Paper · 2023 · European Scientific Journal ESJ

Effects of Slag-Based Fertilizer to Mitigate Salinity Stress on Greenhouse Durum Wheat (Triticum Durum Desf.) Cultivars

Farid Errouh; Abdelhamid Aouabe; Ayoub Sadouki; et al.

10
claims
27
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

For a modern agricultural, the search for sustainable practices to increase productivity is fundamental. Steel slag have been studied for their potential use in agriculture. These substances present a great possibility of agricultural applications since they are rich in nutrients, which enhance plant uptake. In this regard, the effect of steel slag based-fertilizer was investigated in the greenhouse durum wheat cultivation in pots under salt-stress conditions. Two slag doses: 10 g slag/ kg soil (D1) and 20 g slag/ kg soil (D2) were evaluated under no salt-stress (0 mM NaCl) and salt-stress conditions (100 mM NaCl) for salinity stress mitigation. Morpho-physiological and biochemical parameters of wheat were measured and compared to the different treatments. Wheat exposure to salinity decreased its biomass, stomatal conductance, efficiency of photosystem II, protein content and increased total soluble sugars, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and malondialdehyde (MDA) contents. Amended plants with 10 g slag/ kg soil (D1), led to a significant improve in biomass with an increase of shoot and root dry weights (133% and 400% respectively), stomatal conductance (22 %), soluble sugars (14 %) and protein content (158%) under salinity conditions as compared to the control treatment 0 g slag/ kg soil (C), indicating a positive influence on durum wheat plants. However, soil enrichment with 20 g slag/ kg soil (D2) decreased plant growth parameters and presented the highest levels of H2O2 and MDA contents compared to the control and treatment D1 after three months of cultivation under salt-stress. This study supports the hypothesis of the application of slag at lower dose improve productivity of durum wheat and mitigate salinity stress.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity decreased wheat biomass, stomatal conductance, photosystem II efficiency and protein content.

Treatment
exposure to salinitye0
Outcome
biomass, stomatal conductance, efficiency of photosystem II, protein contente0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat exposure to salinity decreased its biomass, stomatal conductance, efficiency of photosystem II, protein content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–884 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wheat exposure to salinity decreased its biomass, stomatal conductance, efficiency of photosystem II, protein content and increased total soluble sugars, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and malondialdehyde (MDA) contents. Amended plants with 10 g slag/ kg soil (D1), led to a significant improve in biomass with an increase of shoot and root dry weights (133% and 400% respectively), stomatal conductance (22 %), soluble sugars (14 %) and protein content (158%) under salinity conditions as compared to the control treatment 0 g slag/ kg soil (C), indicating a positive influence on durum wheat plants. However, soil enrichment with 20 g slag/ kg soil (D2) decreased plant growth parameters and presented the highest levels of H2O2 and MDA contents compared to the control and treatment D1 after three months of cultivation under salt-stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–1602 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity increased total soluble sugars, hydrogen peroxide and malondialdehyde.

Treatment
exposure to salinitye1
Outcome
total soluble sugars, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and malondialdehyde (MDA) contentse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased total soluble sugars, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and malondialdehyde (MDA) contents.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 889–981 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wheat exposure to salinity decreased its biomass, stomatal conductance, efficiency of photosystem II, protein content and increased total soluble sugars, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and malondialdehyde (MDA) contents. Amended plants with 10 g slag/ kg soil (D1), led to a significant improve in biomass with an increase of shoot and root dry weights (133% and 400% respectively), stomatal conductance (22 %), soluble sugars (14 %) and protein content (158%) under salinity conditions as compared to the control treatment 0 g slag/ kg soil (C), indicating a positive influence on durum wheat plants. However, soil enrichment with 20 g slag/ kg soil (D2) decreased plant growth parameters and presented the highest levels of H2O2 and MDA contents compared to the control and treatment D1 after three months of cultivation under salt-stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–1602 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 10 g slag/ kg soil under salinity, shoot dry weight increased 133% versus the control.

