Paper · 2023 · Egyptian Journal of Botany

The Impact of Copper Chlorophyllin on the Growth, Yield, and Physiological Characteristics of Spinach Plants under Drought Stress

Mansour E. Ramadan

9
claims
25
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

One of the major factors significantly modifying plant physiology and ultimately causing a loss in crop productivity is water deficiency stress. Plant-based pigments are highly effective in enhancing growth and reducing the consequences of water stress. The present study aimed to identify the effects of copper chlorophyllin (Cu-Chl) at rates of 0, 1, and 2% on the growth, yield, and physiological traits of spinach plants of the variety Viroflay grown under three irrigation levels of 100%, 75%, and 50% crop evapotranspiration rates (ETc) in the 2020 and 2021 growing seasons. In comparison with full irrigation (100% ETc), deficit irrigation with 50% ETc drastically reduced plant growth parameters (height, leaf number, leaf area, and fresh and dry weight), yield, relative water content (RWC), leaf membrane stability index (MSI), electrolyte leakage (EL), chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, carotenoids, Fe, and Cu content. However, the nitrate and oxalate content increased in the plants. All studied values were significantly higher except nitrate and oxalate content which were lower with Cu-Chl application, in comparison with those without Cu-Chl application. The present work demonstrated that the adverse effects of water deficit on growth, yield, plant water status, and photosynthetic pigments of spinach plants could be alleviated when using Cu-Chl application.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deficit irrigation at 50% ETc reduced spinach height, leaf number and leaf area compared with full irrigation.

Treatment
deficit irrigation with 50% ETce1
Outcome
height, leaf number, leaf areae2
Direction
reducede1
Comparator
full irrigation (100% ETc)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In comparison with full irrigation (100% ETc), deficit irrigation with 50% ETc drastically reduced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–679 · show in text ↑
e2

“plant growth parameters (height, leaf number, leaf area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–735 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spinach Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deficit irrigation at 50% ETc reduced spinach fresh and dry weight compared with full irrigation.

Treatment
deficit irrigation with 50% ETce1
Outcome
fresh and dry weighte2
Direction
reducede1
Comparator
full irrigation (100% ETc)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In comparison with full irrigation (100% ETc), deficit irrigation with 50% ETc drastically reduced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–679 · show in text ↑
e2

“fresh and dry weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–761 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spinach Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deficit irrigation at 50% ETc reduced spinach yield compared with full irrigation.

Treatment
deficit irrigation with 50% ETce1
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
reducede1
Comparator
full irrigation (100% ETc)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In comparison with full irrigation (100% ETc), deficit irrigation with 50% ETc drastically reduced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–679 · show in text ↑
e2

“fresh and dry weight), yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–769 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spinach Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deficit irrigation at 50% ETc reduced relative water content, membrane stability index and electrolyte leakage compared with full irrigation.

Treatment
deficit irrigation with 50% ETce1
Outcome
relative water content (RWC), leaf membrane stability index (MSI), electrolyte leakage (EL)e2
Direction
reducede1
Comparator
full irrigation (100% ETc)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In comparison with full irrigation (100% ETc), deficit irrigation with 50% ETc drastically reduced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–679 · show in text ↑
e2

“relative water content (RWC), leaf membrane stability index (MSI), electrolyte leakage (EL)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 771–862 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spinach Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deficit irrigation at 50% ETc reduced chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b and carotenoids compared with full irrigation.

Treatment
deficit irrigation with 50% ETce1
Outcome
chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, carotenoidse2
Direction
reducede1
Comparator
full irrigation (100% ETc)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In comparison with full irrigation (100% ETc), deficit irrigation with 50% ETc drastically reduced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–679 · show in text ↑
e2

“chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, carotenoids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 864–905 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spinach Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deficit irrigation at 50% ETc reduced Fe and Cu content compared with full irrigation.

Treatment
deficit irrigation with 50% ETce1
Outcome
Fe, and Cu contente2
Direction
reducede1
Comparator
full irrigation (100% ETc)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In comparison with full irrigation (100% ETc), deficit irrigation with 50% ETc drastically reduced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–679 · show in text ↑
e2

“Fe, and Cu content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–925 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spinach Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrate and oxalate content increased in spinach under 50% ETc deficit irrigation compared with full irrigation.

Treatment
deficit irrigation with 50% ETce1
Outcome
nitrate and oxalate contente2
Direction
increasede2
Comparator
full irrigation (100% ETc)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In comparison with full irrigation (100% ETc), deficit irrigation with 50% ETc drastically reduced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–679 · show in text ↑
e2

“the nitrate and oxalate content increased in the plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–991 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spinach Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Copper chlorophyllin application gave significantly higher values of all studied traits than no application, except nitrate and oxalate.

Material
Viroflaye2
Treatment
Cu-Chl applicatione1
Outcome
All studied valuese1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
those without Cu-Chl applicatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“All studied values were significantly higher except nitrate and oxalate content which were lower with Cu-Chl application, in comparison with those without Cu-Chl application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 993–1166 · show in text ↑
e2

“spinach plants of the variety Viroflay”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–448 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Copper chlorophyllin application lowered nitrate and oxalate content in spinach compared with no application.

Material
Viroflaye2
Treatment
Cu-Chl applicatione1
Outcome
nitrate and oxalate contente1
Direction
lowere1
Comparator
those without Cu-Chl applicatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“All studied values were significantly higher except nitrate and oxalate content which were lower with Cu-Chl application, in comparison with those without Cu-Chl application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 993–1166 · show in text ↑
e2

“spinach plants of the variety Viroflay”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–448 · show in text ↑

copper atom · nutrient: content · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

irrigation · nutrient: content · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

irrigation · yield · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 7 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

irrigation · growth · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 6 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

irrigation · physiology: pigments · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Results agree

5 papers: 0 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.