Paper · 2023 · Frontiers in Plant Science

The importance of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria to increase air pollution tolerance index (APTI) in the plants of green belt to control dust hazards

Mahmood Najafi Zilaie; Asghar Mosleh Arani; Hassan Etesami

20
claims
20
verbatim quotes
11
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Dust causes adverse effects on the physiological and biochemical characteristics of plants and limits their use in the development of the green belt. Air Pollution Tolerance Index (APTI) is an important tool to screen out plants, based on their tolerance or sensitivity level to different air pollutants. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of two plant growth-promoting bacterial strains ( Zhihengliuella halotolerans SB and Bacillus pumilus HR) and their combination as a biological solution on APTI of three desert plant species of Seidlitzia rosmarinus , Haloxylon aphyllum and Nitraria schoberi under dust stress (0 and 1.5 g m -2 30 days -1 ). Dust caused a significant decrease of 21% and 19%, respectively, in the total chlorophyll of N. schoberi and S. rosmarinus , an 8% decrease in leaf relative water content, a 7% decrease in the APTI of N. schoberi , and a decrease of 26 and 17% in protein content of H. aphyllum and N. schoberi , respectively. However, Z. halotolerans SB increased the amount of total chlorophyll in H. aphyllum and S. rosmarinus by 236% and 21%, respectively, and the amount of ascorbic acid by 75% and 67% in H. aphyllum and N. schoberi , respectively. B. pumilus HR also increased the leaf relative water content in H. aphyllum and N. schoberi by 10% and 15%, respectively. The inoculation with B. pumilus HR, Z. halotolerans SB and the combination of these two isolates decreased the activity of peroxidase by 70%, 51%, and 36%, respectively, in N. schoberi , and 62%, 89%, and 25% in S. rosmarinus , respectively. These bacterial strains also increased the concentration of protein in all three desert plants. Under dust stress, H. aphyllum had a higher APTI than the other two species. Z. halotolerans SB, which had been isolated from S. rosmarinus , was more effective than B. pumilus HR in alleviating the effects of dust stress on this plant. Therefore, it was concluded that plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria can be effective at improving the mechanisms of plant tolerance to air pollution in the green belt.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dust decreased total chlorophyll in N. schoberi by 21%.

Taxon
N. schoberiNitraria schoberie0
Treatment
Duste0
Outcome
total chlorophylle0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
21%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nitraria schoberi
Nitraria schoberi · TaxonPeripitus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dust caused a significant decrease of 21% and 19%, respectively, in the total chlorophyll of N. schoberi and S. rosmarinus , an 8% decrease in leaf relative water content, a 7% decrease in the APTI of N. schoberi , and a decrease of 26 and 17% in protein content of H. aphyllum and N. schoberi , respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–975 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dust decreased total chlorophyll in S. rosmarinus by 19%.

Taxon
S. rosmarinusSoda rosmarinuse0
Treatment
Duste0
Outcome
total chlorophylle0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
19%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Soda rosmarinus
Soda rosmarinus · TaxonAlex Sergeev (www.asergeev.com) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dust caused a significant decrease of 21% and 19%, respectively, in the total chlorophyll of N. schoberi and S. rosmarinus , an 8% decrease in leaf relative water content, a 7% decrease in the APTI of N. schoberi , and a decrease of 26 and 17% in protein content of H. aphyllum and N. schoberi , respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–975 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dust decreased leaf relative water content in N. schoberi by 8%.

Taxon
N. schoberiNitraria schoberie0
Treatment
Duste0
Outcome
leaf relative water contente0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
8%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nitraria schoberi
Nitraria schoberi · TaxonPeripitus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dust caused a significant decrease of 21% and 19%, respectively, in the total chlorophyll of N. schoberi and S. rosmarinus , an 8% decrease in leaf relative water content, a 7% decrease in the APTI of N. schoberi , and a decrease of 26 and 17% in protein content of H. aphyllum and N. schoberi , respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–975 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dust decreased APTI in N. schoberi by 7%.

Taxon
N. schoberiNitraria schoberie0
Treatment
Duste0
Outcome
APTIe0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
7%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nitraria schoberi
Nitraria schoberi · TaxonPeripitus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dust caused a significant decrease of 21% and 19%, respectively, in the total chlorophyll of N. schoberi and S. rosmarinus , an 8% decrease in leaf relative water content, a 7% decrease in the APTI of N. schoberi , and a decrease of 26 and 17% in protein content of H. aphyllum and N. schoberi , respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–975 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dust decreased protein content in H. aphyllum by 26.

