Paper · 2023 · Agronomy

Long-Term Organic Manure Substitution Increases Yield and Phosphorus Use Efficiency in a Double-Rice System by Altering Soil Phosphorus Uptake and Apparent Balance

Nafiu Garba Hayatu; Yiren Liu; Shuxiang Zhang; et al.

15
claims
27
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The excessive use of chemical phosphorus (P) fertilizer can lower grain yield and P use efficiency (PUE) by aggravating soil acidity. Substituting organic manure for chemical fertilizer can alleviate the problem, although the long-term effect of organic manure incorporation is unknown. We conceptualized that substituting organic manure for chemical fertilizer may result in higher crop yields and PUE. Therefore, the impact of long-term fertilizer treatments: (i) CK (control), (ii) PK (phosphorus and potassium fertilizer), (iii) NP (nitrogen and P fertilizer), (iv) NK fertilizer, (v) NPK fertilizer, and (vi) NPKM (30% NPK fertilizer plus 70% manure) on rice yield, PUE, P uptake, and apparent balance (APB) was investigated. The results showed that rice yield under different fertilizer treatments ranged from 6.2 to 11.8 t ha−1 (1984–1995), 7.9 to 12.7 t ha−1 (1996–2007), and 6.6 to 12.8 t ha−1 (2008–2018). The rice yield under NPKM was greatly improved compared to other treatments, except with that of NPK (1984–1995). Soil organic carbon (SOC), available P and phosphorus activation coefficient (PAC) under NPKM were significantly higher than other treatments during 1984–2018. Soil pH (1984–2018) was greatly higher under CK and NPKM than under other treatments. Soil total P under PK, NP, NPK, and NPKM was significantly higher than under CK and NK (1984–2018). Compared to other treatments, P uptake was significantly higher under NPKM, except with that of NPK (1984–1995 and 2008–2018). The average PUE (1984–2018) was 10.7, 20.2, 36.1, and 44.2 kg kg−1 under PK, NP, NPK, and NPKM, respectively. The APB under NPKM was significantly lower as compared to PK, NP, and NPK treatments. Therefore, we conclude that in addition to improving soil organic carbon, cations inputs from organic manure can be a factor for the increase in soil pH, making organic manure substitution for chemical fertilizer a more efficient strategy for increasing PUE and crop yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice yield under different fertilizer treatments ranged from 6.2 to 11.8 t ha−1 in 1984–1995.

Outcome
rice yielde1
Value
6.2 to 11.8 t ha−1e1
Qualifier
1984–1995e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“rice yield under different fertilizer treatments ranged from 6.2 to 11.8 t ha−1 (1984–1995), 7.9 to 12.7 t ha−1 (1996–2007), and 6.6 to 12.8 t ha−1 (2008–2018)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–914 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice yield under different fertilizer treatments ranged from 7.9 to 12.7 t ha−1 in 1996–2007.

Outcome
rice yielde1
Value
7.9 to 12.7 t ha−1e1
Qualifier
1996–2007e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“rice yield under different fertilizer treatments ranged from 6.2 to 11.8 t ha−1 (1984–1995), 7.9 to 12.7 t ha−1 (1996–2007), and 6.6 to 12.8 t ha−1 (2008–2018)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–914 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice yield under different fertilizer treatments ranged from 6.6 to 12.8 t ha−1 in 2008–2018.

Outcome
rice yielde1
Value
6.6 to 12.8 t ha−1e1
Qualifier
2008–2018e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“rice yield under different fertilizer treatments ranged from 6.2 to 11.8 t ha−1 (1984–1995), 7.9 to 12.7 t ha−1 (1996–2007), and 6.6 to 12.8 t ha−1 (2008–2018)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–914 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice yield under NPKM (30% NPK plus 70% manure) was greatly improved compared with other treatments, except NPK in 1984–1995.

Treatment
NPKM (30% NPK fertilizer plus 70% manure)e3
Outcome
rice yielde2
Direction
greatly improvede2
Qualifier
except with that of NPK (1984–1995)e2
Comparator
other treatmentse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“The rice yield under NPKM was greatly improved compared to other treatments, except with that of NPK (1984–1995)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–1028 · show in text ↑
e3

“NPKM (30% NPK fertilizer plus 70% manure)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 614–655 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under NPKM, soil organic carbon, available P and phosphorus activation coefficient were significantly higher than under other treatments during 1984–2018.

Treatment
NPKMe4
Outcome
Soil organic carbon (SOC), available P and phosphorus activation coefficient (PAC)e4
Direction
significantly highere4
Qualifier
1984–2018e4
Comparator
other treatmentse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Soil organic carbon (SOC), available P and phosphorus activation coefficient (PAC) under NPKM were significantly higher than other treatments during 1984–2018”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1188 · show in text ↑
e2

“The rice yield under NPKM was greatly improved compared to other treatments, except with that of NPK (1984–1995)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–1028 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under PK, NP, NPK and NPKM, soil total P was significantly higher than under CK and NK during 1984–2018.

