Paper · 2023 · Indian Journal of Ecology

Effect of Water-Soluble Fertilizers and PGPR on Soil Microbial Population, Nodule Count and Economics of Black Gram

5
claims
16
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Field experiment was conducted on effect of water-soluble fertilizers and PGPR application on soil microbial population, nodule count and economics were studied under rainfed condition during 2019 at the College of Agriculture, Shivamogga.The field experiment Kharifwas laid out in randomized complete block design and replicated thrice with thirteen treatments consisting of different combinations of 19:19:19 and monopotassium phosphate with or without PGPR application.Treatments significantly differ through foliar application of watersoluble fertilizers and PGPR application.The foliar application of 19:19:19 and monopotassium phosphate (0:52:34) @ 1% each at 30 and 45 days after sowing + PGPR along with a package of practice recorded significantly higher number of nodule count 16 and 31 at 30 and 45 DAS) ( .The higher microbial count such as N fixers (53.73, 57.31 and 47.02), P-solubilizers (35.25, 40.32 and 35.58) and K-solubilizers (25.03, 31.18 and 26.30) ×10 colony forming units (CFU) g soil at 30, 60 DAS and at harvest respectively over the package of practice 5 -1.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar application of 19:19:19 and monopotassium phosphate at 1% plus PGPR gave a significantly higher nodule count (16 and 31) at 30 and 45 DAS than the package of practice.

Taxon
Black GramVigna mungot0
Treatment
foliar application of 19:19:19 and monopotassium phosphate (0:52:34) @ 1% each at 30 and 45 days after sowing + PGPRe1
Interactor
PGPRe1symbiont
Outcome
nodule counte1
Direction
highere1
Value
16 and 31e1
Comparator
package of practicee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Economics of Black Gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–115 · show in text ↑
e1

“The foliar application of 19:19:19 and monopotassium phosphate (0:52:34) @ 1% each at 30 and 45 days after sowing + PGPR along with a package of practice recorded significantly higher number of nodule count 16 and 31 at 30 and 45 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–813 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar application of water-soluble fertilizers and PGPR gave a higher count of N fixers in soil than the package of practice.

Taxon
Black GramVigna mungot0
Treatment
foliar application of watersoluble fertilizers and PGPR applicatione0
Outcome
microbial count such as N fixerse2
Direction
highere2
Value
53.73, 57.31 and 47.02e2
Qualifier
at 30, 60 DAS and at harveste5
Comparator
package of practicee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Economics of Black Gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–115 · show in text ↑
e0

“Treatments significantly differ through foliar application of watersoluble fertilizers and PGPR application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 472–579 · show in text ↑
e2

“The higher microbial count such as N fixers (53.73, 57.31 and 47.02)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–886 · show in text ↑
e5

“×10 colony forming units (CFU) g soil at 30, 60 DAS and at harvest respectively over the package of practice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 972–1080 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar application of water-soluble fertilizers and PGPR gave a higher count of P-solubilizers in soil than the package of practice.

Taxon
Black GramVigna mungot0
Treatment
foliar application of watersoluble fertilizers and PGPR applicatione0
Outcome
P-solubilizerse3
Direction
highere3
Value
35.25, 40.32 and 35.58e3
Qualifier
at 30, 60 DAS and at harveste5
Comparator
package of practicee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Economics of Black Gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–115 · show in text ↑
e0

“Treatments significantly differ through foliar application of watersoluble fertilizers and PGPR application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 472–579 · show in text ↑
e3

“The higher microbial count such as N fixers (53.73, 57.31 and 47.02), P-solubilizers (35.25, 40.32 and 35.58)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–927 · show in text ↑
e5

“×10 colony forming units (CFU) g soil at 30, 60 DAS and at harvest respectively over the package of practice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 972–1080 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar application of water-soluble fertilizers and PGPR gave a higher count of K-solubilizers in soil than the package of practice.

Taxon
Black GramVigna mungot0
Treatment
foliar application of watersoluble fertilizers and PGPR applicatione0
Outcome
K-solubilizerse4
Direction
highere4
Value
25.03, 31.18 and 26.30e4
Qualifier
at 30, 60 DAS and at harveste5
Comparator
package of practicee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Economics of Black Gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–115 · show in text ↑
e0

“Treatments significantly differ through foliar application of watersoluble fertilizers and PGPR application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 472–579 · show in text ↑
e4

“The higher microbial count such as N fixers (53.73, 57.31 and 47.02), P-solubilizers (35.25, 40.32 and 35.58) and K-solubilizers (25.03, 31.18 and 26.30)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–971 · show in text ↑
e5

“×10 colony forming units (CFU) g soil at 30, 60 DAS and at harvest respectively over the package of practice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 972–1080 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments with water-soluble fertilizers and PGPR differ significantly.

Taxon
Black GramVigna mungot0
Treatment
foliar application of watersoluble fertilizers and PGPR applicatione0
Outcome
Treatments significantly differe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Economics of Black Gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–115 · show in text ↑
e0

“Treatments significantly differ through foliar application of watersoluble fertilizers and PGPR application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 472–579 · show in text ↑

application · soil: biology · Vigna mungo (black gram)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

inoculation · symbiosis · Vigna mungo (black gram)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 27 positive, 1 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

fertilization · soil: biology · Vigna mungo (black gram)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

inoculation · soil: biology · Vigna mungo (black gram)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

application · symbiosis · Vigna mungo (black gram)Results agree

13 papers: 13 positive, 0 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.