Taxon
H. aphyllumHaloxylon aphyllume0
Treatment
Duste0
Outcome
protein contente0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
26e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Haloxylon aphyllum
Haloxylon aphyllum · TaxonBáthoryPéter 22:58, 9 April 2008 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dust caused a significant decrease of 21% and 19%, respectively, in the total chlorophyll of N. schoberi and S. rosmarinus , an 8% decrease in leaf relative water content, a 7% decrease in the APTI of N. schoberi , and a decrease of 26 and 17% in protein content of H. aphyllum and N. schoberi , respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–975 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dust decreased protein content in N. schoberi by 17%.

Taxon
N. schoberiNitraria schoberie0
Treatment
Duste0
Outcome
protein contente0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
17%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nitraria schoberi
Nitraria schoberi · TaxonPeripitus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dust caused a significant decrease of 21% and 19%, respectively, in the total chlorophyll of N. schoberi and S. rosmarinus , an 8% decrease in leaf relative water content, a 7% decrease in the APTI of N. schoberi , and a decrease of 26 and 17% in protein content of H. aphyllum and N. schoberi , respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–975 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Z. halotolerans SB increased total chlorophyll in H. aphyllum by 236%.

Taxon
H. aphyllumHaloxylon aphyllume0
Treatment
Z. halotolerans SBe0
Interactor
Z. halotolerans SBZhihengliuella halotoleranse0symbiont
Outcome
total chlorophylle0
Direction
increasede0
Value
236%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Haloxylon aphyllum
Haloxylon aphyllum · TaxonBáthoryPéter 22:58, 9 April 2008 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Z. halotolerans SB increased the amount of total chlorophyll in H. aphyllum and S. rosmarinus by 236% and 21%, respectively, and the amount of ascorbic acid by 75% and 67% in H. aphyllum and N. schoberi , respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1203 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Z. halotolerans SB increased total chlorophyll in S. rosmarinus by 21%.

Taxon
S. rosmarinusSoda rosmarinuse0
Treatment
Z. halotolerans SBe0
Interactor
Z. halotolerans SBZhihengliuella halotoleranse0symbiont
Outcome
total chlorophylle0
Direction
increasede0
Value
21%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Soda rosmarinus
Soda rosmarinus · TaxonAlex Sergeev (www.asergeev.com) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Z. halotolerans SB increased the amount of total chlorophyll in H. aphyllum and S. rosmarinus by 236% and 21%, respectively, and the amount of ascorbic acid by 75% and 67% in H. aphyllum and N. schoberi , respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1203 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Z. halotolerans SB increased ascorbic acid in H. aphyllum by 75%.

Taxon
H. aphyllumHaloxylon aphyllume0
Treatment
Z. halotolerans SBe0
Interactor
Z. halotolerans SBZhihengliuella halotoleranse0symbiont
Outcome
ascorbic acide0
Direction
increasede0
Value
75%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Haloxylon aphyllum
Haloxylon aphyllum · TaxonBáthoryPéter 22:58, 9 April 2008 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Z. halotolerans SB increased the amount of total chlorophyll in H. aphyllum and S. rosmarinus by 236% and 21%, respectively, and the amount of ascorbic acid by 75% and 67% in H. aphyllum and N. schoberi , respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1203 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Z. halotolerans SB increased ascorbic acid in N. schoberi by 67%.

Taxon
N. schoberiNitraria schoberie0
Treatment
Z. halotolerans SBe0
Interactor
Z. halotolerans SBZhihengliuella halotoleranse0symbiont
Outcome
ascorbic acide0
Direction
increasede0
Value
67%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nitraria schoberi
Nitraria schoberi · TaxonPeripitus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Z. halotolerans SB increased the amount of total chlorophyll in H. aphyllum and S. rosmarinus by 236% and 21%, respectively, and the amount of ascorbic acid by 75% and 67% in H. aphyllum and N. schoberi , respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1203 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. pumilus HR increased leaf relative water content in H. aphyllum by 10%.

Taxon
H. aphyllumHaloxylon aphyllume0
Treatment
B. pumilus HRe0
Interactor
B. pumilus HRBacillus pumiluse0symbiont
Outcome
leaf relative water contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
10%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Haloxylon aphyllum
Haloxylon aphyllum · TaxonBáthoryPéter 22:58, 9 April 2008 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B. pumilus HR also increased the leaf relative water content in H. aphyllum and N. schoberi by 10% and 15%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1204–1325 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. pumilus HR increased leaf relative water content in N. schoberi by 15%.

Taxon
N. schoberiNitraria schoberie0
Treatment
B. pumilus HRe0
Interactor
B. pumilus HRBacillus pumiluse0symbiont
Outcome
leaf relative water contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
15%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nitraria schoberi
Nitraria schoberi · TaxonPeripitus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B. pumilus HR also increased the leaf relative water content in H. aphyllum and N. schoberi by 10% and 15%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1204–1325 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. pumilus HR decreased peroxidase activity in N. schoberi by 70%.

