Paper · 2022 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Improved salinity and dust stress tolerance in the desert halophyte Haloxylon aphyllum by halotolerant plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria

Mahmood Najafi Zilaie; Asghar Mosleh Arani; Hassan Etesami; et al.

14
claims
28
verbatim quotes
22
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Because of global warming, desertification is increasing. One of the best strategies for combating desertification is reforestation of forests and biological operations of vegetation. However, events like soil salinity and dust storms, as the most important manifestations of desertification, prevent vegetation from settling in these areas. In this study, the effects of two halotolerant plant growth-promoting rhizobacterial strains, Bacillus pumilus HR and Zhihengliuella halotolerans SB, on physiological and nutritional status of the desert halophyte Haloxylon aphyllum under the stress of salinity (0, 300, and 600 mM NaCl) and dust (0 and 1.5 g m −2 month −1 ) were examined. Under dust application, the Z. halotolerans SB strain compared to the B. pumilus HR strain and the combination of these two bacterial strains improved the content of total chlorophyll (247 and 316%), carotenoid (94 and 107%), phosphorus (113 and 209%), magnesium (196 and 212%), and total dry biomass (13 and 28%) in H. aphyllum at salinity levels of 300 and 600 mM NaCl, respectively. Under conditions of combined application of dust and salinity, B. pumilus HR compared to Z. halotolerans SB and the combination of two strains at salinity levels of 300 and 600 mM NaCl, respectively, had better performance in increasing the content of iron (53 and 69%), calcium (38 and 161%), and seedling quality index (95 and 56%) in H. aphyllum . The results also showed that both bacterial strains and their combination were able to reduce the content of ascorbic acid, flavonoid, total phenol, proline, and malondialdehyde, and catalase activity, and ultimately improve the antioxidant capacity of H. aphyllum . This showed that the use of halotolerant rhizobacteria can stop the production of free radicals and thus prevent cell membrane damage and the formation of malondialdehyde under salinity and dust stress. The results of this study for the first time showed that halotolerant rhizobacteria can increase the seedling quality index of H. aphyllum under combined conditions of salinity and dust. The use of these bacteria can be useful in the optimal afforestation of H. aphyllum species in arid and semi-arid ecosystems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zhihengliuella halotolerans SB increased total chlorophyll by 247 and 316% at 300 and 600 mM NaCl.

Taxon
H. aphyllumHaloxylon aphyllume1
Treatment
Z. halotolerans SB straine0
Interactor
Z. halotolerans SBZhihengliuella halotoleranse0symbiont
Outcome
content of total chlorophylle0
Direction
improvede0
Value
247 and 316%e0
Comparator
B. pumilus HR straine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Haloxylon aphyllum
Haloxylon aphyllum · TaxonBáthoryPéter 22:58, 9 April 2008 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Z. halotolerans SB strain compared to the B. pumilus HR strain and the combination of these two bacterial strains improved the content of total chlorophyll (247 and 316%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–881 · show in text ↑
e1

“H. aphyllum under combined conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2017–2054 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Z. halotolerans SB improved carotenoid content by 94 and 107%.

Taxon
H. aphyllumHaloxylon aphyllume1
Treatment
Z. halotolerans SB straine0
Interactor
Z. halotolerans SBZhihengliuella halotoleranse0symbiont
Outcome
carotenoide0
Direction
improvede0
Value
94 and 107%e0
Comparator
B. pumilus HR straine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Haloxylon aphyllum
Haloxylon aphyllum · TaxonBáthoryPéter 22:58, 9 April 2008 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Z. halotolerans SB strain compared to the B. pumilus HR strain and the combination of these two bacterial strains improved the content of total chlorophyll (247 and 316%), carotenoid (94 and 107%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–907 · show in text ↑
e1

“H. aphyllum under combined conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2017–2054 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Z. halotolerans SB improved phosphorus content by 113 and 209%.

