Paper · 2023 · Agronomy

Quantitative and Qualitative Response of Fodder Maize to Use of Bulk and Nano-fertilizers in North Western Plains of India

Suryakanta Kashyap; Rakesh Kumar; Hardev Ram; et al.

5
claims
8
verbatim quotes
12
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Optimizing nutrient management strategies is crucial for enhancing the growth, yield, and nutritional quality of fodder maize (Zea mays) while minimizing environmental impacts. This study investigated the effects of innovative nitrogen (N) and zinc (Zn) management approaches on fodder maize production. Different combinations of nitrogen fertilizers, including conventional urea and nano-urea, were applied in conjunction with targeted foliar sprays of zinc sulfate (ZnSO4) and nano-zinc. The experiment was carried out in a Factorial Randomized Block design with four nitrogen management strategies (control N, 100% recommended nitrogen dose RDN through urea, 50% RDN through urea + two sprays of nano-urea at six and ten leaves stages, and 33.33% RDN through urea + two sprays of nano-urea at six and ten leaves stage) and four zinc management strategies (control Zn, soil application of ZnSO4, foliar application of ZnSO4, and foliar application of nano-Zn) which were replicated thrice. The study revealed that applying 50% of RDN through urea, along with dual foliar sprays of nano-urea, achieved comparable productivity to the 100% RDN through urea only. Among the Zn managements, both foliar and soil applications of conventional ZnSO4 recorded similar green and dry fodder yields, although foliar application of ZnSO4 was observed to be superior in terms of qualitative attributes. Maize subjected to the integrated nitrogen and zinc management strategy exhibited elevated protein content and reduced fiber fractions. These findings highlight the potential of nano-urea and foliar zinc application in enhancing both productivity and nutritional quality, while reducing dependence on conventional chemical fertilizers.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Half the recommended nitrogen dose with nano-urea sprays produced productivity comparable to the full dose of urea.

Taxon
fodder maize (Zea mays)Zea mayse1
Treatment
50% of RDN through urea, along with dual foliar sprays of nano-ureae0
Outcome
productivitye0
Direction
comparablee0
Comparator
100% RDN through urea onlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“applying 50% of RDN through urea, along with dual foliar sprays of nano-urea, achieved comparable productivity to the 100% RDN through urea only”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1160 · show in text ↑
e1

“fodder maize (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 113–136 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar and soil applications of zinc sulfate produced similar green and dry fodder yields.

Taxon
fodder maize (Zea mays)Zea mayse1
Treatment
foliare0
Outcome
green and dry fodder yieldse0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
soil applications of conventional ZnSO4e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both foliar and soil applications of conventional ZnSO4 recorded similar green and dry fodder yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1188–1288 · show in text ↑
e1

“fodder maize (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 113–136 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar zinc sulfate was superior for qualitative attributes.

Taxon
fodder maize (Zea mays)Zea mayse1
Treatment
foliar application of ZnSO4e0
Outcome
qualitative attributese0
Direction
superiore0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar application of ZnSO4 was observed to be superior in terms of qualitative attributes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1299–1389 · show in text ↑
e1

“fodder maize (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 113–136 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated nitrogen and zinc management elevated protein content.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayse0
Treatment
integrated nitrogen and zinc management strategye0
Outcome
protein contente0
Direction
elevatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maize subjected to the integrated nitrogen and zinc management strategy exhibited elevated protein content and reduced fiber fractions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1391–1525 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated nitrogen and zinc management reduced fiber fractions.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayse0
Treatment
integrated nitrogen and zinc management strategye0
Outcome
fiber fractionse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maize subjected to the integrated nitrogen and zinc management strategy exhibited elevated protein content and reduced fiber fractions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1391–1525 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

42 papers: 37 positive, 5 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

zinc atom · quality: grain · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 21 positive, 2 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

nitrogen · quality: grain · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

72 papers: 59 positive, 13 negative or no effect

58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

68 papers more in this group

See all 72 papers →

nitrogen · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

181 papers: 164 positive, 17 negative or no effect

163 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

177 papers more in this group

See all 181 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.