Abstract
A field investigation on “Soybean response to contrasting tillage and nutrient management under vertisolic soil” to study the impact of tillage and nutrient management on soybean and to assess the physicochemical properties of soil under vertisolic soil. The trial was conducted at the Department of Agronomy, Dr. PDKV, Akola during 2019-20. The experiment was laid out in split plot design with five main plot and three sub plot treatments replicated for three times. The main plot treatments were constituted of five tillage practices viz. (1) Conservation tillage (CnT), Minimum tillage (MT), Subsoil tillage (ST), Roto Tillage (RT) and Conventional Tillage (CvT). Sub plot treatments were comprised of three nutrient management i.e.100% RDF (100 RDF), 75% RDF + 2 t ha-1 FYM (75RDF) and 50% RDF + 4 t ha-1 FYM (50RDF). The other cultural practices were kept common, as recommended. Results shows that, on a clayey soil with subsoil tillage exhibited better growth and yield attributes and recorded significantly higher seed yield. Nutrient management with 100% RDF (30:75:30 NPK kg/ha), being comparable to 75RDF, resulted in higher growth and yield attributes and seed yield of soybean whereas 50%RDF + 4 t ha-1 FYM. Improvement in soil physical properties viz., soil moisture content, porosity, mean weight diameter, rate of infiltration, Hydraulic conductivity was observed with subsoil tillage practice and 50RDF integrated nutrient management practices. Significantly higher gross monetary returns and net monetary returns along with maximum benefit: cost ratio were obtained with subsoil tillage. Application of 100% RDF recorded significantly higher gross monetary returns and net monetary returns along with maximum benefit: cost ratio. In terms of energetic values, subsoil tillage practice and nutrient management with 100% RDF recorded higher energy output and energy balance, however conservation tillage practice recorded maximum energy balance per unit input and higher energy output: input ratio.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 15
Claim · model-written summary
Subsoil tillage on clayey soil gave better growth and yield attributes of soybean.
- Taxon
- Soybean
Glycine maxt0 - Treatment
- subsoil tillagee1
- Outcome
- growth and yield attributese1
- Direction
- bettere1
- Setting
- clayey soile1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Soybean response to contrasting tillage”
e1“on a clayey soil with subsoil tillage exhibited better growth and yield attributes”
Claim · model-written summary
Subsoil tillage on clayey soil significantly increased seed yield of soybean.
- Taxon
- SoybeanGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- subsoil tillagee2
- Outcome
- seed yielde2
- Direction
- highere2
- Setting
- clayey soile2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Soybean response to contrasting tillage”
e2“on a clayey soil with subsoil tillage exhibited better growth and yield attributes and recorded significantly higher seed yield”
Claim · model-written summary
100% RDF (30:75:30 NPK kg/ha), comparable to 75RDF, gave higher growth and yield attributes and seed yield of soybean.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxe2
- Treatment
- 100% RDF (30:75:30 NPK kg/ha)e2
- Outcome
- growth and yield attributes and seed yielde2
- Direction
- highere2
- Qualifier
- being comparable to 75RDFe2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Soybean response to contrasting tillage”
e2“Nutrient management with 100% RDF (30:75:30 NPK kg/ha), being comparable to 75RDF, resulted in higher growth and yield attributes and seed yield of soybean”
Claim · model-written summary
Subsoil tillage improved soil moisture content, porosity and mean weight diameter.
- Taxon
- SoybeanGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- subsoil tillage practicee3
- Outcome
- soil moisture content, porosity, mean weight diametere3
- Direction
- Improvement ine3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Soybean response to contrasting tillage”
e3“Improvement in soil physical properties viz., soil moisture content, porosity, mean weight diameter, rate of infiltration, Hydraulic conductivity was observed with subsoil tillage practice and 50RDF integrated nutrient management practices”
Claim · model-written summary
Subsoil tillage improved rate of infiltration and hydraulic conductivity.
- Taxon
- SoybeanGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- subsoil tillage practicee3
- Outcome
- rate of infiltration, Hydraulic conductivitye3
- Direction
- Improvement ine3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Soybean response to contrasting tillage”
e3“Improvement in soil physical properties viz., soil moisture content, porosity, mean weight diameter, rate of infiltration, Hydraulic conductivity was observed with subsoil tillage practice and 50RDF integrated nutrient management practices”
Claim · model-written summary
50RDF integrated nutrient management improved soil moisture content, porosity and mean weight diameter.
