Abstract
Abstract. Potatoes benefit from irrigation management because of the significant effect of irrigation on both yield and quality. A shallow root zone combined with daily evapotranspiration makes precise irrigation of potatoes difficult. Not watering the potatoes sufficiently can result in yield loss and cause misshapen tubers, vascular necrosis, or hollow heart defects. Improper irrigation schedules or unnecessary irrigation can waste resources, but can also increase the potential risk of plant diseases. Plant disease can substantially reduce yield and quality of product, and even more importantly impact it during the storage, which are negatively affecting the sustainability and economics of production. Therefore, proper irrigation management is important to maximize water use efficiency while minimizing the risk of plant disease. Sensor technology can help to manage irrigation properly, but only 7% of farms in Michigan use it. This project focused on understanding the effects of an IoT (Internet of Things) sensor-based irrigation scheduling method in irrigated potato farms through demonstration. The fields were divided into two sections to demonstrate grower‘s traditional irrigation strategy and IoT sensor-based irrigation scheduling. Multiple sensor monitoring systems were installed to monitor soil moisture levels, leaf wetness duration, irrigation amount, precipitation, air temperature, and relative humidity. Plant diseases including white mold incidence and index, early blight incidence and severity, early die incidence and index, were monitored. In addition, potato yields (cwt/acre) and quality, such as specific gravity, vascular discoloration, internal brown spot, common scab, rhizoctonia black scurf, were observed. Based on the observation from 2022, the team has found that the IoT sensor-based irrigation scheduling helped to save about 1 inch of application in one of the demonstration field, while maintaining a similar average yield as the grower‘s existing irrigation strategy (crop condition and regular schedule). This led to increasing Irrigation Water Use Efficiency (IWUE); IoT sensor-based irrigation scheduling method and growers‘s traditional irrigation strategy were 33.2 cwt/acre/in and 28.6 cwt/acre/in, respectively. Furthermore, no consistent differences were detected between irrigation programs based on tuber size profiles, quality metrics, or blemish diseases in samples from the demonstration fields.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
IoT scheduling saved about 1 inch of irrigation in one demonstration field.
- Taxon
- Potato
Solanum tuberosumt0 - Treatment
- IoT sensor-based irrigation schedulinge0
- Outcome
- applicatione0
- Direction
- savee0
- Value
- about 1 inche0
- Comparator
- grower‘s existing irrigation strategye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“IoT sensor-based irrigation scheduling helped to save about 1 inch of application in one of the demonstration field, while maintaining a similar average yield as the grower‘s existing irrigation strategy”
t0“Potato”
Claim · model-written summary
Average potato yield was similar under IoT and grower irrigation strategies.
- Taxon
- Potato
Solanum tuberosumt0 - Treatment
- IoT sensor-based irrigation schedulinge0
- Outcome
- average yielde0
- Direction
- similare0
- Comparator
- grower‘s existing irrigation strategye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“IoT sensor-based irrigation scheduling helped to save about 1 inch of application in one of the demonstration field, while maintaining a similar average yield as the grower‘s existing irrigation strategy”
t0“Potato”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation water use efficiency was 33.2 cwt/acre/in with IoT scheduling, versus 28.6 cwt/acre/in with grower practice.
- Taxon
- Potato
Solanum tuberosumt0 - Treatment
- IoT sensor-based irrigation scheduling methode0
- Outcome
- Irrigation Water Use Efficiencye0
- Direction
- increasinge0
- Value
- 33.2 cwt/acre/ine0
- Qualifier
- 28.6 cwt/acre/ine0
- Comparator
- growers‘s traditional irrigation strategye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“increasing Irrigation Water Use Efficiency (IWUE); IoT sensor-based irrigation scheduling method and growers‘s traditional irrigation strategy were 33.2 cwt/acre/in and 28.6 cwt/acre/in, respectively.”
t0“Potato”
Claim · model-written summary
Tuber size profiles, quality metrics and blemish diseases showed no consistent differences between irrigation programs.
- Taxon
- Potato
Solanum tuberosumt0 - Treatment
- irrigation programse0
- Outcome
- tuber size profiles, quality metrics, or blemish diseasese0
- Direction
- no consistent differencese0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“no consistent differences were detected between irrigation programs based on tuber size profiles, quality metrics, or blemish diseases in samples from the demonstration fields.”
t0“Potato”
The same questions in other papers
irrigation · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results differ
16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 75 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
88 papers more in this group
See all 92 papers →irrigation · quality: general · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →irrigation · physiology: water · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results
20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
21 papers more in this group
See all 25 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.