Abstract
Sweet cherry, which affects consumers’ preferences with its aroma, taste and sensory properties, is a significant fruit species for human health with its bioactive compounds such as organic acids, vitamins and anthocyanins. However, its post-harvest shelf life is very short due to its sensitive fruit structure. Thus, the significant economic losses occur. In the study, effects of pre-harvest Aminoethoxyvinylglycine (AVG), Salicylic acid (SA) and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) applications on fruit quality characteristics and biochemical content in sweet cherry were determined. SA and PGPR treatments increased fruit size, but AVG decreased (If the fruit weight is 4.51 in the control application, 4.49 in the SA application and 4.10 in the PGPR, how can it be said that SA and PGPR increase the fruit weight). The fruits treated with SA, AVG and PGPR had higher fruit firmness values than the control’-fruits. Salisylic acid treatmens did not affect the rate of soluble solids content(SSC) in fruit, SSC rate was higher in PGPR treated-fruit, but AVG decreased the SSC. Titratable acidity (TA) was lower in PGPR treated-fruit, but was higher in the AVG and SA treated-fruit. Fruits treated with the SA and AVG had higher fruit color values than control fruits, while the lowest color values was obtained with PGPR treatment. In general; PGPR, SA and AVG were effective in the concentration of organic acids, but their effects varied depending on the organic acid compounds. As a result, AVG and SA delayed fruit ripening and fruit softening while PGPR, AVG and SA improved fruit quality (It is not clear how this idea was reached). These applications can be considered as a promising method for improving fruit quality at harvest and maintaining post-harvest fruit quality of sweet cherry.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 20
Claim · model-written summary
SA increased cherry fruit size.
- Taxon
- sweet cherry
Prunus aviumt0 - Treatment
- SAe0
- Outcome
- fruit sizee0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“SA and PGPR treatments increased fruit size, but AVG decreased”
t0“Sweet Cherry”
Claim · model-written summary
PGPR increased cherry fruit size.
- Taxon
- sweet cherryPrunus aviumt0
- Treatment
- PGPRe0
- Outcome
- fruit sizee0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“SA and PGPR treatments increased fruit size, but AVG decreased”
t0“Sweet Cherry”
Claim · model-written summary
AVG decreased cherry fruit size.
- Taxon
- sweet cherryPrunus aviumt0
- Treatment
- AVGe0
- Outcome
- fruit sizee0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“SA and PGPR treatments increased fruit size, but AVG decreased”
t0“Sweet Cherry”
Claim · model-written summary
SA, AVG and PGPR treated fruit had higher firmness than control fruit.
- Taxon
- sweet cherryPrunus aviumt0
- Treatment
- SA, AVG and PGPRe0
- Outcome
- fruit firmness valuese0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- control’-fruitse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The fruits treated with SA, AVG and PGPR had higher fruit firmness values than the control’-fruits.”
t0“Sweet Cherry”
Claim · model-written summary
SA did not affect cherry soluble solids content.
- Taxon
- sweet cherryPrunus aviumt0
- Treatment
- Salisylic acid treatmense0
- Outcome
- rate of soluble solids content(SSC)e0
- Direction
- did not affecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Salisylic acid treatmens did not affect the rate of soluble solids content(SSC) in fruit”
t0“Sweet Cherry”
Claim · model-written summary
PGPR raised cherry soluble solids content.
- Taxon
- sweet cherryPrunus aviumt0
- Treatment
- PGPRe0
- Outcome
- SSC ratee0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“SSC rate was higher in PGPR treated-fruit”
t0“Sweet Cherry”
Claim · model-written summary
AVG decreased cherry soluble solids content.
- Taxon
- sweet cherryPrunus aviumt0
- Treatment
- AVGe0
- Outcome
- SSCe0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“AVG decreased the SSC.”
t0“Sweet Cherry”
Claim · model-written summary
PGPR lowered titratable acidity.
- Taxon
- sweet cherryPrunus aviumt0
- Treatment
- PGPRe0
- Outcome
- Titratable acidity (TA)e0
- Direction
- lowere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Titratable acidity (TA) was lower in PGPR treated-fruit”
t0“Sweet Cherry”
Claim · model-written summary
AVG raised titratable acidity.
