Abstract
I n the 820 million people of the world, malnourishment had been observed (https://www. wfp.org/) and food security is a major challenge of 21 th century Micronutrients deficiency is well documented not only in plants, Abstract | Zinc (Zn) bio-fortification is an effective, low-cost in grains of staple food like rice and wheat and possible choice to reduce/decrease the Zn deficiency among humans of poor world. Around the globe main/basic reasons of Zn deficiency are intensive agriculture and ignorance to micronutrient fertilization. Soils with less organic matter (OM), high in pH and calcareousness contribute in Zn deficiency. Moreover, efficiency of zinc (Zn) in soils is usually very little due to fixation of Zn in the soil matrix. So, a study was executed to find out the combined effects of urea coated with bio-augmented Zn 1% (Engro zabardast urea (EZU)-a fertilizer source of N and Zn) on rice growth, yield, and Zn bio-fortification. The applied treatment (EZU) was compared with control (recommended N, P and K) and ZnSO 4 + urea and P, K. Results clearly indicated that the application of EZU showed improved Zn concentration significantly in rice grains, which were maximum (66.8%) and minimum (55.3%) increase was in rice observed as compared to where no (Zn) was applied (in control) at Faisalabad and Chiniot (FSD and CHT), respectively. EZU also showed improved results of Zn contents in grains as compare to the treatment where ZnSO 4 and urea was applied separately. On the other hand, with application of EZU, agronomic parameters including straw and grains yield, and panicle length were also improved significantly (2.7, 18.7 and 16.4%, respectively), as compared to urea and ZnSO 4 application separately. Therefore, it was concluded that the application of EZU played role as a slow-release fertilizer that improved Zn bio fortification in rice grains and Zn needs of humans will be fulfilled by consumption of zinc (Zn) enrich grains of rice.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
EZU increased grain zinc at Faisalabad by 66.8% over the no-zinc control.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativae0
- Treatment
- EZUe0
- Outcome
- Zn concentration significantly in rice grainse0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 66.8%e0
- Comparator
- no (Zn) was applied (in control)e0
- Setting
- Faisalabade0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the application of EZU showed improved Zn concentration significantly in rice grains, which were maximum (66.8%) and minimum (55.3%) increase was in rice observed as compared to where no (Zn) was applied (in control) at Faisalabad and Chiniot (FSD and CHT), respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
EZU increased grain zinc at Chiniot by 55.3% over the no-zinc control.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativae0
- Treatment
- EZUe0
- Outcome
- Zn concentration significantly in rice grainse0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 55.3%e0
- Comparator
- no (Zn) was applied (in control)e0
- Setting
- Chiniote0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the application of EZU showed improved Zn concentration significantly in rice grains, which were maximum (66.8%) and minimum (55.3%) increase was in rice observed as compared to where no (Zn) was applied (in control) at Faisalabad and Chiniot (FSD and CHT), respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
EZU increased grain zinc over separately applied zinc sulfate and urea.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativat0
- Treatment
- EZUe0
- Outcome
- Zn contents in grainse0
- Direction
- improvede0
- Comparator
- ZnSO 4 and urea was applied separatelye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“EZU also showed improved results of Zn contents in grains as compare to the treatment where ZnSO 4 and urea was applied separately.”
t0“Rice Crop”
Claim · model-written summary
EZU increased straw yield by 2.7% against separate urea and zinc sulfate.
- Taxon
- Rice
Oryza sativat0
- Treatment
- application of EZUe0
- Outcome
- strawe0
- Direction
- improvede0
- Value
- 2.7e0
- Comparator
- urea and ZnSO 4 application separatelye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“with application of EZU, agronomic parameters including straw and grains yield, and panicle length were also improved significantly (2.7, 18.7 and 16.4%, respectively), as compared to urea and ZnSO 4 application separately.”
t0“Rice Crop”
Claim · model-written summary
EZU increased grain yield by 18.7% against separate urea and zinc sulfate.
- Taxon
- Rice
Oryza sativat0
- Treatment
- application of EZUe0
- Outcome
- grains yielde0
- Direction
- improvede0
- Value
- 18.7e0
- Comparator
- urea and ZnSO 4 application separatelye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“with application of EZU, agronomic parameters including straw and grains yield, and panicle length were also improved significantly (2.7, 18.7 and 16.4%, respectively), as compared to urea and ZnSO 4 application separately.”
t0“Rice Crop”
Claim · model-written summary
EZU increased panicle length by 16.4% against separate urea and zinc sulfate.
- Taxon
- Rice
Oryza sativat0
- Treatment
- application of EZUe0
- Outcome
- panicle lengthe0
- Direction
- improvede0
- Value
- 16.4%e0
- Comparator
- urea and ZnSO 4 application separatelye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“with application of EZU, agronomic parameters including straw and grains yield, and panicle length were also improved significantly (2.7, 18.7 and 16.4%, respectively), as compared to urea and ZnSO 4 application separately.”
t0“Rice Crop”
The same questions in other papers
nitrogen · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
408 papers in the same direction as this paper · 52 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- positive
460 papers more in this group
See all 464 papers →nitrogen · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
1,802 papers in the same direction as this paper · 193 in the opposite direction · 49 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
2,041 papers more in this group
See all 2,045 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.