Paper · 2023 · Heliyon

Interactive effects of Pseudomonas putida and salicylic acid for mitigating drought tolerance in canola (Brassica napus L.)

Sundas Tanveer; Nosheen Akhtar; Noshin Ilyas; et al.

17
claims
48
verbatim quotes
69
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

This research was designed to analyze the interactive effects of Pseudomonas putida and salicylic acid on the growth of canola in stress and non-stress conditions. Salicylic acid is a phenolic derivative, that has a direct involvement in various plant stages like growth, and inflorescence. While Pseudomonas putida is a drought-tolerant strain having plant growth-promoting characteristics like phosphate solubilization, indole acetic acid, and catalase production. Combined application of Pseudomonas putida and salicylic acid has the ability to develop stress tolerance in plants and also improve growth of plants. They have significant (p < 0.05) effects on germination and morphological, physiological, and biochemical parameters. The plants that received the co-application of Pseudomonas putida and salicylic acid gave more significant results than their alone application. They showed enhanced germination percentage, germination index, promptness index and, seedling vigor index by 19%, 18%, 34% and, 27%, respectively. There was a substantial increase of 25%, 27%, and 39% in shoot length, root length, and leaf area, respectively. The synergistic effect of both treatments has caused a 14% and 12% increase in the Canola plants' relative water content and membrane stability index respectively. A substantial increase of 18% in proline content was observed by the inoculation of Pseudomonas putida, whereas proline content was increased by 28% by the exogenous application of salicylic acid. The content of flavonoids (39%) and phenol (40%) was significantly increased by the co-application. The increase in superoxide dismutase (46%), ascorbate peroxidase (43%), and glutathione (19%) were also significant. The present research demonstrated that the combined application of Pseudomonas putida and salicylic acid induces drought tolerance in canola and significantly improves its growth.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined Pseudomonas putida and salicylic acid application outperformed either treatment alone.

Treatment
co-application of Pseudomonas putida and salicylic acide0
Interactor
Pseudomonas putidaPseudomonas putidae0symbiont
Outcome
more significant resultse0
Direction
more significante0
Comparator
their alone applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas putida
Pseudomonas putida · InteractorMroghair · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The plants that received the co-application of Pseudomonas putida and salicylic acid gave more significant results than their alone application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–879 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined treatment increased canola germination percentage by 19%.

Treatment
Combined application of Pseudomonas putida and salicylic acide1
Interactor
Pseudomonas putidaPseudomonas putidae1symbiont
Outcome
germination percentagee0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
19%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas putida
Pseudomonas putida · InteractorMroghair · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“They showed enhanced germination percentage, germination index, promptness index and, seedling vigor index by 19%, 18%, 34% and, 27%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–1027 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–123 · show in text ↑
e1

“Combined application of Pseudomonas putida and salicylic acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 467–528 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined treatment increased canola germination index by 18%.

Treatment
Combined application of Pseudomonas putida and salicylic acide1
Interactor
Pseudomonas putidaPseudomonas putidae1symbiont
Outcome
germination indexe0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
18%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas putida
Pseudomonas putida · InteractorMroghair · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“They showed enhanced germination percentage, germination index, promptness index and, seedling vigor index by 19%, 18%, 34% and, 27%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–1027 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–123 · show in text ↑
e1

“Combined application of Pseudomonas putida and salicylic acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 467–528 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined treatment increased canola promptness index by 34%.

Treatment
Combined application of Pseudomonas putida and salicylic acide1
Interactor
Pseudomonas putidaPseudomonas putidae1symbiont
Outcome
promptness indexe0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
34%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas putida
Pseudomonas putida · InteractorMroghair · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“They showed enhanced germination percentage, germination index, promptness index and, seedling vigor index by 19%, 18%, 34% and, 27%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–1027 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–123 · show in text ↑
e1

“Combined application of Pseudomonas putida and salicylic acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 467–528 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined treatment increased canola seedling vigor index by 27%.

Treatment
Combined application of Pseudomonas putida and salicylic acide1
Interactor
Pseudomonas putidaPseudomonas putidae1symbiont
Outcome
seedling vigor indexe0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
27%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas putida
Pseudomonas putida · InteractorMroghair · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“They showed enhanced germination percentage, germination index, promptness index and, seedling vigor index by 19%, 18%, 34% and, 27%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–1027 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–123 · show in text ↑
e1

“Combined application of Pseudomonas putida and salicylic acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 467–528 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined treatment increased canola shoot length by 25%.

Treatment
Combined application of Pseudomonas putida and salicylic acide1
Interactor
Pseudomonas putidaPseudomonas putidae1symbiont
Outcome
shoot lengthe0
Direction
increasee0
Value
25%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas putida
Pseudomonas putida · InteractorMroghair · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was a substantial increase of 25%, 27%, and 39% in shoot length, root length, and leaf area, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1029–1140 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–123 · show in text ↑
e1

“Combined application of Pseudomonas putida and salicylic acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 467–528 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined treatment increased canola root length by 27%.

Treatment
Combined application of Pseudomonas putida and salicylic acide1
Interactor
Pseudomonas putidaPseudomonas putidae1symbiont
Outcome
root lengthe0
Direction
increasee0
Value
27%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas putida
Pseudomonas putida · InteractorMroghair · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was a substantial increase of 25%, 27%, and 39% in shoot length, root length, and leaf area, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1029–1140 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–123 · show in text ↑
e1

“Combined application of Pseudomonas putida and salicylic acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 467–528 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined treatment increased canola leaf area by 39%.

