Paper · 2023 · Plants

Different Responses to Water Deficit of Two Common Winter Wheat Varieties: Physiological and Biochemical Characteristics

Antoaneta V. Popova; Gergana Mihailova; Maria Geneva; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
11
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Since water scarcity is one of the main risks for the future of agriculture, studying the ability of different wheat genotypes to tolerate a water deficit is fundamental. This study examined the responses of two hybrid wheat varieties (Gizda and Fermer) with different drought resistance to moderate (3 days) and severe (7 days) drought stress, as well as their post-stress recovery to understand their underlying defense strategies and adaptive mechanisms in more detail. To this end, the dehydration-induced alterations in the electrolyte leakage, photosynthetic pigment content, membrane fluidity, energy interaction between pigment-protein complexes, primary photosynthetic reactions, photosynthetic and stress-induced proteins, and antioxidant responses were analyzed in order to unravel the different physiological and biochemical strategies of both wheat varieties. The results demonstrated that Gizda plants are more tolerant to severe dehydration compared to Fermer, as evidenced by the lower decrease in leaf water and pigment content, lower inhibition of photosystem II (PSII) photochemistry and dissipation of thermal energy, as well as lower dehydrins' content. Some of defense mechanisms by which Gizda variety can tolerate drought stress involve the maintenance of decreased chlorophyll content in leaves, increased fluidity of the thylakoid membranes causing structural alterations in the photosynthetic apparatus, as well as dehydration-induced accumulation of early light-induced proteins (ELIPs), an increased capacity for PSI cyclic electron transport and enhanced antioxidant enzyme activity (SOD and APX), thus alleviating oxidative damage. Furthermore, the leaf content of total phenols, flavonoids, and lipid-soluble antioxidant metabolites was higher in Gizda than in Fermer.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gizda tolerated severe dehydration better than Fermer.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Gizdae0
Treatment
severe dehydratione0
Outcome
tolerante0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
Fermere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gizda plants are more tolerant to severe dehydration compared to Fermer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 903–974 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gizda had a smaller decrease in leaf water content under severe dehydration than Fermer.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Gizdae0
Treatment
severe dehydratione0
Outcome
leaf watere0
Direction
lower decreasee0
Comparator
Fermere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gizda plants are more tolerant to severe dehydration compared to Fermer, as evidenced by the lower decrease in leaf water and pigment content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 903–1044 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gizda had a smaller decrease in pigment content under severe dehydration than Fermer.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
pigment contente0
Direction
lower decreasee0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lower decrease in leaf water and pigment content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1044 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gizda had less PSII photochemistry inhibition and thermal energy dissipation than Fermer.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
inhibition of photosystem II (PSII) photochemistry and dissipation of thermal energye0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lower inhibition of photosystem II (PSII) photochemistry and dissipation of thermal energy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1046–1136 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gizda had lower dehydrin content than Fermer.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
dehydrins' contente0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lower dehydrins' content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1149–1173 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–63 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gizda maintained reduced leaf chlorophyll under drought.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maintenance of decreased chlorophyll content in leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1265–1319 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–63 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gizda had increased thylakoid membrane fluidity linked to photosynthetic structural changes.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
fluidity of the thylakoid membranese0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased fluidity of the thylakoid membranes causing structural alterations in the photosynthetic apparatus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1321–1429 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–63 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gizda accumulated early light-induced proteins after dehydration.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
dehydration-inducede0
Outcome
early light-induced proteins (ELIPs)e0
Direction
accumulatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dehydration-induced accumulation of early light-induced proteins (ELIPs)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1442–1514 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–63 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gizda increased PSI cyclic electron transport capacity and antioxidant enzyme activity.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
capacity for PSI cyclic electron transport and enhanced antioxidant enzyme activity (SOD and APX)e0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an increased capacity for PSI cyclic electron transport and enhanced antioxidant enzyme activity (SOD and APX)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1516–1626 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–63 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gizda had higher leaf total phenols, flavonoids, and lipid-soluble antioxidants than Fermer.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Gizdae0
Outcome
leaf content of total phenols, flavonoids, and lipid-soluble antioxidant metabolitese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
Fermere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the leaf content of total phenols, flavonoids, and lipid-soluble antioxidant metabolites was higher in Gizda than in Fermer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1676–1800 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–63 · show in text ↑

drought · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

35 papers: 22 positive, 13 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

drought · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

206 papers: 60 positive, 146 negative or no effect

59 papers in the same direction as this paper · 146 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

202 papers more in this group

See all 206 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.