Abstract

In the 1:1 (cotton:grain) system of short-rotation, soybean, bean, mung bean crops were harvested as a repeat crop after winter wheat. Their stem crop and mixed siderate crops (perco, oats, green peas) were planted in the second half of August, and the blue mass crop grown in October-November was harvested for livestock. The lower 15-20 cm part of the stem was plowed under the plow as a blue manure, at the end of one rotation, the amount of organic carbon in the soil increased by 0.041-0.073%, and the total nitrogen content by 0.012-0.016% compared to the initial values. The highest rate of dry mass accumulation of cotton was observed when using short-row rotation 1:1, winter wheat + mixed siderate crops (perco, oat, green pea):cotton system. The dry mass of the leaves of the Navroz variety of cotton was 22.6 g, the dry mass of the stem was 33.4 g, the dry mass of the bolls was 18.5 g, and the dry mass of the cotton was 48.0 g. The total dry mass of 1 plant was equal to 122.5 g. In the 1:1 (cotton:grain) system of short-rotation, when cotton was grown as a repeat crop after legume-cereal (soybean, mung bean) and mixed siderate (perco, oat, green pea) crops, it provided a higher and better quality cotton yield. Cotton yield was 3.2-5.8 tons/ha, fiber output was 1.0-1.5 percent, and 1000 seed mass was 9.0-11.0 g/ha. Besides, the length of the fiber was found to be higher by 1.4-2.0 mm.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic soil carbon increased after the rotation.

Treatment
short rotation cropping systemst0
Outcome
organic carbon in the soile0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0.041-0.073%e0
Comparator
initial valuese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the amount of organic carbon in the soil increased by 0.041-0.073%, and the total nitrogen content by 0.012-0.016% compared to the initial values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–576 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of using repeated and siderate crops on soil fertility, yield of cotton varieties, and technological quality indicators of cotton fiber in short rotation cropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–177 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total soil nitrogen increased after the rotation.

Treatment
short rotation cropping systemst0
Outcome
total nitrogen contente0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
0.012-0.016%e0
Comparator
initial valuese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the total nitrogen content by 0.012-0.016% compared to the initial values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 503–576 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of using repeated and siderate crops on soil fertility, yield of cotton varieties, and technological quality indicators of cotton fiber in short rotation cropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–177 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The wheat plus mixed siderate rotation gave the highest cotton dry mass accumulation.

Treatment
short-row rotation 1:1, winter wheat + mixed siderate crops (perco, oat, green pea):cotton systeme0
Outcome
rate of dry mass accumulation of cottone0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest rate of dry mass accumulation of cotton was observed when using short-row rotation 1:1, winter wheat + mixed siderate crops (perco, oat, green pea):cotton system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–751 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Navroz cotton leaf dry mass was 22.6 g.

Material
Navroze0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Outcome
dry mass of the leavese0
Value
22.6 ge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The dry mass of the leaves of the Navroz variety of cotton was 22.6 g”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–822 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Navroz cotton stem dry mass was 33.4 g.

Organ / stage
steme0
Outcome
dry mass of the steme0
Value
33.4 ge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the dry mass of the stem was 33.4 g”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–859 · show in text ↑
t0

“yield of cotton varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–88 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Navroz cotton boll dry mass was 18.5 g.

Organ / stage
bollse0
Outcome
dry mass of the bollse0
Value
18.5 ge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the dry mass of the bolls was 18.5 g”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–897 · show in text ↑
t0

“yield of cotton varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–88 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Navroz cotton dry mass was 48.0 g.

Outcome
dry mass of the cottone0
Value
48.0 ge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the dry mass of the cotton was 48.0 g”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 903–940 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total dry mass per plant was 122.5 g.

Outcome
total dry mass of 1 plante0
Value
122.5 ge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The total dry mass of 1 plant was equal to 122.5 g”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–992 · show in text ↑
t0

“yield of cotton varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The legume and siderate rotation gave higher quality cotton yield.

Treatment
legume-cereal (soybean, mung bean) and mixed siderate (perco, oat, green pea) cropse0
Outcome
cotton yielde0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“when cotton was grown as a repeat crop after legume-cereal (soybean, mung bean) and mixed siderate (perco, oat, green pea) crops, it provided a higher and better quality cotton yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1046–1228 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton yield was 3.2-5.8 tons/ha.

Outcome
Cotton yielde0
Value
3.2-5.8 tons/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton yield was 3.2-5.8 tons/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1230–1262 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fiber output was 1.0-1.5 percent.

Outcome
fiber outpute0
Value
1.0-1.5 percente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fiber output was 1.0-1.5 percent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1264–1296 · show in text ↑
t0

“yield of cotton varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–88 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 1000 seed mass was 9.0-11.0 g/ha.

Outcome
1000 seed masse0
Value
9.0-11.0 g/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“1000 seed mass was 9.0-11.0 g/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1302–1334 · show in text ↑
t0

“yield of cotton varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–88 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fiber length was higher by 1.4-2.0 mm.

Outcome
length of the fibere0
Direction
highere0
Value
1.4-2.0 mme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the length of the fiber was found to be higher by 1.4-2.0 mm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1345–1405 · show in text ↑
t0

“yield of cotton varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–88 · show in text ↑

Vigna radiata · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Glycine max · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 18 positive, 9 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

rotation · nutrient: content · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

cultivation system · soil: chemistry · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

rotation · soil: chemistry · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

cultivation system · nutrient: content · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.