Paper · 2023 · Plants

Using the Aqueous Phase Produced from Hydrothermal Carbonization Process of Brown Seaweed to Improve the Growth of Phaseolus vulgaris

Damiano Spagnuolo; Viviana Bressi; Maria Teresa Chiofalo; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
13
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Seaweeds are considered a biomass for third-generation biofuel, and hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) is a valuable process for efficiently disposing of the excess of macroalgae biomass for conversion into multiple value-added products. However, the HTC process produces a liquid phase to be disposed of. The present study aims to investigate the effects of seed-priming treatment with three HTC-discarded liquid phases (namely AHL180, AHL240, and AHL300), obtained from different experimental procedures, on seed germination and plant growth and productivity of Phaseolus vulgaris L. To disentangle the osmotic effects from the use of AHL, isotonic solutions of polyethylene glycol (PEG) 6000 have also been tested. Seed germination was not affected by AHL seed-priming treatment. In contrast, PEG-treated samples showed significantly lower seed germination success. AHL-treated samples showed changes in plant biomass: higher shoot biomass was recorded especially in AHL180 samples. Conversely, AHL240 and AHL300 samples showed higher root biomass. The higher plant biomass values recorded in AHL-treated samples were the consequence of higher values of photosynthesis rate and water use efficiency, which, in turn, were related to higher stomatal density. Recorded data strongly support the hypothesis of the AHL solution reuse in agriculture in the framework of resource management and circular green economy.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed germination of Phaseolus vulgaris was not affected by AHL seed-priming treatment.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
AHL seed-priming treatmente0
Outcome
Seed germinatione0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed germination was not affected by AHL seed-priming treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 716–779 · show in text ↑
t0

“Phaseolus vulgaris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PEG-treated samples showed significantly lower seed germination success.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
PEG-treatede0
Outcome
seed germination successe0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PEG-treated samples showed significantly lower seed germination success”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–865 · show in text ↑
t0

“Phaseolus vulgaris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot biomass was higher in AHL180-primed samples.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
AHL180e0
Outcome
shoot biomasse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher shoot biomass was recorded especially in AHL180 samples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 920–982 · show in text ↑
t0

“Phaseolus vulgaris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root biomass was higher in AHL240-primed samples.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
AHL240e0
Outcome
root biomasse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AHL240 and AHL300 samples showed higher root biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1048 · show in text ↑
t0

“Phaseolus vulgaris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root biomass was higher in AHL300-primed samples.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
AHL300e0
Outcome
root biomasse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AHL240 and AHL300 samples showed higher root biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1048 · show in text ↑
t0

“Phaseolus vulgaris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–133 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attribute the higher plant biomass of AHL-treated samples to higher photosynthesis rate and water use efficiency, related to higher stomatal density.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
AHL-treated samplese0
Outcome
higher plant biomass valuese0
Qualifier
consequence of higher values of photosynthesis rate and water use efficiencye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The higher plant biomass values recorded in AHL-treated samples were the consequence of higher values of photosynthesis rate and water use efficiency, which, in turn, were related to higher stomatal density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1050–1256 · show in text ↑
t0

“Phaseolus vulgaris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–133 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors state that the data strongly support reuse of the AHL solution in agriculture.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarist0
Outcome
AHL solution reuse in agriculturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Recorded data strongly support the hypothesis of the AHL solution reuse in agriculture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1258–1344 · show in text ↑
t0

“Phaseolus vulgaris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–133 · show in text ↑

drought · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results differ

65 papers: 6 positive, 59 negative or no effect

58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

61 papers more in this group

See all 65 papers →

seed treatment · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 36 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.