Abstract
An experiment on “Effect of Plant growth regulators on fruit yield and fruit quality of Mango (Mangifera indica L.) cv. Amrapali” was conducted at the research plot, College of Horticulture, Chiplima during the year 2020-21 by using Randomized Block Design with three replications and ten treatments. Three concentrations of NAA i.e. 10, 20 and 30 ppm, three concentrations of GA3 i.e. 10, 20 and 30 ppm and three concentrations of 2,4-D i.e. 10, 20 and 30 ppm were applied at pea and marble stage of fruit. Research work was held on 07 years old plants of mango cv. Amrapali. Highest fruit weight (263.21g), and total yield of 18.34 kg per plant were recorded under T7. The minimum yield (4.41 kg per plant) was recorded under T1 (Control). The highest number of fruits per plant(69.67) and fruit yield (18.34 kg per plant ) was recorded under treatment T7 (30 ppm foliar application of GA3). The maximum TSS: acid ratio (115.81) was obtained with T10 (30 ppm concentration of 2,4-D) which was known to be superior from all other treatments. The minimum TSS: acid ratio (55.00) was estimated under T1. Ascorbic acid content of mango cv. Amrapali ranged from 39.34 mg/100g (T10) to 55.97 mg/100g (T1). The highest total sugar content (14.99 %) was estimated in T10 (2,4-D at 20 ppm) while the lowest total sugar content (10.42 %) was estimated in T1 (Control). T10 (30 ppm foliar applications of 2,4-D) showed maximum ascorbic acid content (55.97 mg/100g), while lowest (39.34 mg/100 g) was recorded under T1 (Control). It is concluded that the foliar application of 30 ppm GA3 (Gibberellic acid) and 30 ppm 2,4-D were found to be optimum concentrations which showed best results by increasing yield and fruit quality of mango cv. Amrapali.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 12
Claim · model-written summary
Treatment T7 produced the highest mango fruit weight, 263.21 g.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_from_India.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Highest fruit weight (263.21g), and total yield of 18.34 kg per plant were recorded under T7.”
t0“Mango”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatment T7 produced 18.34 kg fruit yield per plant.
- Taxon
- Mango
_from_India.jpg?width=60)
Mangifera indicat0 - Treatment
- T7e0
- Outcome
- total yielde0
- Value
- 18.34 kg per plante0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Highest fruit weight (263.21g), and total yield of 18.34 kg per plant were recorded under T7.”
t0“Mango”
Claim · model-written summary
Control T1 produced the minimum yield of 4.41 kg per plant.
- Taxon
- MangoMangifera indicat0
- Treatment
- T1 (Control)e0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- minimume0
- Value
- 4.41 kg per plante0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The minimum yield (4.41 kg per plant) was recorded under T1 (Control).”
t0“Mango”
Claim · model-written summary
T7, 30 ppm foliar GA3, yielded the most fruit per plant at 69.67.
- Taxon
- MangoMangifera indicat0
- Treatment
- T7 (30 ppm foliar application of GA3)e0
- Outcome
- number of fruits per plante0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 69.67e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The highest number of fruits per plant(69.67) and fruit yield (18.34 kg per plant ) was recorded under treatment T7 (30 ppm foliar application of GA3).”
t0“Mango”
Claim · model-written summary
T10, 30 ppm 2,4-D, gave the maximum TSS to acid ratio of 115.81.
- Taxon
- MangoMangifera indicat0
- Treatment
- T10 (30 ppm concentration of 2,4-D)e0
- Outcome
- TSS: acid ratioe0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 115.81e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The maximum TSS: acid ratio (115.81) was obtained with T10 (30 ppm concentration of 2,4-D)”
t0“Mango”
Claim · model-written summary
Control T1 gave the minimum TSS to acid ratio of 55.00.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The minimum TSS: acid ratio (55.00) was estimated under T1.”
t0“Mango”
Claim · model-written summary
The abstract reports ascorbic acid from 39.34 mg/100g at T10 to 55.97 mg/100g at T1.
- Taxon
- mangoMangifera indicae0
- Material
- Amrapalie0
- Outcome
- Ascorbic acid contente0
- Value
- 39.34 mg/100ge0
- Qualifier
- 55.97 mg/100g (T1)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Ascorbic acid content of mango cv. Amrapali ranged from 39.34 mg/100g (T10) to 55.97 mg/100g (T1).”
Claim · model-written summary
The abstract reports maximum sugar content of 14.99% at T10, described here as 20 ppm 2,4-D.
- Taxon
- MangoMangifera indicat0
- Treatment
- T10 (2,4-D at 20 ppm)e0
- Outcome
- total sugar contente0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 14.99 %e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The highest total sugar content (14.99 %) was estimated in T10 (2,4-D at 20 ppm)”
t0“Mango”
Claim · model-written summary
Control T1 had the lowest total sugar content at 10.42%.
- Taxon
- MangoMangifera indicat0
- Treatment
- T1 (Control)e0
- Outcome
- total sugar contente0
- Direction
- loweste0
- Value
- 10.42 %e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the lowest total sugar content (10.42 %) was estimated in T1 (Control).”
t0“Mango”
Claim · model-written summary
A later sentence instead reports maximum ascorbic acid of 55.97 mg/100g at T10.
- Taxon
- MangoMangifera indicat0
- Treatment
- T10 (30 ppm foliar applications of 2,4-D)e0
- Outcome
- ascorbic acid contente0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 55.97 mg/100ge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“T10 (30 ppm foliar applications of 2,4-D) showed maximum ascorbic acid content (55.97 mg/100g)”
t0“Mango”
Claim · model-written summary
The later sentence reports the lowest ascorbic acid at control T1, 39.34 mg/100 g.
- Taxon
- MangoMangifera indicat0
- Treatment
- T1 (Control)e0
- Direction
- loweste0
- Value
- 39.34 mg/100 ge0
Not reportedOutcome
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“lowest (39.34 mg/100 g) was recorded under T1 (Control).”
t0“Mango”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend 30 ppm GA3 and 30 ppm 2,4-D for mango yield and quality.
- Taxon
- mangoMangifera indicae0
- Material
- Amrapalie0
- Treatment
- 30 ppm GA3 (Gibberellic acid) and 30 ppm 2,4-De0
- Outcome
- yield and fruit qualitye0
- Direction
- increasinge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the foliar application of 30 ppm GA3 (Gibberellic acid) and 30 ppm 2,4-D were found to be optimum concentrations which showed best results by increasing yield and fruit quality of mango cv. Amrapali.”
The same questions in other papers
Gibberellic acid · yield · Mangifera indica (mango)Results differ
17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- negative
15 papers more in this group
See all 19 papers →2,4-D · quality: sugar starch · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
application · quality: phytochemicals · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results
15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
13 papers more in this group
See all 17 papers →application · yield · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results
79 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- negative
81 papers more in this group
See all 85 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.