Taxon
N. schoberiNitraria schoberie0
Treatment
B. pumilus HRe0
Interactor
B. pumilus HRBacillus pumiluse0symbiont
Outcome
activity of peroxidasee0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
70%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nitraria schoberi
Nitraria schoberi · TaxonPeripitus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The inoculation with B. pumilus HR, Z. halotolerans SB and the combination of these two isolates decreased the activity of peroxidase by 70%, 51%, and 36%, respectively, in N. schoberi , and 62%, 89%, and 25% in S. rosmarinus , respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1326–1567 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Z. halotolerans SB decreased peroxidase activity in N. schoberi by 51%.

Taxon
N. schoberiNitraria schoberie0
Treatment
Z. halotolerans SBe0
Interactor
Z. halotolerans SBZhihengliuella halotoleranse0symbiont
Outcome
activity of peroxidasee0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
51%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nitraria schoberi
Nitraria schoberi · TaxonPeripitus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The inoculation with B. pumilus HR, Z. halotolerans SB and the combination of these two isolates decreased the activity of peroxidase by 70%, 51%, and 36%, respectively, in N. schoberi , and 62%, 89%, and 25% in S. rosmarinus , respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1326–1567 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

combination of these two isolates decreased peroxidase activity in N. schoberi by 36%.

Taxon
N. schoberiNitraria schoberie0
Treatment
combination of these two isolatese0
Outcome
activity of peroxidasee0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
36%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nitraria schoberi
Nitraria schoberi · TaxonPeripitus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The inoculation with B. pumilus HR, Z. halotolerans SB and the combination of these two isolates decreased the activity of peroxidase by 70%, 51%, and 36%, respectively, in N. schoberi , and 62%, 89%, and 25% in S. rosmarinus , respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1326–1567 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. pumilus HR decreased peroxidase activity in S. rosmarinus by 62%.

Taxon
S. rosmarinusSoda rosmarinuse0
Treatment
B. pumilus HRe0
Interactor
B. pumilus HRBacillus pumiluse0symbiont
Outcome
activity of peroxidasee0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
62%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Soda rosmarinus
Soda rosmarinus · TaxonAlex Sergeev (www.asergeev.com) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The inoculation with B. pumilus HR, Z. halotolerans SB and the combination of these two isolates decreased the activity of peroxidase by 70%, 51%, and 36%, respectively, in N. schoberi , and 62%, 89%, and 25% in S. rosmarinus , respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1326–1567 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Z. halotolerans SB decreased peroxidase activity in S. rosmarinus by 89%.

Taxon
S. rosmarinusSoda rosmarinuse0
Treatment
Z. halotolerans SBe0
Interactor
Z. halotolerans SBZhihengliuella halotoleranse0symbiont
Outcome
activity of peroxidasee0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
89%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Soda rosmarinus
Soda rosmarinus · TaxonAlex Sergeev (www.asergeev.com) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The inoculation with B. pumilus HR, Z. halotolerans SB and the combination of these two isolates decreased the activity of peroxidase by 70%, 51%, and 36%, respectively, in N. schoberi , and 62%, 89%, and 25% in S. rosmarinus , respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1326–1567 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

combination of these two isolates decreased peroxidase activity in S. rosmarinus by 25%.

Taxon
S. rosmarinusSoda rosmarinuse0
Treatment
combination of these two isolatese0
Outcome
activity of peroxidasee0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
25%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Soda rosmarinus
Soda rosmarinus · TaxonAlex Sergeev (www.asergeev.com) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The inoculation with B. pumilus HR, Z. halotolerans SB and the combination of these two isolates decreased the activity of peroxidase by 70%, 51%, and 36%, respectively, in N. schoberi , and 62%, 89%, and 25% in S. rosmarinus , respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1326–1567 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

H. aphyllum had a higher APTI under dust stress than the other two species.

Taxon
H. aphyllumHaloxylon aphyllume0
Outcome
APTIe0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
Under dust stresse0
Comparator
the other two speciese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Haloxylon aphyllum
Haloxylon aphyllum · TaxonBáthoryPéter 22:58, 9 April 2008 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under dust stress, H. aphyllum had a higher APTI than the other two species.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1664–1740 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Z. halotolerans SB more effectively alleviated dust stress in S. rosmarinus than B. pumilus HR.

Taxon
S. rosmarinusSoda rosmarinuse0
Treatment
Z. halotolerans SBe0
Interactor
Z. halotolerans SBZhihengliuella halotoleranse0symbiont
Outcome
alleviating the effects of dust stresse0
Direction
more effectivee0
Comparator
B. pumilus HRe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Soda rosmarinus
Soda rosmarinus · TaxonAlex Sergeev (www.asergeev.com) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Z. halotolerans SB, which had been isolated from S. rosmarinus , was more effective than B. pumilus HR in alleviating the effects of dust stress on this plant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1741–1900 · show in text ↑

Zhihengliuella halotolerans · physiology: pigments · Haloxylon aphyllumResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.