Abstract
A field experiment was conducted at Agricultural Research Station, Perumallapalle, Tirupati, Acharya N. G. Ranga Agricultural University, Andhra Pradesh, India during 2021-22 to study the effect of microbial inoculants and fertilizers on nutrient uptake and yield of sugarcane short crop. The experiment was laid out in randomized block design with ten treatments and replicated thrice. The treatments consist of 75%, 100% and 125% RDF in combination of solid and liquid microbial inoculants (Gluconacetobacter, PSB and KSB). Data on N, P, K and S uptake by plant at different stages and yield were recorded. Results revealed that application of 100% RDF along with sett treatment with liquid Gluconacetobacter @ 1 lit ha-1, PSB @ 1 lit ha-1 and KSB @ 1 lit ha-1 resulted significantly the highest N, P, K and S uptake by plant and seed cane yield followed by 100% RDF + sett treatment with solid Gluconacetobacter @ 10 kg ha-1, PSB @ 1.25 kg ha-1 and KSB @ 1.25 kg ha-1.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 2
Claim · model-written summary
Liquid microbial inoculants with 100% RDF and sett treatment gave significantly the highest N, P, K and S uptake by sugarcane.
- Taxon
- Sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- application of 100% RDF along with sett treatment with liquid Gluconacetobacter @ 1 lit ha-1, PSB @ 1 lit ha-1 and KSB @ 1 lit ha-1e2
- Interactor
- Gluconacetobacter
Gluconacetobactere2symbiont - Second interactor
- PSBe2symbiont
- Outcome
- N, P, K and S uptake by plante2
- Direction
- higheste2
- Qualifier
- KSBe2
- Comparator
- 100% RDF + sett treatment with solid Gluconacetobacter @ 10 kg ha-1, PSB @ 1.25 kg ha-1 and KSB @ 1.25 kg ha-1e2
- Setting
- Perumallapalle, Tirupatie1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Sugarcane Short Crop”
e1“A field experiment was conducted at Agricultural Research Station, Perumallapalle, Tirupati”
e2“application of 100% RDF along with sett treatment with liquid Gluconacetobacter @ 1 lit ha-1, PSB @ 1 lit ha-1 and KSB @ 1 lit ha-1 resulted significantly the highest N, P, K and S uptake by plant and seed cane yield followed by 100% RDF + sett treatment with solid Gluconacetobacter @ 10 kg ha-1, PSB @ 1.25 kg ha-1 and KSB @ 1.25 kg ha-1”
Claim · model-written summary
Liquid microbial inoculants with 100% RDF and sett treatment gave the highest seed cane yield.
- Taxon
- Sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- application of 100% RDF along with sett treatment with liquid Gluconacetobacter @ 1 lit ha-1, PSB @ 1 lit ha-1 and KSB @ 1 lit ha-1e2
- Interactor
- GluconacetobacterGluconacetobactere2symbiont
- Second interactor
- PSBe2symbiont
- Outcome
- seed cane yielde2
- Direction
- higheste2
- Qualifier
- KSBe2
- Comparator
- 100% RDF + sett treatment with solid Gluconacetobacter @ 10 kg ha-1, PSB @ 1.25 kg ha-1 and KSB @ 1.25 kg ha-1e2
- Setting
- Perumallapalle, Tirupatie1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Sugarcane Short Crop”
e1“A field experiment was conducted at Agricultural Research Station, Perumallapalle, Tirupati”
e2“application of 100% RDF along with sett treatment with liquid Gluconacetobacter @ 1 lit ha-1, PSB @ 1 lit ha-1 and KSB @ 1 lit ha-1 resulted significantly the highest N, P, K and S uptake by plant and seed cane yield followed by 100% RDF + sett treatment with solid Gluconacetobacter @ 10 kg ha-1, PSB @ 1.25 kg ha-1 and KSB @ 1.25 kg ha-1”
The same questions in other papers
Gluconacetobacter · nutrient: content · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Gluconacetobacter · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
fertilization · nutrient: content · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
70 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
74 papers more in this group
See all 78 papers →fertilization · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
311 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- negative
342 papers more in this group
See all 346 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.