Taxon
H. aphyllumHaloxylon aphyllume1
Treatment
Z. halotolerans SB straine0
Interactor
Z. halotolerans SBZhihengliuella halotoleranse0symbiont
Outcome
phosphoruse0
Direction
improvede0
Value
113 and 209%e0
Comparator
B. pumilus HR straine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Haloxylon aphyllum
Haloxylon aphyllum · TaxonBáthoryPéter 22:58, 9 April 2008 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Z. halotolerans SB strain compared to the B. pumilus HR strain and the combination of these two bacterial strains improved the content of total chlorophyll (247 and 316%), carotenoid (94 and 107%), phosphorus (113 and 209%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–934 · show in text ↑
e1

“H. aphyllum under combined conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2017–2054 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Z. halotolerans SB improved magnesium content by 196 and 212%.

Taxon
H. aphyllumHaloxylon aphyllume1
Treatment
Z. halotolerans SB straine0
Interactor
Z. halotolerans SBZhihengliuella halotoleranse0symbiont
Outcome
magnesiume0
Direction
improvede0
Value
196 and 212%e0
Comparator
B. pumilus HR straine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Haloxylon aphyllum
Haloxylon aphyllum · TaxonBáthoryPéter 22:58, 9 April 2008 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Z. halotolerans SB strain compared to the B. pumilus HR strain and the combination of these two bacterial strains improved the content of total chlorophyll (247 and 316%), carotenoid (94 and 107%), phosphorus (113 and 209%), magnesium (196 and 212%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–960 · show in text ↑
e1

“H. aphyllum under combined conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2017–2054 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Z. halotolerans SB improved dry biomass by 13 and 28%.

Taxon
H. aphyllumHaloxylon aphyllume1
Treatment
Z. halotolerans SB straine0
Interactor
Z. halotolerans SBZhihengliuella halotoleranse0symbiont
Outcome
total dry biomasse0
Direction
improvede0
Value
13 and 28%e0
Comparator
B. pumilus HR straine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Haloxylon aphyllum
Haloxylon aphyllum · TaxonBáthoryPéter 22:58, 9 April 2008 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Z. halotolerans SB strain compared to the B. pumilus HR strain and the combination of these two bacterial strains improved the content of total chlorophyll (247 and 316%), carotenoid (94 and 107%), phosphorus (113 and 209%), magnesium (196 and 212%), and total dry biomass (13 and 28%) in H. aphyllum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–1011 · show in text ↑
e1

“H. aphyllum under combined conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2017–2054 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus pumilus HR increased iron content by 53 and 69%.

Taxon
H. aphyllumHaloxylon aphyllume1
Treatment
B. pumilus HRe0
Interactor
B. pumilus HRBacillus pumiluse0symbiont
Outcome
content of irone0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
53 and 69%e0
Comparator
Z. halotolerans SBe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Haloxylon aphyllum
Haloxylon aphyllum · TaxonBáthoryPéter 22:58, 9 April 2008 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B. pumilus HR compared to Z. halotolerans SB and the combination of two strains at salinity levels of 300 and 600 mM NaCl, respectively, had better performance in increasing the content of iron (53 and 69%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1132–1338 · show in text ↑
e1

“H. aphyllum under combined conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2017–2054 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. pumilus HR increased calcium content by 38 and 161%.

Taxon
H. aphyllumHaloxylon aphyllume1
Treatment
B. pumilus HRe0
Interactor
B. pumilus HRBacillus pumiluse0symbiont
Outcome
calciume0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
38 and 161%e0
Comparator
Z. halotolerans SBe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Haloxylon aphyllum
Haloxylon aphyllum · TaxonBáthoryPéter 22:58, 9 April 2008 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B. pumilus HR compared to Z. halotolerans SB and the combination of two strains at salinity levels of 300 and 600 mM NaCl, respectively, had better performance in increasing the content of iron (53 and 69%), calcium (38 and 161%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1132–1361 · show in text ↑
e1

“H. aphyllum under combined conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2017–2054 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. pumilus HR increased seedling quality index by 95 and 56%.

