Paper · 2013 · Indonesian Journal of Agricultural Science

RESPONSE OF SUB1 INTROGRESSION LINES OF RICE TO VARIOUS FLOODING CONDITIONS

Yudhistira Nugraha; Georgiana V. Vergara; David J. Mackill; et al.

12
claims
28
verbatim quotes
18
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

Two types of floods can be happen in rice crops, i.e. flash floods and stagnant floods. Flash floods cause complete submergence for up to 2 weeks, while stagnant floods (SF) could partially submerge part of rice plant. To overcome yield loss due to the floods, introgression of SUB1 gene, known as a gene suppressing cell elongation and carbohydrate metabolism, to rice genotype can increase plant tolerance to complete submergence for 10 days or more. The study aimed to evaluate the response of 18 rice genotypes, including the recently developed sixth pair SUB1 near isogenic lines (NILs) of mega-rice varieties (Swarna, Sambha Mahsuri, IR64, TDK1, BR11, and CR1009), to various flooding conditions. The rice genotypes were planted at field ponds at Los Banos, Philippines, in the wet season (WS) of 2009. The treatments were 15 days submergence, SF, SF follows submergence and normal conditions. Each treatment was arranged in completely randomized block design with three replications. The results showed that the SUB1 introgression rice lines had higher survival compared to the non-SUB1 and did not much elongate their shoots during submergence. Nevertheless, under SF the rice genotypes should elongates their shoots to allow restoring contact with the air. SF and SF follows submergence decreased the panicle number, grain number per panicle and panicle fertility. Consequently, the yield declined. It suggests that sensitive genotypes are mostly sourcelimited during grain filling. The SUB1 introgression lines had higher chlorophyll concentration and less depletion in soluble sugar and starch after submergence. Under SF, soluble sugar and starch contents between the SUB1 NILs and non-SUB1 lines were not significantly different. Introgression of the SUB1 into high-yielding varieties improved submergence tolerance without affecting yield potential. The study indicates that introgression of the SUB1 into taller type rice varieties should be done to compensate the effect of suppressed elongation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SUB1 introgression rice lines had higher survival than non-SUB1 lines under submergence.

Treatment
submergencee0
Gene
SUB1e0
Outcome
survivale0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
non-SUB1e0
Setting
field ponds at Los Banos, Philippinese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“RICE TO VARIOUS FLOODING CONDITIONS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“The results showed that the SUB1 introgression rice lines had higher survival compared to the non-SUB1 and did not much elongate their shoots during submergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1151 · show in text ↑
e1

“The rice genotypes were planted at field ponds at Los Banos, Philippines, in the wet season (WS) of 2009”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–807 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SUB1 introgression rice lines did not much elongate their shoots during submergence.

Treatment
submergencee0
Gene
SUB1e0
Outcome
elongate their shootse0
Direction
did not much elongatee0
Setting
field ponds at Los Banos, Philippinese1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“RICE TO VARIOUS FLOODING CONDITIONS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“The results showed that the SUB1 introgression rice lines had higher survival compared to the non-SUB1 and did not much elongate their shoots during submergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1151 · show in text ↑
e1

“The rice genotypes were planted at field ponds at Los Banos, Philippines, in the wet season (WS) of 2009”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–807 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Under stagnant flooding, rice shoots should elongate to restore contact with the air.

Treatment
SFe2
Outcome
elongates their shootse2
Qualifier
to allow restoring contact with the aire2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“RICE TO VARIOUS FLOODING CONDITIONS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–75 · show in text ↑
e2

“Nevertheless, under SF the rice genotypes should elongates their shoots to allow restoring contact with the air”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1153–1264 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stagnant flooding and stagnant flooding followed by submergence decreased panicle number, grain number per panicle and panicle fertility.

Treatment
SF and SF follows submergencee3
Outcome
panicle number, grain number per panicle and panicle fertilitye3
Direction
decreasede3
Setting
field ponds at Los Banos, Philippinese1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“RICE TO VARIOUS FLOODING CONDITIONS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–75 · show in text ↑
e3

“SF and SF follows submergence decreased the panicle number, grain number per panicle and panicle fertility. Consequently, the yield declined”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1266–1406 · show in text ↑
e1

“The rice genotypes were planted at field ponds at Los Banos, Philippines, in the wet season (WS) of 2009”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–807 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield declined under stagnant flooding and stagnant flooding followed by submergence.

