Paper · 2023 · Journal of Plant Pathology

Evaluation of biopesticides for the control of Erwinia amylovora in apple and pear

S. Tianna DuPont; Kerik Cox; Ken Johnson; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
15
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract With increasing organic acreage and scrutiny of antibiotics use, alternatives to antibiotics for the control of Erwinia amylovora are of interest to stakeholders. At the same time failures of minimally tested, newly marketed products have resulted in severe infections leading to costly tree and orchard removal. We evaluated antibiotic alternatives in 8 Washington, 3 Oregon, 3 New York and 2 Pennsylvania field experiments conducted 2013 to 2022. Antibiotic alternatives included essential oils (thyme and cinnamon extracts), mineral compounds (potassium aluminum sulfate), oxidizers (peracetic acid-peroxide), soluble coppers (copper octanoate, copper hydroxide, copper sulfate pentahydrate), and biological controls ( Aureobasidium pullulans , Bacillus subtilis , bacteriophage). Studies were conducted in ‘Bartlett’ and ‘dAnjou’ pear, ‘Gala’, ‘Cameo,‘ and ‘Red Delicious’ apple with 4 to 6 single-tree replicates arranged in a randomized complete block inoculated with E. amylovora at 80–100% bloom. In summary analysis of 8 Washington trials Alum (potassium aluminum sulfate), Blossom Protect ( A. pullulans ) and several copper products (Previsto, Mastercop, Instill) provided good disease suppression of 70–73% similar to antibiotic checks. Several essential oil, copper, and peracetic acid-peroxide and biological products (Serenade Opti, Cueva, Oxidate 5.0, Jet Ag, Thyme Guard and Thymox) provided intermediate disease suppression between 45 and 62% significantly better than the water-treated control. In multistate trials Alum with 2–3 applications provided good control in most experiments (means 2019: WA 79%, NY 77%, PA 57%; 2020: OR 86%, NY 65%, WA 28%; 2021: NY 87%, WA 50%). Essential oils with 3–4 applications provided intermediate control NY 2021 81% control 23% thyme oil, 70–85% control NY 2020, 2021 60% cinnamon oil.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alum suppressed disease by 70–73% in Washington trials, similar to antibiotic checks.

Treatment
Alum (potassium aluminum sulfate)e0
Outcome
disease suppressione0
Direction
suppressione0
Value
70–73%e0
Comparator
antibiotic checkse0
Setting
Washingtone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In summary analysis of 8 Washington trials Alum (potassium aluminum sulfate), Blossom Protect ( A. pullulans ) and several copper products (Previsto, Mastercop, Instill) provided good disease suppression of 70–73% similar to antibiotic checks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1256 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple and pear”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blossom Protect suppressed disease by 70–73% in Washington trials.

Treatment
Blossom Protect ( A. pullulans )e0
Interactor
A. pullulansAureobasidium pullulanse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
disease suppressione0
Direction
suppressione0
Value
70–73%e0
Comparator
antibiotic checkse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aureobasidium pullulans
Aureobasidium pullulans · InteractorThis image was created by user Tom Volk (TomVolk) at Mushroom Observer , a source for mycological images. You can contact this user here . · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Blossom Protect ( A. pullulans ) and several copper products (Previsto, Mastercop, Instill) provided good disease suppression of 70–73% similar to antibiotic checks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1092–1256 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple and pear”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Several copper products suppressed disease by 70–73% in Washington trials.

Treatment
several copper products (Previsto, Mastercop, Instill)e0
Outcome
disease suppressione0
Direction
suppressione0
Value
70–73%e0
Comparator
antibiotic checkse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“several copper products (Previsto, Mastercop, Instill) provided good disease suppression of 70–73% similar to antibiotic checks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1129–1256 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple and pear”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Serenade Opti gave intermediate suppression of 45–62%, significantly better than water control.

Treatment
Serenade Optie0
Outcome
disease suppressione0
Direction
bettere0
Value
45 and 62%e0
Comparator
water-treated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Serenade Opti, Cueva, Oxidate 5.0, Jet Ag, Thyme Guard and Thymox) provided intermediate disease suppression between 45 and 62% significantly better than the water-treated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1342–1521 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple and pear”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cueva gave intermediate suppression of 45–62%, significantly better than water control.

Treatment
Cuevae0
Outcome
disease suppressione0
Direction
bettere0
Value
45 and 62%e0
Comparator
water-treated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Serenade Opti, Cueva, Oxidate 5.0, Jet Ag, Thyme Guard and Thymox) provided intermediate disease suppression between 45 and 62% significantly better than the water-treated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1342–1521 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple and pear”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Oxidate 5.0 gave intermediate suppression of 45–62%, significantly better than water control.

Treatment
Oxidate 5.0e0
Outcome
disease suppressione0
Direction
bettere0
Value
45 and 62%e0
Comparator
water-treated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Serenade Opti, Cueva, Oxidate 5.0, Jet Ag, Thyme Guard and Thymox) provided intermediate disease suppression between 45 and 62% significantly better than the water-treated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1342–1521 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple and pear”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Jet Ag gave intermediate suppression of 45–62%, significantly better than water control.

Treatment
Jet Age0
Outcome
disease suppressione0
Direction
bettere0
Value
45 and 62%e0
Comparator
water-treated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Serenade Opti, Cueva, Oxidate 5.0, Jet Ag, Thyme Guard and Thymox) provided intermediate disease suppression between 45 and 62% significantly better than the water-treated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1342–1521 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple and pear”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Thyme Guard gave intermediate suppression of 45–62%, significantly better than water control.

Treatment
Thyme Guarde0
Outcome
disease suppressione0
Direction
bettere0
Value
45 and 62%e0
Comparator
water-treated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Serenade Opti, Cueva, Oxidate 5.0, Jet Ag, Thyme Guard and Thymox) provided intermediate disease suppression between 45 and 62% significantly better than the water-treated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1342–1521 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple and pear”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Thymox gave intermediate suppression of 45–62%, significantly better than water control.

Treatment
Thymoxe0
Outcome
disease suppressione0
Direction
bettere0
Value
45 and 62%e0
Comparator
water-treated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Serenade Opti, Cueva, Oxidate 5.0, Jet Ag, Thyme Guard and Thymox) provided intermediate disease suppression between 45 and 62% significantly better than the water-treated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1342–1521 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple and pear”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two to three Alum applications controlled disease in most multistate experiments.

Treatment
Alum with 2–3 applicationse0
Outcome
good controle0
Direction
good controle0
Qualifier
most experimentse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Alum with 2–3 applications provided good control in most experiments (means 2019: WA 79%, NY 77%, PA 57%; 2020: OR 86%, NY 65%, WA 28%; 2021: NY 87%, WA 50%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1544–1701 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple and pear”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three to four essential-oil applications provided intermediate control.

Treatment
Essential oils with 3–4 applicationse0
Outcome
intermediate controle0
Direction
intermediate controle0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Essential oils with 3–4 applications provided intermediate control NY 2021 81% control 23% thyme oil, 70–85% control NY 2020, 2021 60% cinnamon oil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1703–1850 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple and pear”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–82 · show in text ↑

botanical · control · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.