Paper · 2021 · University of Thi-Qar Journal of agricultural research

Response of rosemary plant to the effect of Nano-NPK fertilizer and biological factors and their effect on the active substances

Hamid H. Mahewish; Falah H. Radi; Mohammed N . Radhi

10
claims
21
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The study was carried out in the canopy-covered by Alsaran of the Faculty of Agriculture and marshes University of Thi- Qar on 01.11.2020. The experiment was terminated on 15.06.2021 On the rosemary plant that old of age was one year at three seedlings per unit experimental, thus became the number of seedlings 81 Seedlings in plastic anvils, container on sandy loam soil and peat moss with a percentage 3 :1 The experiment included the treatment of the balanced compound Nano-NPK fertilizer by spray on leaves of the plant at concentrations ( 0, 25, 75) mg. l-1 by three times for a period 15th day between one adding and another, and the biological factor was added at concentrations (0, 10, 20) ml by one adding. And carried out an experiment factorial according to Randomized Complete Block Design RCBD With three replications for each treatment, the results were compared according to the least significant difference test at the probability level of 5%. The statistical analysis results showed superiority in the compound Nano-fertilizer by height and number of branches, amount of oil and its density, and some of the active substances Cymen And the Camphene And Rose Mari acid reached (53.44 cm, 78.66 branches, 2.2989 g 00. gm-1, 1.0348, 4.671, 135.70) respectively compared to the lowest value for the comparison treatment. The biological factor was superior in the following characteristics (height, branches number, oil quantity, oil density, and active compounds). Cymen and the Camphene and Rose Mari acid reached (49.77 cm, 67.44) and 2.3277 g.100. g-1), respectively, compared with the lowest value for comparative treatment. As for the interaction, the treatment outperformed N2B2 In the adjective of the number of branches insignificant, and the treatment of N2B1 In the amount of oil, oil density and some active compounds, Rose Mari acid. It had a significant effect on the treatment N0B1 Significant effect on the active compound Camphene.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano-fertilizer increased rosemary height to 53.44 cm relative to the comparison treatment.

Taxon
rosemary plantSalvia rosmarinust0
Treatment
Nano-fertilizere0
Outcome
heighte0
Direction
superioritye0
Value
53.44 cme0
Comparator
comparison treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Salvia rosmarinus
Salvia rosmarinus · TaxonMargalob · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“superiority in the compound Nano-fertilizer by height and number of branches, amount of oil and its density, and some of the active substances Cymen And the Camphene And Rose Mari acid reached (53.44 cm, 78.66 branches, 2.2989 g 00. gm-1, 1.0348, 4.671, 135.70) respectively compared to the lowest value for the comparison treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1333 · show in text ↑
t0

“rosemary plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–26 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano-fertilizer increased rosemary branch number to 78.66.

Taxon
rosemary plantSalvia rosmarinust0
Treatment
Nano-fertilizere0
Outcome
number of branchese0
Direction
superioritye0
Value
78.66 branchese0
Comparator
comparison treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Salvia rosmarinus
Salvia rosmarinus · TaxonMargalob · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“superiority in the compound Nano-fertilizer by height and number of branches, amount of oil and its density, and some of the active substances Cymen And the Camphene And Rose Mari acid reached (53.44 cm, 78.66 branches, 2.2989 g 00. gm-1, 1.0348, 4.671, 135.70) respectively compared to the lowest value for the comparison treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1333 · show in text ↑
t0

“rosemary plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–26 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano-fertilizer improved rosemary oil quantity and density versus comparison treatment.

Taxon
rosemary plantSalvia rosmarinust0
Treatment
Nano-fertilizere0
Outcome
amount of oil and its densitye0
Direction
superioritye0
Comparator
comparison treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Salvia rosmarinus
Salvia rosmarinus · TaxonMargalob · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“superiority in the compound Nano-fertilizer by height and number of branches, amount of oil and its density, and some of the active substances Cymen And the Camphene And Rose Mari acid reached (53.44 cm, 78.66 branches, 2.2989 g 00. gm-1, 1.0348, 4.671, 135.70) respectively compared to the lowest value for the comparison treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1333 · show in text ↑
t0

“rosemary plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–26 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano-fertilizer improved the named rosemary active substances versus comparison treatment.