Treatment
Combined application of Pseudomonas putida and salicylic acide1
Interactor
Pseudomonas putidaPseudomonas putidae1symbiont
Outcome
leaf areae0
Direction
increasee0
Value
39%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas putida
Pseudomonas putida · InteractorMroghair · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was a substantial increase of 25%, 27%, and 39% in shoot length, root length, and leaf area, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1029–1140 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–123 · show in text ↑
e1

“Combined application of Pseudomonas putida and salicylic acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 467–528 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined treatment increased canola relative water content by 14%.

Treatment
Combined application of Pseudomonas putida and salicylic acide1
Interactor
Pseudomonas putidaPseudomonas putidae1symbiont
Outcome
relative water contente0
Direction
increasee0
Value
14%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas putida
Pseudomonas putida · InteractorMroghair · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The synergistic effect of both treatments has caused a 14% and 12% increase in the Canola plants' relative water content and membrane stability index respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1142–1304 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–123 · show in text ↑
e1

“Combined application of Pseudomonas putida and salicylic acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 467–528 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined treatment increased canola membrane stability index by 12%.

Treatment
Combined application of Pseudomonas putida and salicylic acide1
Interactor
Pseudomonas putidaPseudomonas putidae1symbiont
Outcome
membrane stability indexe0
Direction
increasee0
Value
12%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas putida
Pseudomonas putida · InteractorMroghair · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The synergistic effect of both treatments has caused a 14% and 12% increase in the Canola plants' relative water content and membrane stability index respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1142–1304 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–123 · show in text ↑
e1

“Combined application of Pseudomonas putida and salicylic acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 467–528 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined treatment increased canola flavonoids by 39%.

Treatment
Combined application of Pseudomonas putida and salicylic acide1
Interactor
Pseudomonas putidaPseudomonas putidae1symbiont
Outcome
flavonoidse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
39%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas putida
Pseudomonas putida · InteractorMroghair · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The content of flavonoids (39%) and phenol (40%) was significantly increased by the co-application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1503–1601 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–123 · show in text ↑
e1

“Combined application of Pseudomonas putida and salicylic acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 467–528 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined treatment increased canola phenol by 40%.

Treatment
Combined application of Pseudomonas putida and salicylic acide1
Interactor
Pseudomonas putidaPseudomonas putidae1symbiont
Outcome
phenole0
Direction
increasede0
Value
40%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas putida
Pseudomonas putida · InteractorMroghair · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The content of flavonoids (39%) and phenol (40%) was significantly increased by the co-application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1503–1601 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–123 · show in text ↑
e1

“Combined application of Pseudomonas putida and salicylic acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 467–528 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined treatment increased canola superoxide dismutase by 46%.

Treatment
Combined application of Pseudomonas putida and salicylic acide1
Interactor
Pseudomonas putidaPseudomonas putidae1symbiont
Outcome
superoxide dismutasee0
Direction
increasee0
Value
46%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas putida
Pseudomonas putida · InteractorMroghair · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increase in superoxide dismutase (46%), ascorbate peroxidase (43%), and glutathione (19%) were also significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1603–1718 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–123 · show in text ↑
e1

“Combined application of Pseudomonas putida and salicylic acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 467–528 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined treatment increased canola ascorbate peroxidase by 43%.

Treatment
Combined application of Pseudomonas putida and salicylic acide1
Interactor
Pseudomonas putidaPseudomonas putidae1symbiont
Outcome
ascorbate peroxidasee0
Direction
increasee0
Value
43%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas putida
Pseudomonas putida · InteractorMroghair · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increase in superoxide dismutase (46%), ascorbate peroxidase (43%), and glutathione (19%) were also significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1603–1718 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–123 · show in text ↑
e1

“Combined application of Pseudomonas putida and salicylic acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 467–528 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined treatment increased canola glutathione by 19%.

Treatment
Combined application of Pseudomonas putida and salicylic acide1
Interactor
Pseudomonas putidaPseudomonas putidae1symbiont
Outcome
glutathionee0
Direction
increasee0
Value
19%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas putida
Pseudomonas putida · InteractorMroghair · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increase in superoxide dismutase (46%), ascorbate peroxidase (43%), and glutathione (19%) were also significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1603–1718 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–123 · show in text ↑
e1

“Combined application of Pseudomonas putida and salicylic acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 467–528 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pseudomonas putida inoculation increased canola proline content by 18%.

Treatment
inoculation of Pseudomonas putidae0
Interactor
Pseudomonas putidaPseudomonas putidae0symbiont
Outcome
proline contente0
Direction
increasee0
Value
18%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas putida
Pseudomonas putida · InteractorMroghair · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A substantial increase of 18% in proline content was observed by the inoculation of Pseudomonas putida”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1306–1408 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salicylic acid application increased canola proline content by 28%.

Treatment
exogenous application of salicylic acide0
Outcome
proline contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
28%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“proline content was increased by 28% by the exogenous application of salicylic acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1418–1501 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–123 · show in text ↑

salicylic acid · physiology: osmolytes · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results differ

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

salicylic acid · quality: phytochemicals · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results differ

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

salicylic acid · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results differ

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

salicylic acid · molecular: metabolites · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 8 positive, 3 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

salicylic acid · growth · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 15 positive, 2 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Pseudomonas putida · quality: phytochemicals · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Pseudomonas putida · growth · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

salicylic acid · physiology: water · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.