Paper · 2018 · Asian-Australasian Journal of Bioscience and Biotechnology

Effect of submergence durations on yield and yield contributing characters of hybrid and inbred aman rice

Nasima Akhter; Kamal Uddin Ahamed; Mahmuda Akter; et al.

6
claims
14
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The trend of increasing submergence has a negative effect on the rice yield but among them, some of the genotypes show the excellent performance to give a satisfactory yield. The experiment comprised of two factors-factor a: submergence duration (4): control, 6 days, 10 days and 14 days and factor b: rice variety (6): hybrid (BRRI Hybrid dhan3, ACI Shankar and Heera-2) and inbred (BRRI dhan34, BRRI dhan46 and BRRI dhan51). The experiment was laid out in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications. Significant variation was found on different yield contributing characters and yield with submergence durations. In all the varieties, the control treatment (0 days submergence) showed the highest values (except the number of unfilled spikelets panicle-1) and was gradually decreased with increasing submergence duration from 6 days to 14 days. The lowest reduction due to submergence was recorded in BRRI dhan51, which was followed by BRRI dhan46. Attaining better yield, which was near about control, the varieties BRRI dhan51 and BRRI dhan46 proved them as relatively submergence tolerant compared to other varieties. Asian Australas. J. Biosci. Biotechnol. 2018, 3 (3), 225-230

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Submergence durations had a significant effect on yield contributing characters and yield of rice.

Treatment
submergence durationse1
Outcome
yield contributing characters and yielde1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“negative effect on the rice yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 42–75 · show in text ↑
e1

“Significant variation was found on different yield contributing characters and yield with submergence durations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 525–636 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The control treatment with 0 days submergence showed the highest values of rice yield components, except unfilled spikelets per panicle.

Treatment
control treatment (0 days submergence)e2
Outcome
valuese2
Direction
higheste2
Qualifier
except the number of unfilled spikelets panicle-1e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“negative effect on the rice yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 42–75 · show in text ↑
e2

“the control treatment (0 days submergence) showed the highest values (except the number of unfilled spikelets panicle-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 660–780 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The values of rice yield components gradually decreased as submergence duration increased from 6 to 14 days.

Treatment
increasing submergence duration from 6 days to 14 dayse3
Outcome
valuese2
Direction
gradually decreasede3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“negative effect on the rice yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 42–75 · show in text ↑
e2

“the control treatment (0 days submergence) showed the highest values (except the number of unfilled spikelets panicle-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 660–780 · show in text ↑
e3

“was gradually decreased with increasing submergence duration from 6 days to 14 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–868 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BRRI dhan51 had the lowest reduction due to submergence, followed by BRRI dhan46.

Material
BRRI dhan51e4
Treatment
submergencee4
Outcome
reduction due to submergencee4
Direction
loweste4
Qualifier
which was followed by BRRI dhan46e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“negative effect on the rice yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 42–75 · show in text ↑
e4

“The lowest reduction due to submergence was recorded in BRRI dhan51, which was followed by BRRI dhan46”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–972 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BRRI dhan51 and BRRI dhan46 proved relatively submergence tolerant compared to other varieties.

Material
BRRI dhan51 and BRRI dhan46e5
Treatment
submergencee5
Outcome
relatively submergence tolerante5
Comparator
other varietiese5

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“negative effect on the rice yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 42–75 · show in text ↑
e5

“the varieties BRRI dhan51 and BRRI dhan46 proved them as relatively submergence tolerant compared to other varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1144 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BRRI dhan51 and BRRI dhan46 gave better yield, near about the control, under submergence.

Material
BRRI dhan51 and BRRI dhan46e5
Treatment
submergencee5
Outcome
better yielde6
Direction
near about controle6
Comparator
controle6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“negative effect on the rice yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 42–75 · show in text ↑
e5

“the varieties BRRI dhan51 and BRRI dhan46 proved them as relatively submergence tolerant compared to other varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1144 · show in text ↑
e6

“Attaining better yield, which was near about control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1026 · show in text ↑

flooding · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

286 papers: 193 positive, 93 negative or no effect

192 papers in the same direction as this paper · 82 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. negative

282 papers more in this group

See all 286 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.