Taxon
rosemary plantSalvia rosmarinust0
Treatment
Nano-fertilizere1
Outcome
Cymen And the Camphene And Rose Mari acide0
Direction
superioritye1
Comparator
comparison treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Salvia rosmarinus
Salvia rosmarinus · TaxonMargalob · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“some of the active substances Cymen And the Camphene And Rose Mari acid reached (53.44 cm, 78.66 branches, 2.2989 g 00. gm-1, 1.0348, 4.671, 135.70) respectively compared to the lowest value for the comparison treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1114–1333 · show in text ↑
e1

“superiority in the compound Nano-fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1044 · show in text ↑
t0

“rosemary plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–26 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The biological factor improved height and branch count relative to comparison.

Taxon
rosemary plantSalvia rosmarinust0
Treatment
biological factore0
Outcome
height, branches numbere0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
comparative treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Salvia rosmarinus
Salvia rosmarinus · TaxonMargalob · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The biological factor was superior in the following characteristics (height, branches number, oil quantity, oil density, and active compounds). Cymen and the Camphene and Rose Mari acid reached (49.77 cm, 67.44) and 2.3277 g.100. g-1), respectively, compared with the lowest value for comparative treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1335–1642 · show in text ↑
t0

“rosemary plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–26 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The biological factor improved oil quantity and oil density relative to comparison.

Taxon
rosemary plantSalvia rosmarinust0
Treatment
biological factore0
Outcome
oil quantity, oil densitye0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
comparative treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Salvia rosmarinus
Salvia rosmarinus · TaxonMargalob · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The biological factor was superior in the following characteristics (height, branches number, oil quantity, oil density, and active compounds). Cymen and the Camphene and Rose Mari acid reached (49.77 cm, 67.44) and 2.3277 g.100. g-1), respectively, compared with the lowest value for comparative treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1335–1642 · show in text ↑
t0

“rosemary plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–26 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The biological factor improved the named active compounds relative to comparison.

Taxon
rosemary plantSalvia rosmarinust0
Treatment
biological factore0
Outcome
Cymen and the Camphene and Rose Mari acide0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
comparative treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Salvia rosmarinus
Salvia rosmarinus · TaxonMargalob · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The biological factor was superior in the following characteristics (height, branches number, oil quantity, oil density, and active compounds). Cymen and the Camphene and Rose Mari acid reached (49.77 cm, 67.44) and 2.3277 g.100. g-1), respectively, compared with the lowest value for comparative treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1335–1642 · show in text ↑
t0

“rosemary plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–26 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

N2B2 had the highest branch number, without statistical significance.

Taxon
rosemary plantSalvia rosmarinust0
Treatment
N2B2e0
Outcome
number of branchese0
Direction
outperformede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Salvia rosmarinus
Salvia rosmarinus · TaxonMargalob · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the treatment outperformed N2B2 In the adjective of the number of branches insignificant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1667–1755 · show in text ↑
t0

“rosemary plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–26 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N2B1 outperformed for oil quantity, oil density, and Rose Mari acid.

Taxon
rosemary plantSalvia rosmarinust0
Treatment
N2B1e0
Outcome
amount of oil, oil density and some active compounds, Rose Mari acide0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Salvia rosmarinus
Salvia rosmarinus · TaxonMargalob · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the treatment of N2B1 In the amount of oil, oil density and some active compounds, Rose Mari acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1761–1858 · show in text ↑
t0

“rosemary plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–26 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

N0B1 significantly affected Camphene.

Taxon
rosemary plantSalvia rosmarinust0
Treatment
N0B1e0
Outcome
Camphenee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Salvia rosmarinus
Salvia rosmarinus · TaxonMargalob · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It had a significant effect on the treatment N0B1 Significant effect on the active compound Camphene.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1860–1961 · show in text ↑
t0

“rosemary plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–26 · show in text ↑

nanoparticle · yield · Salvia rosmarinus (rosemary)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

nanoparticle · molecular: metabolites · Salvia rosmarinus (rosemary)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

nanoparticle · growth · Salvia rosmarinus (rosemary)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.