Paper · 2023 · Plants

Developing Functional Relationships between Soil Moisture Content and Corn Early-Season Physiology, Growth, and Development

Ranadheer Reddy Vennam; Purushothaman Ramamoorthy; Sadikshya Poudel; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
39
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Drought is a severe threat to agriculture production that affects all growth stages of plants, including corn (Zea mays L.). Any factor affecting early seedling growth and development will significantly impact yield. Despite the recurrence of low rainfall during the growing seasons, corn responses to different early-season soil moisture content levels have not been investigated. In this study, we investigated how corn morpho-physiological and biomass traits responded to varied soil moisture content during the early vegetative stage. Two corn hybrids were grown in a pot-culture facility under five different soil moisture treatments (0.15, 0.12, 0.09, 0.06, and 0.03 m3 m−3 volumetric water content, VWC) to assess the growth and developmental responses to varied soil moisture content during early-season growth (V2 to V7) stage. Sub-optimal soil moisture content limited plant growth and development by reducing physiological and phenotypic expression. Stomatal conductance and transpiration were decreased by an average of 65% and 59% across stress treatments relative to optimum conditions. On average, soil moisture deficit reduced the total leaf area by 71% and 72% compared to the control in ‘A6659VT2RIB’ and ‘P1316YHR’, respectively. Shoot and root dry weights were reduced by 74% and 43% under 0.03 m3 m−3 VWC. An increase in the root-to-shoot ratio was noticed under low VWC conditions compared to the control. Based on the stress tolerance index, the physiology and leaf growth parameters were more sensitive to soil moisture deficit. Our results highlight the impact of sub-optimal soil moisture on physiology and morphological traits during early-season growth. ‘P1316YHR’ demonstrated better physiological performance under stress conditions, while ‘A6659VT2RIB’ produced relatively better root growth. The findings suggest that biomass partitioning between shoot and root components is dynamic and depends on stress intensity. The current findings can help to prioritize traits associated with the early-season drought tolerance in corn. The functional relationships developed between soil moisture content and growth and developmental responses can be integrated into corn crop modeling to allow better irrigation management decisions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stress treatments reduced stomatal conductance by an average of 65%.

Treatment
stress treatmentse0
Outcome
Stomatal conductancee0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
65%e0
Comparator
optimum conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Stomatal conductance and transpiration were decreased by an average of 65% and 59% across stress treatments relative to optimum conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1099 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 70–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stress treatments reduced transpiration by an average of 59%.

Treatment
stress treatmentse0
Outcome
transpiratione0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
59%e0
Comparator
optimum conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Stomatal conductance and transpiration were decreased by an average of 65% and 59% across stress treatments relative to optimum conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1099 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 70–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moisture deficit reduced total leaf area in A6659VT2RIB by 71%.

Material
A6659VT2RIBe0
Treatment
soil moisture deficite0
Outcome
total leaf areae0
Direction
reducede0
Value
71%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil moisture deficit reduced the total leaf area by 71% and 72% compared to the control in ‘A6659VT2RIB’ and ‘P1316YHR’, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1113–1247 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 70–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moisture deficit reduced total leaf area in P1316YHR by 72%.

Material
P1316YHRe0
Treatment
soil moisture deficite0
Outcome
total leaf areae0
Direction
reducede0
Value
72%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil moisture deficit reduced the total leaf area by 71% and 72% compared to the control in ‘A6659VT2RIB’ and ‘P1316YHR’, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1113–1247 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 70–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 0.03 m3 m−3 VWC, shoot dry weight fell by 74%.

Treatment
0.03 m3 m−3 VWCe0
Outcome
Shoote0
Direction
reducede0
Value
74%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shoot and root dry weights were reduced by 74% and 43% under 0.03 m3 m−3 VWC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1249–1325 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 70–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 0.03 m3 m−3 VWC, root dry weight fell by 43%.

Treatment
0.03 m3 m−3 VWCe0
Outcome
root dry weightse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
43%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shoot and root dry weights were reduced by 74% and 43% under 0.03 m3 m−3 VWC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1249–1325 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 70–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low VWC increased the root-to-shoot ratio relative to control.

Treatment
low VWC conditionse0
Outcome
root-to-shoot ratioe0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An increase in the root-to-shoot ratio was noticed under low VWC conditions compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1327–1426 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 70–74 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Physiology and leaf growth parameters were more sensitive to moisture deficit by stress tolerance index.

Outcome
physiology and leaf growth parameterse0
Direction
more sensitivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Based on the stress tolerance index, the physiology and leaf growth parameters were more sensitive to soil moisture deficit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1428–1551 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 70–74 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P1316YHR had better physiological performance under stress.

Material
P1316YHRe0
Outcome
physiological performancee0
Direction
bettere0
Qualifier
stress conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“‘P1316YHR’ demonstrated better physiological performance under stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1682–1762 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 70–74 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A6659VT2RIB had relatively better root growth.

Material
A6659VT2RIBe0
Outcome
root growthe0
Direction
bettere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“‘A6659VT2RIB’ produced relatively better root growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1770–1822 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 70–74 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biomass partitioning between shoot and root depended on stress intensity.

Treatment
stress intensitye0
Outcome
biomass partitioning between shoot and root componentse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“biomass partitioning between shoot and root components is dynamic and depends on stress intensity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1850–1947 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 70–74 · show in text ↑

drought · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

385 papers: 77 positive, 308 negative or no effect

307 papers in the same direction as this paper · 77 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

381 papers more in this group

See all 385 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.