outcome
onset of diarrheae4
Direction
prolongede4
Value
38.6%, 77.3%, and 2.4 foldse4
Comparator
controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Quercus robur
Quercus robur · TaxonAlgirdas at Lithuanian Wikipedia · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“Quercus robur”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–90 · show in text ↑
e3

“by 38.6%, 77.3%, and 2.4 folds respectively as compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1336–1406 · show in text ↑
e4

“AME of Q. robur at the same doses significantly prolonged the onset of diarrhea by 38.6%, 77.3%, and 2.4 folds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1256–1366 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Quercus coccinea extract increased the percentage of diarrheal inhibition relative to control.

Taxon
Q. coccineaQuercus coccineae5
Treatment
AME of Q. coccinea (250, 500, and 1000 mg/kg)e2
Outcome
percentage of diarrheal inhibitione5
Direction
increaseinferrede5
Value
23.8%, 28.57%, and 42,86%e5
Comparator
control groupe6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Quercus coccinea
Quercus coccinea · TaxonJay Sturner from USA · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Quercus coccinea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–64 · show in text ↑
e2

“AME of Q. coccinea (250, 500, and 1000 mg/kg) exhibited a significant prolongation in the onset of diarrhea by 17.7 %, 42.6%, and 79.7% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1101–1249 · show in text ↑
e5

“Moreover, the percentage of diarrheal inhibition of Q. coccinea was 23.8%, 28.57%, and 42,86% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1408–1514 · show in text ↑
e6

“and for Q. robur 33.34%, 47.3%, and 57.14% respectively as compared to the control group”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1516–1604 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Quercus robur extract increased the percentage of diarrheal inhibition relative to control.

Taxon
Q. roburQuercus robure6
Treatment
AME of Q. robur at the same dosese4
Outcome
percentage of diarrheal inhibitione5
Direction
increaseinferrede6
Value
33.34%, 47.3%, and 57.14%e6
Comparator
control groupe6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Quercus robur
Quercus robur · TaxonAlgirdas at Lithuanian Wikipedia · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“Quercus robur”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–90 · show in text ↑
e4

“AME of Q. robur at the same doses significantly prolonged the onset of diarrhea by 38.6%, 77.3%, and 2.4 folds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1256–1366 · show in text ↑
e5

“Moreover, the percentage of diarrheal inhibition of Q. coccinea was 23.8%, 28.57%, and 42,86% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1408–1514 · show in text ↑
e6

“and for Q. robur 33.34%, 47.3%, and 57.14% respectively as compared to the control group”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1516–1604 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Quercus coccinea extract decreased the volume of intestinal fluid relative to control.

Taxon
Q. coccineaQuercus coccineae7
Treatment
AME of Q. coccinea (250, 500, and 1000 mg/kg)e2
Outcome
volume of intestinal fluide7
Direction
decreasede7
Value
27%, 39.78%, and 50.1%e7
Comparator
control groupe6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Quercus coccinea
Quercus coccinea · TaxonJay Sturner from USA · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Quercus coccinea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–64 · show in text ↑
e2

“AME of Q. coccinea (250, 500, and 1000 mg/kg) exhibited a significant prolongation in the onset of diarrhea by 17.7 %, 42.6%, and 79.7% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1101–1249 · show in text ↑
e6

“and for Q. robur 33.34%, 47.3%, and 57.14% respectively as compared to the control group”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1516–1604 · show in text ↑
e7

“Both extracts significantly decreased the volume of intestinal fluid by 27%, 39.78%, and 50.1% for Q. coccinea respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1606–1729 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Quercus robur extract decreased the volume of intestinal fluid relative to control.

Taxon
Q. roburQuercus robure4
Treatment
AME of Q. robur at the same dosese1
Outcome
volume of intestinal fluide3
Direction
decreasede3
Value
38.71%, 51.19%, and 60%e4
Comparator
control groupe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Quercus robur
Quercus robur · TaxonAlgirdas at Lithuanian Wikipedia · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“Quercus robur”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–90 · show in text ↑
e1

“AME of Q. robur at the same doses significantly prolonged the onset of diarrhea by 38.6%, 77.3%, and 2.4 folds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1256–1366 · show in text ↑
e2

“and for Q. robur 33.34%, 47.3%, and 57.14% respectively as compared to the control group”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1516–1604 · show in text ↑
e3

“Both extracts significantly decreased the volume of intestinal fluid by 27%, 39.78%, and 50.1% for Q. coccinea respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1606–1729 · show in text ↑
e4

“by 38.71%, 51.19%, and 60% for Q. robur respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1735–1787 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Quercus coccinea extract inhibited gastrointestinal transit relative to control.

Taxon
Q. coccineaQuercus coccineae1
Treatment
AME of Q. coccineae1
Outcome
gastrointestinal transite1
Direction
inhibitione1
Value
18.98%, 28.53%, and 35.95 %e1
Comparator
control groupe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Quercus coccinea
Quercus coccinea · TaxonJay Sturner from USA · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Quercus coccinea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–64 · show in text ↑
e1

“AME of Q. coccinea exhibited a peristaltic index of 53.48, 47.18, and 42.28 with significant inhibition of gastrointestinal transit by 18.98%, 28.53%, and 35.95 % respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1835–2010 · show in text ↑
e2

“respectively as compared with the control group”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2174–2221 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Quercus robur extract inhibited gastrointestinal transit relative to control.

Taxon
Q. roburQuercus robure1
Treatment
AME of Q. robure1
Outcome
gastrointestinal transite1
Direction
inhibitione1
Value
27.72%, 43.89%, and 59.99%e1
Comparator
control groupe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Quercus robur
Quercus robur · TaxonAlgirdas at Lithuanian Wikipedia · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“Quercus robur”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–90 · show in text ↑
e1

“AME of Q. robur exhibited a peristaltic index of 47.71, 37, and 26.41 with significant inhibition of gastrointestinal transit by 27.72%, 43.89%, and 59.99%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2018–2173 · show in text ↑
e2

“respectively as compared with the control group”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2174–2221 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Quercus robur showed a better antidiarrheal effect than Quercus coccinea.

Taxon
Q. roburQuercus robure1
Outcome
antidiarrheal effecte1
Direction
bettere1
Comparator
Q. coccineae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Quercus robur
Quercus robur · TaxonAlgirdas at Lithuanian Wikipedia · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“Quercus robur”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–90 · show in text ↑
e1

“Notably, Q. robur showed a better antidiarrheal effect in comparison with Q. coccinea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2223–2308 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Quercus robur at 1000 mg/kg was not significantly different from the loperamide standard in all measured parameters.

Taxon
Q. roburQuercus robure1
Treatment
at 1000 mg/kge1
Outcome
measured parameterse1
Direction
nonsignificante1
Comparator
loperamide standard groupe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Quercus robur
Quercus robur · TaxonAlgirdas at Lithuanian Wikipedia · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“Quercus robur”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–90 · show in text ↑
e1

“the highest effect was observed for Q. robur at 1000 mg/kg as it was nonsignificant from the loperamide standard group in all measured parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2314–2459 · show in text ↑