- Taxon
- SoybeanGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- 50RDF integrated nutrient management practicese3
- Outcome
- soil moisture content, porosity, mean weight diametere3
- Direction
- Improvement ine3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Soybean response to contrasting tillage”
e3“Improvement in soil physical properties viz., soil moisture content, porosity, mean weight diameter, rate of infiltration, Hydraulic conductivity was observed with subsoil tillage practice and 50RDF integrated nutrient management practices”
Claim · model-written summary
50RDF integrated nutrient management improved rate of infiltration and hydraulic conductivity.
- Taxon
- SoybeanGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- 50RDF integrated nutrient management practicese3
- Outcome
- rate of infiltration, Hydraulic conductivitye3
- Direction
- Improvement ine3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Soybean response to contrasting tillage”
e3“Improvement in soil physical properties viz., soil moisture content, porosity, mean weight diameter, rate of infiltration, Hydraulic conductivity was observed with subsoil tillage practice and 50RDF integrated nutrient management practices”
Claim · model-written summary
Subsoil tillage gave significantly higher gross and net monetary returns from soybean.
- Taxon
- SoybeanGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- subsoil tillagee4
- Outcome
- gross monetary returns and net monetary returnse4
- Direction
- highere4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Soybean response to contrasting tillage”
e4“Significantly higher gross monetary returns and net monetary returns along with maximum benefit: cost ratio were obtained with subsoil tillage”
Claim · model-written summary
Subsoil tillage gave the maximum benefit: cost ratio in soybean.
- Taxon
- SoybeanGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- subsoil tillagee4
- Outcome
- benefit: cost ratioe4
- Direction
- maximume4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Soybean response to contrasting tillage”
e4“Significantly higher gross monetary returns and net monetary returns along with maximum benefit: cost ratio were obtained with subsoil tillage”
Claim · model-written summary
100% RDF gave significantly higher gross and net monetary returns from soybean.
- Taxon
- SoybeanGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- 100% RDFe5
- Outcome
- gross monetary returns and net monetary returnse5
- Direction
- highere5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Soybean response to contrasting tillage”
e5“Application of 100% RDF recorded significantly higher gross monetary returns and net monetary returns along with maximum benefit: cost ratio”
Claim · model-written summary
100% RDF gave the maximum benefit: cost ratio in soybean.
- Taxon
- SoybeanGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- 100% RDFe5
- Outcome
- benefit: cost ratioe5
- Direction
- maximume5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Soybean response to contrasting tillage”
e5“Application of 100% RDF recorded significantly higher gross monetary returns and net monetary returns along with maximum benefit: cost ratio”
Claim · model-written summary
Subsoil tillage gave higher energy output and energy balance in soybean.
- Taxon
- SoybeanGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- subsoil tillage practicee6
- Outcome
- energy output and energy balancee6
- Direction
- highere6
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Soybean response to contrasting tillage”
e6“subsoil tillage practice and nutrient management with 100% RDF recorded higher energy output and energy balance”
Claim · model-written summary
Nutrient management with 100% RDF gave higher energy output and energy balance in soybean.
- Taxon
- SoybeanGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- nutrient management with 100% RDFe6
- Outcome
- energy output and energy balancee6
- Direction
- highere6
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Soybean response to contrasting tillage”
e6“subsoil tillage practice and nutrient management with 100% RDF recorded higher energy output and energy balance”
Claim · model-written summary
Conservation tillage gave the maximum energy balance per unit input in soybean.
- Taxon
- SoybeanGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- conservation tillage practicee7
- Outcome
- energy balance per unit inpute7
- Direction
- maximume7
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Soybean response to contrasting tillage”
e7“however conservation tillage practice recorded maximum energy balance per unit input and higher energy output: input ratio”
Claim · model-written summary
Conservation tillage gave higher energy output:input ratio in soybean.
- Taxon
- SoybeanGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- conservation tillage practicee7
- Outcome
- energy output: input ratioe7
- Direction
- highere7
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Soybean response to contrasting tillage”
e7“however conservation tillage practice recorded maximum energy balance per unit input and higher energy output: input ratio”
The same questions in other papers
tillage · quality: grain · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →fertilization · soil: physics · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- positive
15 papers more in this group
See all 19 papers →fertilization · quality: grain · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
20 papers more in this group
See all 24 papers →tillage · soil: physics · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
32 papers more in this group
See all 36 papers →tillage · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
263 papers in the same direction as this paper · 100 in the opposite direction · 26 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- no effect
386 papers more in this group
See all 390 papers →fertilization · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
1,020 papers in the same direction as this paper · 155 in the opposite direction · 16 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- no effect
1,188 papers more in this group
See all 1,192 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.