Paper · 2016 · International Journal of Agriculture and Biology

Influence of Zinc Impregnated Urea on Growth, Yield and Grain Zinc in Rice (Oryza sativa)

Qudsia Nazir; Muhammad Arshad; Tariq Aziz; et al.

4
claims
7
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Zinc (Zn) is critically required by plants, animals and human beings. About one third of total world's poor population is at the high risk of Zn deficiency because they rely on cereals for their daily caloric intake. By keeping in mind this scenario it is hypothesized that the use of ZnO (a cheap source of Zn) impregnated urea for rice may enhance Zn contents in grains. Three types of urea were prepared including bio-activated Zn coated, Zn coated and Zn blended urea. The bio-activated Zn coated urea was prepared by inoculating the powdered organic material with Zinc solubilizing bacterium and then this material was mixed with ZnO. This bio-active Zn was coated on urea at three rates to formulate 0.5, 1 and 1.5% bio-activated Zn coated urea. Moreover, Zn blended urea was prepared by mixing powder ZnO with urea. The comparative efficacy of different types of Zn impregnated urea were compared with ZnSO4 to enhance growth, yield and grains Zn concentration of rice grown in pots. The results showed that 1.5% bio-activated Zn (ZnO) coated urea performed better in promoting growth, yield and grain Zn content than other treatments. About 15 to 20% increase was observed in yield and grain Zn concentration. This suggests that the application of 1.5% bio-activated Zn coated urea is highly effective in enhancing growth, yield and quality of rice.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 1.5% bio-activated Zn coated urea promoted rice growth better than other treatments.

Treatment
1.5% bio-activated Zn (ZnO) coated ureae0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“1.5% bio-activated Zn (ZnO) coated urea performed better in promoting growth, yield and grain Zn content than other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1141 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 1.5% bio-activated Zn coated urea promoted rice yield better than other treatments, with about a 15 to 20% increase.

Treatment
1.5% bio-activated Zn (ZnO) coated ureae0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
15 to 20%e0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“1.5% bio-activated Zn (ZnO) coated urea performed better in promoting growth, yield and grain Zn content than other treatments. About 15 to 20% increase was observed in yield and grain Zn concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1216 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 1.5% bio-activated Zn coated urea promoted grain Zn concentration better than other treatments, with about a 15 to 20% increase.

Treatment
1.5% bio-activated Zn (ZnO) coated ureae0
Outcome
grain Zn concentratione0
Direction
increasee0
Value
15 to 20%e0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“1.5% bio-activated Zn (ZnO) coated urea performed better in promoting growth, yield and grain Zn content than other treatments. About 15 to 20% increase was observed in yield and grain Zn concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1216 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–89 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 1.5% bio-activated Zn coated urea to enhance rice growth, yield and quality.

Treatment
1.5% bio-activated Zn coated ureae0
Outcome
application of 1.5% bio-activated Zn coated ureae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of 1.5% bio-activated Zn coated urea is highly effective in enhancing growth, yield and quality of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1356 · show in text ↑

zinc oxide · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

32 papers: 29 positive, 3 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

zinc oxide · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

34 papers: 32 positive, 2 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

zinc atom · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

132 papers: 118 positive, 14 negative or no effect

117 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

128 papers more in this group

See all 132 papers →

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

276 papers: 254 positive, 22 negative or no effect

253 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. negative

272 papers more in this group

See all 276 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

419 papers: 389 positive, 30 negative or no effect

388 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. no effect

415 papers more in this group

See all 419 papers →

zinc oxide · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 28 positive, 1 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

464 papers: 409 positive, 55 negative or no effect

408 papers in the same direction as this paper · 52 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

460 papers more in this group

See all 464 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

511 papers: 402 positive, 109 negative or no effect

401 papers in the same direction as this paper · 101 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.