Paper · 2022 · Australian Journal of Crop Science

Vinasse for sugarcane crop nutrition: accumulation and efficiency in the use of nutrients

Amabelia del Pino; Omar Casanova; Jorge Hernández; et al.

11
claims
11
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The use of agro-industrial by-products such as biofertilizers hinders polluting discharges and allows savings commercial fertilizers. The application of vinasse (a by-product of ethanol manufacture) in sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) production was evaluated in two soils of Uruguay (L1 and LB2). In a first ratoon crop, 150 and 300 m3 ha-1 of vinasse were applied (V150 and V300) and compared with the application of fertilizer (F) and a Control (C) with no application. Then, production and the plant’s N, P, K, Ca and Mg contents were determined. Vinasse and fertilizer applications increased sugarcane growth, as compared to C. However, there were no differences between vinasse dosses. The L1 fertilization treatment produced higher stem yield than vinasse application, whereas LB2 caused no differences. The application of vinasse at LB2 and L1 increased K uptake, exceeding the control, by 151 and 133 kg ha-1 of K, respectively, indicating that it could substitute fertilizer, while supplemental nitrogen fertilization would be required for maximum yield. The low use-efficiency of potassium (K) in vinasse treatments suggests that there was excessive consumption. Although vinasse increased soil exchangeable K, its residual effect would be insufficient for the second ratoon harvest, requiring annual applications

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vinasse increased sugarcane growth compared with the control.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
Vinassee0
Outcome
sugarcane growthe0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
Ce0

Verbatim

e0

“Vinasse and fertilizer applications increased sugarcane growth, as compared to C.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 552–633 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer increased sugarcane growth compared with the control.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
fertilizere0
Outcome
sugarcane growthe0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
Ce0

Verbatim

e0

“Vinasse and fertilizer applications increased sugarcane growth, as compared to C.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 552–633 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth did not differ between vinasse doses.

Outcome
no differences between vinasse dossese0
Direction
no differencese0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“However, there were no differences between vinasse dosses.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 634–692 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

L1 fertilizer produced more stem yield than vinasse.

Treatment
L1 fertilization treatmente0
Outcome
stem yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
vinasse applicatione0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The L1 fertilization treatment produced higher stem yield than vinasse application, whereas LB2 caused no differences.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–811 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At LB2 stem yield did not differ between fertilizer and vinasse.

Outcome
no differencese0
Direction
no differencese0
Setting
LB2e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The L1 fertilization treatment produced higher stem yield than vinasse application, whereas LB2 caused no differences.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–811 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vinasse increased K uptake at LB2 by 151 kg per hectare relative to control.

Treatment
vinassee0
Outcome
K uptakee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
151 and 133 kg ha-1 of Ke0
Comparator
the controle0
Setting
LB2e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The application of vinasse at LB2 and L1 increased K uptake, exceeding the control, by 151 and 133 kg ha-1 of K, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–937 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vinasse increased K uptake at L1 by 133 kg per hectare relative to control.

Treatment
vinassee0
Outcome
K uptakee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
151 and 133 kg ha-1 of Ke0
Comparator
the controle0
Setting
L1e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The application of vinasse at LB2 and L1 increased K uptake, exceeding the control, by 151 and 133 kg ha-1 of K, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–937 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium use efficiency was low in vinasse treatments.

Outcome
low use-efficiency of potassium (K)e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The low use-efficiency of potassium (K) in vinasse treatments suggests that there was excessive consumption.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1174 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vinasse increased soil exchangeable K.

Treatment
vinassee0
Outcome
soil exchangeable Ke0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Although vinasse increased soil exchangeable K, its residual effect would be insufficient for the second ratoon harvest, requiring annual applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1175–1325 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend supplemental nitrogen for maximum yield.

Outcome
supplemental nitrogen fertilizatione0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“supplemental nitrogen fertilization would be required for maximum yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 993–1065 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend annual vinasse applications because residual K is insufficient for the second ratoon.

Outcome
annual applicationse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“its residual effect would be insufficient for the second ratoon harvest, requiring annual applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1223–1325 · show in text ↑

fertilization · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

147 papers: 129 positive, 18 negative or no effect

128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

143 papers more in this group

See all 147 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.