Paper · 2021 · International Journal of Research in Agronomy

Effect of minimum tillage on productivity and economics of sweet corn-pulses intercropping system

AD Deshmane; MR Ghanbahadur; KR Chavhan

7
claims
11
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Field experiment was carried out at Department of Agronomy, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, and Akola (M.S.) during kharif 2013 to study the effect of minimum tillage on productivity and economics of sweet corn - pulses intercropping system in FRBD with four replication. The main plot treatment viz., S1- Conventional tillage (one Ploughing and two harrowing), S2- Minimum tillage (one harrowing) and three sub-plot treatment of intercropping I1- Sole sweet corn, I2- Sweet corn+ Green gram (1:2ratio), I3- Sweet corn + Black gram (1:2ratio).The result revealed that conventional tillage treatment recorded higher number of cob ha-1, biological yield, harvest index, GMR (186507 ₹ ha-1), NMR (148159 ₹ ha-1), and B: C ratio (4.96) than minimum tillage and among intercropping treatments sweet corn + black gram recorded highest GMR (194698 ₹ ha-1), NMR (157467 ₹ ha-1), B: C ratio (5.23) followed by treatment sweet corn + green gram.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage produced a higher cob number, biological yield and harvest index than minimum tillage.

Taxon
sweet cornt0
Treatment
conventional tillagee0
Outcome
number of cob ha-1, biological yield, harvest indexe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
minimum tillagee0

Verbatim

e0

“conventional tillage treatment recorded higher number of cob ha-1, biological yield, harvest index, GMR (186507 ₹ ha-1), NMR (148159 ₹ ha-1), and B: C ratio (4.96) than minimum tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–762 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage yielded higher GMR than minimum tillage.

Taxon
sweet cornt0
Treatment
conventional tillagee0
Outcome
GMRe0
Direction
highere0
Value
186507 ₹ ha-1e0
Comparator
minimum tillagee0

Verbatim

e0

“conventional tillage treatment recorded higher number of cob ha-1, biological yield, harvest index, GMR (186507 ₹ ha-1), NMR (148159 ₹ ha-1), and B: C ratio (4.96) than minimum tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–762 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage yielded higher NMR than minimum tillage.

Taxon
sweet cornt0
Treatment
conventional tillagee0
Outcome
NMRe0
Direction
highere0
Value
148159 ₹ ha-1e0
Comparator
minimum tillagee0

Verbatim

e0

“conventional tillage treatment recorded higher number of cob ha-1, biological yield, harvest index, GMR (186507 ₹ ha-1), NMR (148159 ₹ ha-1), and B: C ratio (4.96) than minimum tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–762 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage yielded higher B: C ratio than minimum tillage.

Taxon
sweet cornt0
Treatment
conventional tillagee0
Outcome
B: C ratioe0
Direction
highere0
Value
4.96e0
Comparator
minimum tillagee0

Verbatim

e0

“conventional tillage treatment recorded higher number of cob ha-1, biological yield, harvest index, GMR (186507 ₹ ha-1), NMR (148159 ₹ ha-1), and B: C ratio (4.96) than minimum tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–762 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sweet corn and black gram intercropping had the highest GMR, followed by sweet corn and green gram.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Treatment
sweet corn + black grame0
Outcome
GMRe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
194698 ₹ ha-1e0
Comparator
sweet corn + green grame0

Verbatim

e0

“sweet corn + black gram recorded highest GMR (194698 ₹ ha-1), NMR (157467 ₹ ha-1), B: C ratio (5.23) followed by treatment sweet corn + green gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–944 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sweet corn and black gram intercropping had the highest NMR, followed by sweet corn and green gram.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Treatment
sweet corn + black grame0
Outcome
NMRe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
157467 ₹ ha-1e0
Comparator
sweet corn + green grame0

Verbatim

e0

“sweet corn + black gram recorded highest GMR (194698 ₹ ha-1), NMR (157467 ₹ ha-1), B: C ratio (5.23) followed by treatment sweet corn + green gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–944 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sweet corn and black gram intercropping had the highest B: C ratio, followed by sweet corn and green gram.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Treatment
sweet corn + black grame0
Outcome
B: C ratioe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
5.23e0
Comparator
sweet corn + green grame0

Verbatim

e0

“sweet corn + black gram recorded highest GMR (194698 ₹ ha-1), NMR (157467 ₹ ha-1), B: C ratio (5.23) followed by treatment sweet corn + green gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–944 · show in text ↑

Zea mays subsp. mays · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

292 papers: 196 positive, 96 negative or no effect

195 papers in the same direction as this paper · 85 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

288 papers more in this group

See all 292 papers →

Vigna mungo · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 29 positive, 3 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.