Paper · 2023 · Bragantia

Physiological and agronomic response of soybean cultivars to soil compaction in the Brazilian Cerrado

Camila Jorge Bernabé Ferreira; Alessandro Guerra da Silva; Cassio Antonio Tormena; et al.

10
claims
15
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Soil compaction negatively impacts soil physical functions, affecting root growth and crop yield. This study aimed to evaluate different soybean cultivars’ agronomic and physiological performance as a function of compaction in Rhodic Ferralsol under no-tillage (NT) with a clay loam texture in the Brazilian Cerrado biome. The experiment was implemented in Rio Verde, Goias state, central Brazil. The experimental design was a randomized block with a 3x2 factorial scheme with six replications. The first factor corresponded to three soybean cultivars from different maturity groups (MG) identified as super-early (MG = 6.2); early (MG = 6.8), and medium (MG = 7.9). The second factor was the cultivation in compacted and uncompacted soil. The experiment evaluated the soil physical properties: bulk density, total porosity, water content at matric potential -6 kPa, aeration capacity and water and air holding capacity in 0.0-0.1 and 0.1-0.2 m layers, agronomic and physiological traits (gas exchange). Soil compaction negatively affected the agronomic traits of soybean cultivars, with better performance of the medium cycle cultivar. Net photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, and transpiration rates were reduced up to 50% under compaction and were not influenced by cultivars. Our findings suggest that soil compaction negatively affected the performance of soybean cultivars with lower maturity groups reflecting in lower plant height, shoot and root dry mass, number of pods and grain yield. The choice of soybean cultivars with a longer cycle can be an alternative to minimize the adverse effects of soil compaction.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compaction impaired agronomic traits of soybean cultivars.

Taxon
soybean cultivarsGlycine maxe0
Treatment
Soil compactione0
Outcome
agronomic traitse0
Direction
negatively affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil compaction negatively affected the agronomic traits of soybean cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1004–1081 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The medium-cycle soybean cultivar performed better under compaction.

Taxon
soybean cultivarsGlycine maxt0
Material
medium cycle cultivare0
Outcome
better performancee0
Direction
bettere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with better performance of the medium cycle cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1083–1135 · show in text ↑
t0

“Physiological and agronomic response of soybean cultivars to soil compaction in the Brazilian Cerrado”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Net photosynthesis fell by up to 50% under compaction.

Taxon
soybean cultivarsGlycine maxt0
Treatment
compactione0
Outcome
Net photosynthesise0
Direction
reducede0
Value
up to 50%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Net photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, and transpiration rates were reduced up to 50% under compaction and were not influenced by cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1137–1279 · show in text ↑
t0

“Physiological and agronomic response of soybean cultivars to soil compaction in the Brazilian Cerrado”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stomatal conductance fell by up to 50% under compaction.

Taxon
soybean cultivarsGlycine maxt0
Treatment
compactione0
Outcome
stomatal conductancee0
Direction
reducede0
Value
up to 50%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Net photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, and transpiration rates were reduced up to 50% under compaction and were not influenced by cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1137–1279 · show in text ↑
t0

“Physiological and agronomic response of soybean cultivars to soil compaction in the Brazilian Cerrado”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transpiration rates fell by up to 50% under compaction.

Taxon
soybean cultivarsGlycine maxt0
Treatment
compactione0
Outcome
transpiration ratese0
Direction
reducede0
Value
up to 50%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Net photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, and transpiration rates were reduced up to 50% under compaction and were not influenced by cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1137–1279 · show in text ↑
t0

“Physiological and agronomic response of soybean cultivars to soil compaction in the Brazilian Cerrado”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The three gas-exchange traits were not influenced by cultivar.

Taxon
soybean cultivarsGlycine maxt0
Outcome
Net photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, and transpiration ratese0
Direction
not influencede0
Comparator
cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Net photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, and transpiration rates were reduced up to 50% under compaction and were not influenced by cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1137–1279 · show in text ↑
t0

“Physiological and agronomic response of soybean cultivars to soil compaction in the Brazilian Cerrado”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower-maturity soybean cultivars had lower plant height, shoot and root dry mass, pod number, and grain yield under compaction.

Taxon
soybean cultivarsGlycine maxe0
Material
lower maturity groupse0
Treatment
soil compactione0
Outcome
plant height, shoot and root dry masse0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil compaction negatively affected the performance of soybean cultivars with lower maturity groups reflecting in lower plant height, shoot and root dry mass, number of pods and grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1307–1496 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower-maturity soybean cultivars had fewer pods under compaction.

Taxon
soybean cultivarsGlycine maxe0
Material
lower maturity groupse0
Treatment
soil compactione0
Outcome
number of podse0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil compaction negatively affected the performance of soybean cultivars with lower maturity groups reflecting in lower plant height, shoot and root dry mass, number of pods and grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1307–1496 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower-maturity soybean cultivars had lower grain yield under compaction.

Taxon
soybean cultivarsGlycine maxe0
Material
lower maturity groupse0
Treatment
soil compactione0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil compaction negatively affected the performance of soybean cultivars with lower maturity groups reflecting in lower plant height, shoot and root dry mass, number of pods and grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1307–1496 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest choosing longer-cycle soybean cultivars to reduce compaction damage.

Taxon
soybean cultivarsGlycine maxe0
Outcome
choice of soybean cultivars with a longer cyclee0
Qualifier
minimize the adverse effects of soil compactione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The choice of soybean cultivars with a longer cycle can be an alternative to minimize the adverse effects of soil compaction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1498–1622 · show in text ↑

tillage · growth · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ

84 papers: 52 positive, 32 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 52 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

80 papers more in this group

See all 84 papers →

tillage · physiology: gas exchange · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

tillage · physiology: photosynthesis · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 7 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

tillage · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

390 papers: 264 positive, 126 negative or no effect

125 papers in the same direction as this paper · 264 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

386 papers more in this group

See all 390 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.