Treatment
10 g slag/ kg soile0
Outcome
shoote0
Direction
increasee0
Value
133%e0
Comparator
control treatment 0 g slag/ kg soil (C)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Amended plants with 10 g slag/ kg soil (D1), led to a significant improve in biomass with an increase of shoot and root dry weights (133% and 400% respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1142 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wheat exposure to salinity decreased its biomass, stomatal conductance, efficiency of photosystem II, protein content and increased total soluble sugars, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and malondialdehyde (MDA) contents. Amended plants with 10 g slag/ kg soil (D1), led to a significant improve in biomass with an increase of shoot and root dry weights (133% and 400% respectively), stomatal conductance (22 %), soluble sugars (14 %) and protein content (158%) under salinity conditions as compared to the control treatment 0 g slag/ kg soil (C), indicating a positive influence on durum wheat plants. However, soil enrichment with 20 g slag/ kg soil (D2) decreased plant growth parameters and presented the highest levels of H2O2 and MDA contents compared to the control and treatment D1 after three months of cultivation under salt-stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–1602 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 75–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 10 g slag/ kg soil under salinity, root dry weight increased 400% versus control.

Treatment
10 g slag/ kg soile0
Outcome
root dry weightse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
400%e0
Comparator
control treatment 0 g slag/ kg soil (C)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Amended plants with 10 g slag/ kg soil (D1), led to a significant improve in biomass with an increase of shoot and root dry weights (133% and 400% respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1142 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wheat exposure to salinity decreased its biomass, stomatal conductance, efficiency of photosystem II, protein content and increased total soluble sugars, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and malondialdehyde (MDA) contents. Amended plants with 10 g slag/ kg soil (D1), led to a significant improve in biomass with an increase of shoot and root dry weights (133% and 400% respectively), stomatal conductance (22 %), soluble sugars (14 %) and protein content (158%) under salinity conditions as compared to the control treatment 0 g slag/ kg soil (C), indicating a positive influence on durum wheat plants. However, soil enrichment with 20 g slag/ kg soil (D2) decreased plant growth parameters and presented the highest levels of H2O2 and MDA contents compared to the control and treatment D1 after three months of cultivation under salt-stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–1602 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 75–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 10 g slag/ kg soil under salinity, stomatal conductance rose 22%.

Treatment
10 g slag/ kg soil (D1)e1
Outcome
stomatal conductancee0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
22 %e0
Comparator
control treatment 0 g slag/ kg soil (C)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stomatal conductance (22 %), soluble sugars (14 %) and protein content (158%) under salinity conditions as compared to the control treatment 0 g slag/ kg soil (C)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1144–1306 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wheat exposure to salinity decreased its biomass, stomatal conductance, efficiency of photosystem II, protein content and increased total soluble sugars, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and malondialdehyde (MDA) contents. Amended plants with 10 g slag/ kg soil (D1), led to a significant improve in biomass with an increase of shoot and root dry weights (133% and 400% respectively), stomatal conductance (22 %), soluble sugars (14 %) and protein content (158%) under salinity conditions as compared to the control treatment 0 g slag/ kg soil (C), indicating a positive influence on durum wheat plants. However, soil enrichment with 20 g slag/ kg soil (D2) decreased plant growth parameters and presented the highest levels of H2O2 and MDA contents compared to the control and treatment D1 after three months of cultivation under salt-stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–1602 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 75–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 10 g slag/ kg soil under salinity, soluble sugars rose 14%.

Treatment
10 g slag/ kg soil (D1)e1
Outcome
soluble sugarse0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
14 %e0
Comparator
control treatment 0 g slag/ kg soil (C)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stomatal conductance (22 %), soluble sugars (14 %) and protein content (158%) under salinity conditions as compared to the control treatment 0 g slag/ kg soil (C)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1144–1306 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wheat exposure to salinity decreased its biomass, stomatal conductance, efficiency of photosystem II, protein content and increased total soluble sugars, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and malondialdehyde (MDA) contents. Amended plants with 10 g slag/ kg soil (D1), led to a significant improve in biomass with an increase of shoot and root dry weights (133% and 400% respectively), stomatal conductance (22 %), soluble sugars (14 %) and protein content (158%) under salinity conditions as compared to the control treatment 0 g slag/ kg soil (C), indicating a positive influence on durum wheat plants. However, soil enrichment with 20 g slag/ kg soil (D2) decreased plant growth parameters and presented the highest levels of H2O2 and MDA contents compared to the control and treatment D1 after three months of cultivation under salt-stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–1602 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 75–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 10 g slag/ kg soil under salinity, protein content rose 158%.