Treatment
SF and SF follows submergencee3
Outcome
yielde3
Direction
declinede3
Setting
field ponds at Los Banos, Philippinese1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“RICE TO VARIOUS FLOODING CONDITIONS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–75 · show in text ↑
e3

“SF and SF follows submergence decreased the panicle number, grain number per panicle and panicle fertility. Consequently, the yield declined”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1266–1406 · show in text ↑
e1

“The rice genotypes were planted at field ponds at Los Banos, Philippines, in the wet season (WS) of 2009”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–807 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sensitive genotypes are mostly source-limited during grain filling.

Material
sensitive genotypese4
Organ / stage
grain fillinge4
Outcome
mostly sourcelimitede4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“RICE TO VARIOUS FLOODING CONDITIONS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–75 · show in text ↑
e4

“It suggests that sensitive genotypes are mostly sourcelimited during grain filling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1408–1490 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SUB1 introgression lines had higher chlorophyll concentration after submergence.

Material
SUB1 introgression linese5
Treatment
after submergencee5
Outcome
chlorophyll concentratione5
Direction
highere5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“RICE TO VARIOUS FLOODING CONDITIONS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–75 · show in text ↑
e5

“The SUB1 introgression lines had higher chlorophyll concentration and less depletion in soluble sugar and starch after submergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1492–1622 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SUB1 introgression lines had less depletion of soluble sugar and starch after submergence.

Material
SUB1 introgression linese5
Treatment
after submergencee5
Outcome
depletion in soluble sugar and starche5
Direction
lesse5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“RICE TO VARIOUS FLOODING CONDITIONS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–75 · show in text ↑
e5

“The SUB1 introgression lines had higher chlorophyll concentration and less depletion in soluble sugar and starch after submergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1492–1622 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under stagnant flooding, soluble sugar and starch contents did not differ between SUB1 NILs and non-SUB1 lines.

Material
SUB1 NILse6
Treatment
Under SFe6
Outcome
soluble sugar and starch contentse6
Direction
no_changeinferrede6
Comparator
non-SUB1 linese6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“RICE TO VARIOUS FLOODING CONDITIONS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–75 · show in text ↑
e6

“Under SF, soluble sugar and starch contents between the SUB1 NILs and non-SUB1 lines were not significantly different”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1624–1741 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Introgression of SUB1 into high-yielding varieties improved submergence tolerance.

Treatment
Introgression of the SUB1 into high-yielding varietiese7
Outcome
submergence tolerancee7
Direction
improvede7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“RICE TO VARIOUS FLOODING CONDITIONS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–75 · show in text ↑
e7

“Introgression of the SUB1 into high-yielding varieties improved submergence tolerance without affecting yield potential”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1743–1862 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Introgression of SUB1 into high-yielding varieties did not affect yield potential.

Treatment
Introgression of the SUB1 into high-yielding varietiese7
Outcome
yield potentiale7
Direction
no_changeinferrede7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“RICE TO VARIOUS FLOODING CONDITIONS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–75 · show in text ↑
e7

“Introgression of the SUB1 into high-yielding varieties improved submergence tolerance without affecting yield potential”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1743–1862 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

SUB1 introgression should be done into taller rice varieties to compensate for suppressed elongation.

Outcome
introgression of the SUB1 into taller type rice varietiese7
Qualifier
to compensate the effect of suppressed elongatione7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“RICE TO VARIOUS FLOODING CONDITIONS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–75 · show in text ↑
e7

“The study indicates that introgression of the SUB1 into taller type rice varieties should be done to compensate the effect of suppressed elongation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1864–2011 · show in text ↑

flooding · physiology: osmolytes · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

12 papers: 8 positive, 4 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

flooding · physiology: pigments · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

23 papers: 7 positive, 16 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

transgenic · tolerance: abiotic · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

flooding · survival · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 7 positive, 5 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

transgenic · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

102 papers: 81 positive, 21 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 81 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

98 papers more in this group

See all 102 papers →

flooding · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

286 papers: 193 positive, 93 negative or no effect

92 papers in the same direction as this paper · 193 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

282 papers more in this group

See all 286 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.