Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the growth curve, biomass and N accumulation in aboveground sugarcane as a function of nitrogen doses applied by subsurface drip irrigation during the crop growth cycle. The experiment was developed under field conditions Jau city, São Paulo state, Brazil. The treatments were four nitrogen doses – namely 50, 100, 150 and 200 kg ha-1 N – in urea form, in addition to a control treatment (without N), with completely randomized block and four repetitions. The N doses were applied gradually by subsurface drip irrigation spread throughout the sugarcane crop cycle. Biometrics and physiologic parameters and biomass accumulation were evaluated at five sampling times. Linear and quadratic responses of these parameters were verified as a function of N application. Elevating the N dose from 100 to 200 kg ha-1 increased the biomass and the N accumulation of sugarcane above ground by 20 Mg ha-1 and 95 kg ha-1, respectively. The nitrogen fertilization applied by subsurface drip irrigation increased the biomass and N accumulation of aboveground sugarcane, as well as the production rate of all parameters. The gap between maximum biomass accumulation rate (BAR) and nitrogen accumulation rate (NAR) was smooth due drip irrigation management. The irrigation management combined with better plant nutrition show highest results to biomass production
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Biometric, physiological and biomass parameters showed linear and quadratic responses to nitrogen application.
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Verbatim
e0“Linear and quadratic responses of these parameters were verified as a function of N application”
t0“sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
Raising nitrogen from 100 to 200 kg ha-1 increased aboveground biomass by 20 Mg ha-1.
Verbatim
e0“Elevating the N dose from 100 to 200 kg ha-1 increased the biomass and the N accumulation of sugarcane above ground by 20 Mg ha-1 and 95 kg ha-1, respectively”
t0“sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
Raising nitrogen from 100 to 200 kg ha-1 increased aboveground nitrogen accumulation by 95 kg ha-1.
Verbatim
e0“Elevating the N dose from 100 to 200 kg ha-1 increased the biomass and the N accumulation of sugarcane above ground by 20 Mg ha-1 and 95 kg ha-1, respectively”
t0“sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen fertigation increased aboveground sugarcane biomass and nitrogen accumulation.
- Taxon
- sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- nitrogen fertilization applied by subsurface drip irrigatione0
- Outcome
- biomass and N accumulation of aboveground sugarcanee0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“The nitrogen fertilization applied by subsurface drip irrigation increased the biomass and N accumulation of aboveground sugarcane, as well as the production rate of all parameters”
t0“sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen fertigation increased the production rate of measured parameters.
- Taxon
- sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- nitrogen fertilization applied by subsurface drip irrigatione0
- Outcome
- production rate of all parameterse0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“The nitrogen fertilization applied by subsurface drip irrigation increased the biomass and N accumulation of aboveground sugarcane, as well as the production rate of all parameters”
t0“sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
Drip irrigation management smoothed the gap between maximum biomass and nitrogen accumulation rates.
- Taxon
- sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- drip irrigation managemente0
- Outcome
- gap between maximum biomass accumulation rate (BAR) and nitrogen accumulation rate (NAR)e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Verbatim
e0“The gap between maximum biomass accumulation rate (BAR) and nitrogen accumulation rate (NAR) was smooth due drip irrigation management”
t0“sugarcane”
The same questions in other papers
irrigation · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
50 papers more in this group
See all 54 papers →irrigation · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- no effect
138 papers more in this group
See all 142 papers →fertilization · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
143 papers more in this group
See all 147 papers →fertilization · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
311 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- negative
342 papers more in this group
See all 346 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.