Treatment
10 g slag/ kg soil (D1)e1
Outcome
protein contente0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
158%e0
Comparator
control treatment 0 g slag/ kg soil (C)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stomatal conductance (22 %), soluble sugars (14 %) and protein content (158%) under salinity conditions as compared to the control treatment 0 g slag/ kg soil (C)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1144–1306 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wheat exposure to salinity decreased its biomass, stomatal conductance, efficiency of photosystem II, protein content and increased total soluble sugars, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and malondialdehyde (MDA) contents. Amended plants with 10 g slag/ kg soil (D1), led to a significant improve in biomass with an increase of shoot and root dry weights (133% and 400% respectively), stomatal conductance (22 %), soluble sugars (14 %) and protein content (158%) under salinity conditions as compared to the control treatment 0 g slag/ kg soil (C), indicating a positive influence on durum wheat plants. However, soil enrichment with 20 g slag/ kg soil (D2) decreased plant growth parameters and presented the highest levels of H2O2 and MDA contents compared to the control and treatment D1 after three months of cultivation under salt-stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–1602 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 75–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 20 g slag/ kg soil treatment decreased growth parameters under salt stress.

Treatment
20 g slag/ kg soil (D2)e0
Outcome
plant growth parameterse0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
control and treatment D1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil enrichment with 20 g slag/ kg soil (D2) decreased plant growth parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1372–1450 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wheat exposure to salinity decreased its biomass, stomatal conductance, efficiency of photosystem II, protein content and increased total soluble sugars, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and malondialdehyde (MDA) contents. Amended plants with 10 g slag/ kg soil (D1), led to a significant improve in biomass with an increase of shoot and root dry weights (133% and 400% respectively), stomatal conductance (22 %), soluble sugars (14 %) and protein content (158%) under salinity conditions as compared to the control treatment 0 g slag/ kg soil (C), indicating a positive influence on durum wheat plants. However, soil enrichment with 20 g slag/ kg soil (D2) decreased plant growth parameters and presented the highest levels of H2O2 and MDA contents compared to the control and treatment D1 after three months of cultivation under salt-stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–1602 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 75–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 20 g slag/ kg soil treatment produced the highest hydrogen peroxide and malondialdehyde contents under salt stress.

Treatment
20 g slag/ kg soil (D2)e1
Outcome
H2O2 and MDA contentse0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
the control and treatment D1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“presented the highest levels of H2O2 and MDA contents compared to the control and treatment D1 after three months of cultivation under salt-stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1455–1602 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wheat exposure to salinity decreased its biomass, stomatal conductance, efficiency of photosystem II, protein content and increased total soluble sugars, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and malondialdehyde (MDA) contents. Amended plants with 10 g slag/ kg soil (D1), led to a significant improve in biomass with an increase of shoot and root dry weights (133% and 400% respectively), stomatal conductance (22 %), soluble sugars (14 %) and protein content (158%) under salinity conditions as compared to the control treatment 0 g slag/ kg soil (C), indicating a positive influence on durum wheat plants. However, soil enrichment with 20 g slag/ kg soil (D2) decreased plant growth parameters and presented the highest levels of H2O2 and MDA contents compared to the control and treatment D1 after three months of cultivation under salt-stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–1602 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 75–86 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors support lower-dose slag application to improve wheat productivity and mitigate salinity stress.

Outcome
application of slag at lower dosee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of slag at lower dose improve productivity of durum wheat and mitigate salinity stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1641–1744 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wheat exposure to salinity decreased its biomass, stomatal conductance, efficiency of photosystem II, protein content and increased total soluble sugars, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and malondialdehyde (MDA) contents. Amended plants with 10 g slag/ kg soil (D1), led to a significant improve in biomass with an increase of shoot and root dry weights (133% and 400% respectively), stomatal conductance (22 %), soluble sugars (14 %) and protein content (158%) under salinity conditions as compared to the control treatment 0 g slag/ kg soil (C), indicating a positive influence on durum wheat plants. However, soil enrichment with 20 g slag/ kg soil (D2) decreased plant growth parameters and presented the highest levels of H2O2 and MDA contents compared to the control and treatment D1 after three months of cultivation under salt-stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–1602 · show in text ↑

salinity · physiology: gas exchange · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 2 positive, 22 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

salinity · physiology: oxidative · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

83 papers: 10 positive, 73 negative or no effect

72 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

79 papers more in this group

See all 83 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.