Paper · 1990 · jpa

Productivity of Cotton Following Rice

C. E. Snipes; M. E. Kurtz; J. E. Street

6
claims
7
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The continuous cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.) culture practices of the Mississippi Delta tend to deplete soil organic matter and maximize soil losses. Conversely, rice ( Oryza sativa L.) production in the Mississippi Delta produces considerable amounts of dry matter which offers the possibility of increases in soil organic matter and reduction of soil erosion during the winter. Experiments were conducted over 4‐yr, 1984 to 1987, at the Delta Branch Experiment Station, Stoneville, MS, on a mixed Bosket (fine‐loamy, mixed, thermic Mollic Hapludalf) and Beulah (coarse‐loamy, mixed, thermic Typic Dystrochrepts) very fine sandy loam to evaluate the effects of rice and cotton rotation schemes on cotton yield, growth, and soil parameters in subsequent years. In 1986, penetrometer data revealed increased soil compaction in plots previously grown to rice for 2 yr prior to cotton when compared with continuous cotton. These differences in soil compaction were not found in 1987. When compared with continuous cotton, cotton heights in 1986 were reduced following 2 yr of rice. In 1987, seed cotton yields following two cycles of a 1:1 rotation with rice were slightly lower than continuous cotton. In 1987 soil test Ca was lower in rice plots following a 1:1 rice‐cotton rotation than continuous cotton. Results indicated that continuous cotton was of equal productivity with rice and cotton rotations.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1986, soil compaction was increased in plots previously grown to rice for 2 yr before cotton compared with continuous cotton.

Treatment
previously grown to rice for 2 yre0
Outcome
soil compactione0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
continuous cottone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 1986, penetrometer data revealed increased soil compaction in plots previously grown to rice for 2 yr prior to cotton when compared with continuous cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 763–920 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The differences in soil compaction between rice-preceded and continuous cotton plots were not found in 1987.

Treatment
Ricet0
Outcome
soil compactione1
Direction
not founde1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton Following Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–37 · show in text ↑
e1

“These differences in soil compaction were not found in 1987”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 922–981 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton heights in 1986 were reduced following 2 yr of rice compared with continuous cotton.

Treatment
2 yr of ricee0
Outcome
cotton heightse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
continuous cottone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When compared with continuous cotton, cotton heights in 1986 were reduced following 2 yr of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1079 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1987, seed cotton yields following two cycles of a 1:1 rotation with rice were slightly lower than continuous cotton.

Treatment
two cycles of a 1:1 rotation with ricee0
Outcome
seed cotton yieldse0
Direction
slightly lowere0
Comparator
continuous cottone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 1987, seed cotton yields following two cycles of a 1:1 rotation with rice were slightly lower than continuous cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1081–1200 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1987, soil test Ca was lower in rice plots following a 1:1 rice-cotton rotation than in continuous cotton.

Treatment
1:1 rice‐cotton rotatione0
Outcome
soil test Cae0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
continuous cottone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 1987 soil test Ca was lower in rice plots following a 1:1 rice‐cotton rotation than continuous cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1202–1306 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded that continuous cotton was of equal productivity to rice and cotton rotations.

Treatment
rice and cotton rotationse0
Outcome
productivitye0
Direction
equale0
Comparator
continuous cottone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results indicated that continuous cotton was of equal productivity with rice and cotton rotations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1308–1405 · show in text ↑

Oryza sativa · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

rotation · nutrient: content · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

rotation · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

43 papers: 26 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

39 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.