Treatment
PK, NP, NPK, and NPKMe5
Outcome
Soil total Pe5
Direction
significantly highere5
Qualifier
1984–2018e5
Comparator
CK and NKe5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Soil total P under PK, NP, NPK, and NPKM was significantly higher than under CK and NK (1984–2018)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1276–1374 · show in text ↑
e2

“The rice yield under NPKM was greatly improved compared to other treatments, except with that of NPK (1984–1995)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–1028 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil pH under CK and NPKM was greatly higher than under other treatments during 1984–2018.

Treatment
CK and NPKMe6
Outcome
Soil pHe6
Direction
greatly highere6
Qualifier
1984–2018e6
Comparator
other treatmentse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Soil pH (1984–2018) was greatly higher under CK and NPKM than under other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1274 · show in text ↑
e2

“The rice yield under NPKM was greatly improved compared to other treatments, except with that of NPK (1984–1995)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–1028 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

P uptake under NPKM was significantly higher than under other treatments, except NPK in 1984–1995 and 2008–2018.

Treatment
NPKMe7
Outcome
P uptakee7
Direction
significantly highere7
Qualifier
except with that of NPK (1984–1995 and 2008–2018)e7
Comparator
other treatmentse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“Compared to other treatments, P uptake was significantly higher under NPKM, except with that of NPK (1984–1995 and 2008–2018)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1376–1501 · show in text ↑
e2

“The rice yield under NPKM was greatly improved compared to other treatments, except with that of NPK (1984–1995)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–1028 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average PUE (1984–2018) under PK was 10.7 kg kg−1.

Treatment
PKe3
Outcome
average PUEe3
Value
10.7e3
Qualifier
kg kg−1e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The average PUE (1984–2018) was 10.7, 20.2, 36.1, and 44.2 kg kg−1 under PK, NP, NPK, and NPKM, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1503–1611 · show in text ↑
e2

“The rice yield under NPKM was greatly improved compared to other treatments, except with that of NPK (1984–1995)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–1028 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average PUE (1984–2018) under NP was 20.2 kg kg−1.

Treatment
NPe3
Outcome
average PUEe3
Value
20.2e3
Qualifier
kg kg−1e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The average PUE (1984–2018) was 10.7, 20.2, 36.1, and 44.2 kg kg−1 under PK, NP, NPK, and NPKM, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1503–1611 · show in text ↑
e2

“The rice yield under NPKM was greatly improved compared to other treatments, except with that of NPK (1984–1995)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–1028 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average PUE (1984–2018) under NPK was 36.1 kg kg−1.

Treatment
NPKe3
Outcome
average PUEe3
Value
36.1e3
Qualifier
kg kg−1e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The average PUE (1984–2018) was 10.7, 20.2, 36.1, and 44.2 kg kg−1 under PK, NP, NPK, and NPKM, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1503–1611 · show in text ↑
e2

“The rice yield under NPKM was greatly improved compared to other treatments, except with that of NPK (1984–1995)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–1028 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average PUE (1984–2018) under NPKM was 44.2 kg kg−1.

Treatment
NPKMe3
Outcome
average PUEe3
Value
44.2e3
Qualifier
kg kg−1e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The average PUE (1984–2018) was 10.7, 20.2, 36.1, and 44.2 kg kg−1 under PK, NP, NPK, and NPKM, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1503–1611 · show in text ↑
e2

“The rice yield under NPKM was greatly improved compared to other treatments, except with that of NPK (1984–1995)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–1028 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The apparent P balance (APB) under NPKM was significantly lower than under PK, NP and NPK.

Treatment
NPKMe3
Outcome
APBe3
Direction
significantly lowere3
Comparator
PK, NP, and NPK treatmentse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The APB under NPKM was significantly lower as compared to PK, NP, and NPK treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1613–1697 · show in text ↑
e2

“The rice yield under NPKM was greatly improved compared to other treatments, except with that of NPK (1984–1995)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–1028 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Cation inputs from organic manure may be a factor in the increase in soil pH.

Treatment
cations inputs from organic manuree4
Outcome
increase in soil pHe4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“cations inputs from organic manure can be a factor for the increase in soil pH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1773–1851 · show in text ↑
e2

“The rice yield under NPKM was greatly improved compared to other treatments, except with that of NPK (1984–1995)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–1028 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Organic manure substitution for chemical fertilizer is a more efficient strategy for increasing PUE and rice yield.

Outcome
increasing PUE and crop yielde5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“making organic manure substitution for chemical fertilizer a more efficient strategy for increasing PUE and crop yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1853–1971 · show in text ↑
e2

“The rice yield under NPKM was greatly improved compared to other treatments, except with that of NPK (1984–1995)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–1028 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3,455 papers: 3,183 positive, 272 negative or no effect

3,182 papers in the same direction as this paper · 207 in the opposite direction · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,451 papers more in this group

See all 3,455 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.