Abstract
Experiments were conducted at the Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore for four consecutive seasons during 1989 kharif to 1990 kharif to elucidate the response of nitrogen and irrigation levels under sole and intercropped maize Zea mays L. The first set of experiment showed a linear response of yield with an increase in nitrogen levels. The second set of experiment clearly revealed that the crop responded upto 187.5 kg N ha in both sole and intercropped situations. The intercrop did not cause either competitive depression or nitrogen transfer any level of irrigation or nitrogen. Irrigation at an IW/CPE ratio of 0.75 significantly increased the growth and yield of maize at all the levels of nitrogen and systems of cropping.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Maize yield responded linearly to increasing nitrogen levels.
- Treatment
- an increase in nitrogen levelse1
- Outcome
- yielde1
- Direction
- increasee1
- Qualifier
- linear responsee1
- Setting
- Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatoree0
Zea maysNot reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Experiments were conducted at the Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore for four consecutive seasons during 1989 kharif to 1990 kharif to elucidate the response of nitrogen and irrigation levels under sole and intercropped maize Zea mays L.”
e1“The first set of experiment showed a linear response of yield with an increase in nitrogen levels”
Claim · model-written summary
The maize crop responded to nitrogen up to 187.5 kg N ha in both sole and intercropped situations.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Experiments were conducted at the Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore for four consecutive seasons during 1989 kharif to 1990 kharif to elucidate the response of nitrogen and irrigation levels under sole and intercropped maize Zea mays L.”
e2“The second set of experiment clearly revealed that the crop responded upto 187.5 kg N ha in both sole and intercropped situations”
Claim · model-written summary
Intercropping did not cause competitive depression or nitrogen transfer in maize compared with sole cropping.
- Treatment
- intercrope3
- Outcome
- competitive depression or nitrogen transfere3
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede3
- Comparator
- solee2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Experiments were conducted at the Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore for four consecutive seasons during 1989 kharif to 1990 kharif to elucidate the response of nitrogen and irrigation levels under sole and intercropped maize Zea mays L.”
e2“The second set of experiment clearly revealed that the crop responded upto 187.5 kg N ha in both sole and intercropped situations”
e3“The intercrop did not cause either competitive depression or nitrogen transfer any level of irrigation or nitrogen”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation at an IW/CPE ratio of 0.75 significantly increased growth and yield of maize at all nitrogen levels and cropping systems.
- Treatment
- Irrigation at an IW/CPE ratio of 0.75e4
- Outcome
- growth and yielde4
- Direction
- increasede4
- Qualifier
- at all the levels of nitrogen and systems of croppinge4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Experiments were conducted at the Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore for four consecutive seasons during 1989 kharif to 1990 kharif to elucidate the response of nitrogen and irrigation levels under sole and intercropped maize Zea mays L.”
e4“Irrigation at an IW/CPE ratio of 0.75 significantly increased the growth and yield of maize at all the levels of nitrogen and systems of cropping”
The same questions in other papers
irrigation · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
790 papers in the same direction as this paper · 209 in the opposite direction · 16 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
1,012 papers more in this group
See all 1,016 papers →nitrogen · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
1,905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 234 in the opposite direction · 45 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- no effect
2,181 papers more in this group
See all 2,185 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.