Paper · 2023 · IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science

Effect of Tipping and Foliar Application of Proline and Botminn Plus on Yield and Quality of Grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) cv. Khoshnaw

Shayan Akram Mustafa; Shawkat Mustafa Al-Atrushy

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract This study was carried out on 20 years old grapevine ( Vitis vinifera L.) cv. Khoshnaw, which was growing in Chwarta town northeastern Sulaymaniyah, Kurdistan Region/Iraq, during the growing season 2021, to investigate the effect of tipping, foliar application of proline (0, 100, and 200 mg.L -1 ), botminn plus (0, 3 and 6 ml.L -1 ) and their interaction on yield and chemical characteristics of the grape. The vineyard was rain-fed cultivation and its elevation is 974 m above sea level. The results showed that tipping, foliar application of proline especially at 200 mg.L -1 , and botminn plus especially at 6 ml.L -1 gave the highest cluster weight, the number of clusters.vine -1 , total yield, TSS, total sugar, vitamin C, and Anthocyanin, While both of them did not significantly affect the percentage of phenols. The triple interaction between tipping, proline, and botminn plus significantly enhanced all detected traits since tipped vine + 200 mg.L -1 proline + 6 ml.L -1 botminn plus significantly outshine in yield and chemical characteristics of grape except total sugar and phenols compared to the untreated trees (control).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tipping gave the highest cluster weight, cluster number and total yield.

Taxon
grapevineVitise1
Material
Khoshnawe1
Treatment
tippinge0
Outcome
cluster weight, the number of clusters.vine -1 , total yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tipping, foliar application of proline especially at 200 mg.L -1 , and botminn plus especially at 6 ml.L -1 gave the highest cluster weight, the number of clusters.vine -1 , total yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–709 · show in text ↑
e1

“grapevine ( Vitis vinifera L.) cv. Khoshnaw”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 52–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Proline foliar application, especially 200 mg.L -1, gave the highest cluster weight, number and yield.

Taxon
grapevineVitise1
Treatment
foliar application of proline especially at 200 mg.L -1e0
Outcome
cluster weight, the number of clusters.vine -1 , total yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar application of proline especially at 200 mg.L -1 , and botminn plus especially at 6 ml.L -1 gave the highest cluster weight, the number of clusters.vine -1 , total yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–709 · show in text ↑
e1

“grapevine ( Vitis vinifera L.) cv. Khoshnaw”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 52–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Botminn Plus foliar application, especially 6 ml.L -1, gave the highest cluster weight, number and yield.

Taxon
grapevineVitise1
Treatment
botminn plus especially at 6 ml.L -1e0
Outcome
cluster weight, the number of clusters.vine -1 , total yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“botminn plus especially at 6 ml.L -1 gave the highest cluster weight, the number of clusters.vine -1 , total yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 595–709 · show in text ↑
e1

“grapevine ( Vitis vinifera L.) cv. Khoshnaw”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 52–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tipping gave the highest TSS, total sugar and vitamin C.

Taxon
grapevineVitise1
Treatment
tippinge0
Outcome
TSS, total sugar, vitamin Ce0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tipping, foliar application of proline especially at 200 mg.L -1 , and botminn plus especially at 6 ml.L -1 gave the highest cluster weight, the number of clusters.vine -1 , total yield, TSS, total sugar, vitamin C, and Anthocyanin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–755 · show in text ↑
e1

“grapevine ( Vitis vinifera L.) cv. Khoshnaw”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 52–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Proline foliar application gave the highest TSS, total sugar and vitamin C.

Taxon
grapevineVitise1
Treatment
foliar application of proline especially at 200 mg.L -1e0
Outcome
TSS, total sugar, vitamin Ce0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar application of proline especially at 200 mg.L -1 , and botminn plus especially at 6 ml.L -1 gave the highest cluster weight, the number of clusters.vine -1 , total yield, TSS, total sugar, vitamin C, and Anthocyanin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–755 · show in text ↑
e1

“grapevine ( Vitis vinifera L.) cv. Khoshnaw”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 52–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Botminn Plus application gave the highest TSS, total sugar and vitamin C.

Taxon
grapevineVitise1
Treatment
botminn plus especially at 6 ml.L -1e0
Outcome
TSS, total sugar, vitamin Ce0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“botminn plus especially at 6 ml.L -1 gave the highest cluster weight, the number of clusters.vine -1 , total yield, TSS, total sugar, vitamin C, and Anthocyanin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 595–755 · show in text ↑
e1

“grapevine ( Vitis vinifera L.) cv. Khoshnaw”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 52–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tipping gave the highest anthocyanin.

Taxon
grapevineVitise1
Treatment
tippinge0
Outcome
Anthocyanine0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tipping, foliar application of proline especially at 200 mg.L -1 , and botminn plus especially at 6 ml.L -1 gave the highest cluster weight, the number of clusters.vine -1 , total yield, TSS, total sugar, vitamin C, and Anthocyanin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–755 · show in text ↑
e1

“grapevine ( Vitis vinifera L.) cv. Khoshnaw”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 52–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Proline foliar application gave the highest anthocyanin.

Taxon
grapevineVitise1
Treatment
foliar application of proline especially at 200 mg.L -1e0
Outcome
Anthocyanine0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar application of proline especially at 200 mg.L -1 , and botminn plus especially at 6 ml.L -1 gave the highest cluster weight, the number of clusters.vine -1 , total yield, TSS, total sugar, vitamin C, and Anthocyanin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–755 · show in text ↑
e1

“grapevine ( Vitis vinifera L.) cv. Khoshnaw”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 52–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Botminn Plus application gave the highest anthocyanin.

Taxon
grapevineVitise1
Treatment
botminn plus especially at 6 ml.L -1e0
Outcome
Anthocyanine0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“botminn plus especially at 6 ml.L -1 gave the highest cluster weight, the number of clusters.vine -1 , total yield, TSS, total sugar, vitamin C, and Anthocyanin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 595–755 · show in text ↑
e1

“grapevine ( Vitis vinifera L.) cv. Khoshnaw”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 52–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatments did not significantly affect phenol percentage.

Taxon
grapevineVitise1
Treatment
both of theme0
Outcome
percentage of phenolse0
Direction
did not significantly affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“While both of them did not significantly affect the percentage of phenols”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–830 · show in text ↑
e1

“grapevine ( Vitis vinifera L.) cv. Khoshnaw”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 52–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The triple treatment significantly improved grape yield and chemical characteristics except total sugar and phenols versus untreated controls.

Taxon
grapevineVitise1
Treatment
tipped vine + 200 mg.L -1 proline + 6 ml.L -1 botminn pluse0
Outcome
yield and chemical characteristics of grapee0
Direction
outshinee0
Qualifier
except total sugar and phenolse0
Comparator
untreated trees (control)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tipped vine + 200 mg.L -1 proline + 6 ml.L -1 botminn plus significantly outshine in yield and chemical characteristics of grape except total sugar and phenols compared to the untreated trees (control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 947–1148 · show in text ↑
e1

“grapevine ( Vitis vinifera L.) cv. Khoshnaw”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 52–95 · show in text ↑

proline · quality: sugar starch · VitisResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

proline · yield · VitisResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

application · quality: phytochemicals · VitisPositive and negative results

24 papers: 22 positive, 2 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

application · quality: sugar starch · VitisPositive and negative results

39 papers: 34 positive, 5 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

application · yield · VitisPositive and negative results

87 papers: 80 positive, 7 negative or no effect

79 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

83 papers more in this group

See all 87 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.