- Taxon
- sweet cherryPrunus aviumt0
- Treatment
- AVGe0
- Outcome
- Titratable acidity (TA)e0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Titratable acidity (TA) was lower in PGPR treated-fruit, but was higher in the AVG and SA treated-fruit.”
t0“Sweet Cherry”
Claim · model-written summary
SA raised titratable acidity.
- Taxon
- sweet cherryPrunus aviumt0
- Treatment
- SAe0
- Outcome
- Titratable acidity (TA)e0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Titratable acidity (TA) was lower in PGPR treated-fruit, but was higher in the AVG and SA treated-fruit.”
t0“Sweet Cherry”
Claim · model-written summary
SA increased fruit color values relative to control.
- Taxon
- sweet cherryPrunus aviumt0
- Treatment
- SAe0
- Outcome
- fruit color valuese0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- control fruitse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Fruits treated with the SA and AVG had higher fruit color values than control fruits”
t0“Sweet Cherry”
Claim · model-written summary
AVG increased fruit color values relative to control.
- Taxon
- sweet cherryPrunus aviumt0
- Treatment
- AVGe0
- Outcome
- fruit color valuese0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- control fruitse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Fruits treated with the SA and AVG had higher fruit color values than control fruits”
t0“Sweet Cherry”
Claim · model-written summary
PGPR produced the lowest fruit color values.
- Taxon
- sweet cherryPrunus aviumt0
- Treatment
- PGPRe0
- Outcome
- color valuese0
- Direction
- loweste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the lowest color values was obtained with PGPR treatment.”
t0“Sweet Cherry”
Claim · model-written summary
PGPR, SA and AVG had varying effects on organic acid concentrations.
- Taxon
- sweet cherryPrunus aviumt0
- Treatment
- PGPR, SA and AVGe0
- Outcome
- concentration of organic acidse0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“PGPR, SA and AVG were effective in the concentration of organic acids, but their effects varied depending on the organic acid compounds.”
t0“Sweet Cherry”
Claim · model-written summary
AVG delayed fruit ripening and softening.
- Taxon
- sweet cherryPrunus aviumt0
- Treatment
- AVGe0
- Outcome
- fruit ripening and fruit softeninge0
- Direction
- delayede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“AVG and SA delayed fruit ripening and fruit softening”
t0“Sweet Cherry”
Claim · model-written summary
SA delayed fruit ripening and softening.
- Taxon
- sweet cherryPrunus aviumt0
- Treatment
- SAe0
- Outcome
- fruit ripening and fruit softeninge0
- Direction
- delayede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“AVG and SA delayed fruit ripening and fruit softening”
t0“Sweet Cherry”
Claim · model-written summary
PGPR improved overall fruit quality according to the authors.
- Taxon
- sweet cherryPrunus aviumt0
- Treatment
- PGPRe0
- Outcome
- fruit qualitye0
- Direction
- improvede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“PGPR, AVG and SA improved fruit quality”
t0“Sweet Cherry”
Claim · model-written summary
AVG improved overall fruit quality according to the authors.
- Taxon
- sweet cherryPrunus aviumt0
- Treatment
- AVGe0
- Outcome
- fruit qualitye0
- Direction
- improvede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“PGPR, AVG and SA improved fruit quality”
t0“Sweet Cherry”
Claim · model-written summary
SA improved overall fruit quality according to the authors.
- Taxon
- sweet cherryPrunus aviumt0
- Treatment
- SAe0
- Outcome
- fruit qualitye0
- Direction
- improvede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“PGPR, AVG and SA improved fruit quality”
t0“Sweet Cherry”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors suggest these applications to improve harvest and postharvest fruit quality.
- Taxon
- sweet cherryPrunus aviume0
- Outcome
- improving fruit quality at harvest and maintaining post-harvest fruit qualitye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“These applications can be considered as a promising method for improving fruit quality at harvest and maintaining post-harvest fruit quality of sweet cherry.”
The same questions in other papers
salicylic acid · yield · Prunus avium (sweet cherry)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
inoculation · quality: grain · Prunus avium (sweet cherry)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
inoculation · yield · Prunus avium (sweet cherry)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
inoculation · molecular: metabolites · Prunus avium (sweet cherry)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.