Taxon
H. aphyllumHaloxylon aphyllume1
Treatment
B. pumilus HRe0
Interactor
B. pumilus HRBacillus pumiluse0symbiont
Outcome
seedling quality indexe0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
95 and 56%e0
Comparator
Z. halotolerans SBe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Haloxylon aphyllum
Haloxylon aphyllum · TaxonBáthoryPéter 22:58, 9 April 2008 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B. pumilus HR compared to Z. halotolerans SB and the combination of two strains at salinity levels of 300 and 600 mM NaCl, respectively, had better performance in increasing the content of iron (53 and 69%), calcium (38 and 161%), and seedling quality index (95 and 56%) in H. aphyllum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1132–1417 · show in text ↑
e1

“H. aphyllum under combined conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2017–2054 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The bacterial treatments reduced ascorbic acid, flavonoid and total phenol contents.

Taxon
H. aphyllumHaloxylon aphyllume1
Treatment
both bacterial strains and their combinatione0
Outcome
content of ascorbic acid, flavonoid, total phenole0
Direction
reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Haloxylon aphyllum
Haloxylon aphyllum · TaxonBáthoryPéter 22:58, 9 April 2008 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both bacterial strains and their combination were able to reduce the content of ascorbic acid, flavonoid, total phenol, proline, and malondialdehyde, and catalase activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1449–1620 · show in text ↑
e1

“H. aphyllum under combined conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2017–2054 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The bacterial treatments reduced proline and malondialdehyde contents.

Taxon
H. aphyllumHaloxylon aphyllume1
Treatment
both bacterial strains and their combinatione0
Outcome
proline, and malondialdehydee0
Direction
reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Haloxylon aphyllum
Haloxylon aphyllum · TaxonBáthoryPéter 22:58, 9 April 2008 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both bacterial strains and their combination were able to reduce the content of ascorbic acid, flavonoid, total phenol, proline, and malondialdehyde, and catalase activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1449–1620 · show in text ↑
e1

“H. aphyllum under combined conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2017–2054 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The bacterial treatments reduced catalase activity.

Taxon
H. aphyllumHaloxylon aphyllume1
Treatment
both bacterial strains and their combinatione0
Outcome
catalase activitye0
Direction
reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Haloxylon aphyllum
Haloxylon aphyllum · TaxonBáthoryPéter 22:58, 9 April 2008 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both bacterial strains and their combination were able to reduce the content of ascorbic acid, flavonoid, total phenol, proline, and malondialdehyde, and catalase activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1449–1620 · show in text ↑
e1

“H. aphyllum under combined conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2017–2054 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The bacterial treatments improved antioxidant capacity.

Taxon
H. aphyllumHaloxylon aphyllume1
Outcome
antioxidant capacitye0
Direction
improvee0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Haloxylon aphyllum
Haloxylon aphyllum · TaxonBáthoryPéter 22:58, 9 April 2008 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“and ultimately improve the antioxidant capacity of H. aphyllum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1622–1684 · show in text ↑
e1

“H. aphyllum under combined conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2017–2054 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors infer that rhizobacteria prevent free-radical production and membrane damage.

Taxon
H. aphyllumHaloxylon aphyllume1
Outcome
cell membrane damage and the formation of malondialdehydee0
Qualifier
stop the production of free radicalse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Haloxylon aphyllum
Haloxylon aphyllum · TaxonBáthoryPéter 22:58, 9 April 2008 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the use of halotolerant rhizobacteria can stop the production of free radicals and thus prevent cell membrane damage and the formation of malondialdehyde”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1704–1857 · show in text ↑
e1

“H. aphyllum under combined conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2017–2054 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest these bacteria for Haloxylon afforestation in dry ecosystems.

Taxon
H. aphyllumHaloxylon aphyllume1
Outcome
optimal afforestatione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Haloxylon aphyllum
Haloxylon aphyllum · TaxonBáthoryPéter 22:58, 9 April 2008 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The use of these bacteria can be useful in the optimal afforestation of H. aphyllum species in arid and semi-arid ecosystems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2077–2202 · show in text ↑
e1

“H. aphyllum under combined conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2017–2054 · show in text ↑

Zhihengliuella halotolerans · physiology: pigments · Haloxylon aphyllumResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.