Abstract
Freshly made cuttings formed callus first at the base of the cutting in 4-17 days at 29.5°C. The days, as also in the figures given below, depended upon the variety studied. Lower temperatures required more time. The time required for callus formation appeared to be independent of the time of the season. The formation of roots at the base of freshly made cuttings required 10-24 days at 29.5°C. Lower temperatures required a longer period. Root formation was not affected by the time of season the cuttings were made. Bud push required 17-31 days in November, December, and January at 29.5 and 23.5°C. In February only 5-14 days were required at 29.5 and 23.5°C for the buds to push. In March, bud push occurred in 3-9 days at 29.5 and 23.5°C. Cuttings held in refrigeration before growth required a longer time for callusing, for roots to appear, and for the buds to push. Indolebutyric acid reduces the time required for cuttings to callus and roots to appear. Bud push is not affected.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 15
Claim · model-written summary
Fresh grapevine cuttings first formed callus at the base in 4-17 days at 29.5°C.
VitisOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Freshly made cuttings formed callus first at the base of the cutting in 4-17 days at 29.5°C.”
t0“Grapevine”
Claim · model-written summary
Lower temperature lengthened callusing time.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Lower temperatures required more time.”
t0“Grapevine”
Claim · model-written summary
Callus formation time appeared independent of season.
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The time required for callus formation appeared to be independent of the time of the season.”
t0“Grapevine”
Claim · model-written summary
Roots formed at cutting bases in 10-24 days at 29.5°C.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The formation of roots at the base of freshly made cuttings required 10-24 days at 29.5°C.”
t0“Grapevine”
Claim · model-written summary
Lower temperatures lengthened time to root formation.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Lower temperatures required a longer period.”
t0“Grapevine”
Claim · model-written summary
Root formation was unaffected by cutting season.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Root formation was not affected by the time of season the cuttings were made.”
t0“Grapevine”
Claim · model-written summary
Bud push took 17-31 days in November through January at the stated temperatures.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Bud push required 17-31 days in November, December, and January at 29.5 and 23.5°C.”
t0“Grapevine”
Claim · model-written summary
Bud push took 5-14 days in February.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In February only 5-14 days were required at 29.5 and 23.5°C for the buds to push.”
t0“Grapevine”
Claim · model-written summary
Bud push occurred in 3-9 days in March.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In March, bud push occurred in 3-9 days at 29.5 and 23.5°C.”
t0“Grapevine”
Claim · model-written summary
Refrigeration increased callusing time.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Cuttings held in refrigeration before growth required a longer time for callusing, for roots to appear, and for the buds to push.”
t0“Grapevine”
Claim · model-written summary
Refrigeration increased time to roots.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Cuttings held in refrigeration before growth required a longer time for callusing, for roots to appear, and for the buds to push.”
t0“Grapevine”
Claim · model-written summary
Refrigeration increased time to bud push.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Cuttings held in refrigeration before growth required a longer time for callusing, for roots to appear, and for the buds to push.”
t0“Grapevine”
Claim · model-written summary
Indolebutyric acid reduced time to callus.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Indolebutyric acid reduces the time required for cuttings to callus and roots to appear.”
t0“Grapevine”
Claim · model-written summary
Indolebutyric acid reduced time to roots.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Indolebutyric acid reduces the time required for cuttings to callus and roots to appear.”
t0“Grapevine”
Claim · model-written summary
Indolebutyric acid did not affect bud push.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Indolebutyric acid reduces the time required for cuttings to callus and roots to appear. Bud push is not affected.”
t0“Grapevine”
The same questions in other papers
indole-3-butyric acid · growth · VitisResults differ
32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
30 papers more in this group
See all 34 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.