Paper · 2023 · Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Research

Effectiveness of Bio-Activated Zinc Coated Urea (Engro Zabardast Urea) for Growth, Yield, and Biochemical Parameters of Rice Crop (Oryza sativa L.)

Muhammad Hasnain; Qudsia Nazir; Ifra Saleem; et al.

6
claims
10
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

I n the 820 million people of the world, malnourishment had been observed (https://www. wfp.org/) and food security is a major challenge of 21 th century Micronutrients deficiency is well documented not only in plants, Abstract | Zinc (Zn) bio-fortification is an effective, low-cost in grains of staple food like rice and wheat and possible choice to reduce/decrease the Zn deficiency among humans of poor world. Around the globe main/basic reasons of Zn deficiency are intensive agriculture and ignorance to micronutrient fertilization. Soils with less organic matter (OM), high in pH and calcareousness contribute in Zn deficiency. Moreover, efficiency of zinc (Zn) in soils is usually very little due to fixation of Zn in the soil matrix. So, a study was executed to find out the combined effects of urea coated with bio-augmented Zn 1% (Engro zabardast urea (EZU)-a fertilizer source of N and Zn) on rice growth, yield, and Zn bio-fortification. The applied treatment (EZU) was compared with control (recommended N, P and K) and ZnSO 4 + urea and P, K. Results clearly indicated that the application of EZU showed improved Zn concentration significantly in rice grains, which were maximum (66.8%) and minimum (55.3%) increase was in rice observed as compared to where no (Zn) was applied (in control) at Faisalabad and Chiniot (FSD and CHT), respectively. EZU also showed improved results of Zn contents in grains as compare to the treatment where ZnSO 4 and urea was applied separately. On the other hand, with application of EZU, agronomic parameters including straw and grains yield, and panicle length were also improved significantly (2.7, 18.7 and 16.4%, respectively), as compared to urea and ZnSO 4 application separately. Therefore, it was concluded that the application of EZU played role as a slow-release fertilizer that improved Zn bio fortification in rice grains and Zn needs of humans will be fulfilled by consumption of zinc (Zn) enrich grains of rice.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

EZU increased grain zinc at Faisalabad by 66.8% over the no-zinc control.

Treatment
EZUe0
Outcome
Zn concentration significantly in rice grainse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
66.8%e0
Comparator
no (Zn) was applied (in control)e0
Setting
Faisalabade0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of EZU showed improved Zn concentration significantly in rice grains, which were maximum (66.8%) and minimum (55.3%) increase was in rice observed as compared to where no (Zn) was applied (in control) at Faisalabad and Chiniot (FSD and CHT), respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1089–1360 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

EZU increased grain zinc at Chiniot by 55.3% over the no-zinc control.

Treatment
EZUe0
Outcome
Zn concentration significantly in rice grainse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
55.3%e0
Comparator
no (Zn) was applied (in control)e0
Setting
Chiniote0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of EZU showed improved Zn concentration significantly in rice grains, which were maximum (66.8%) and minimum (55.3%) increase was in rice observed as compared to where no (Zn) was applied (in control) at Faisalabad and Chiniot (FSD and CHT), respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1089–1360 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

EZU increased grain zinc over separately applied zinc sulfate and urea.

Treatment
EZUe0
Outcome
Zn contents in grainse0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
ZnSO 4 and urea was applied separatelye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“EZU also showed improved results of Zn contents in grains as compare to the treatment where ZnSO 4 and urea was applied separately.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1361–1492 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–129 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

EZU increased straw yield by 2.7% against separate urea and zinc sulfate.

Treatment
application of EZUe0
Outcome
strawe0
Direction
improvede0
Value
2.7e0
Comparator
urea and ZnSO 4 application separatelye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with application of EZU, agronomic parameters including straw and grains yield, and panicle length were also improved significantly (2.7, 18.7 and 16.4%, respectively), as compared to urea and ZnSO 4 application separately.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1512–1735 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–129 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

EZU increased grain yield by 18.7% against separate urea and zinc sulfate.

Treatment
application of EZUe0
Outcome
grains yielde0
Direction
improvede0
Value
18.7e0
Comparator
urea and ZnSO 4 application separatelye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with application of EZU, agronomic parameters including straw and grains yield, and panicle length were also improved significantly (2.7, 18.7 and 16.4%, respectively), as compared to urea and ZnSO 4 application separately.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1512–1735 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–129 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

EZU increased panicle length by 16.4% against separate urea and zinc sulfate.

Treatment
application of EZUe0
Outcome
panicle lengthe0
Direction
improvede0
Value
16.4%e0
Comparator
urea and ZnSO 4 application separatelye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with application of EZU, agronomic parameters including straw and grains yield, and panicle length were also improved significantly (2.7, 18.7 and 16.4%, respectively), as compared to urea and ZnSO 4 application separately.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1512–1735 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–129 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

464 papers: 409 positive, 55 negative or no effect

408 papers in the same direction as this paper · 52 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

460 papers more in this group

See all 464 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

2,045 papers: 1,803 positive, 242 negative or no effect

1,802 papers in the same direction as this paper · 193 in the opposite direction · 49 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2,041 papers more in this group

See all 2,045 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.