Paper · 2023 · 2023 Omaha, Nebraska July 9-12, 2023

Improving Irrigation and Disease Management in Irrigated Potato Fields using IoT-based Sensor Technology

Younsuk Dong; Jill Check; Jaime Willbur; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
7
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract. Potatoes benefit from irrigation management because of the significant effect of irrigation on both yield and quality. A shallow root zone combined with daily evapotranspiration makes precise irrigation of potatoes difficult. Not watering the potatoes sufficiently can result in yield loss and cause misshapen tubers, vascular necrosis, or hollow heart defects. Improper irrigation schedules or unnecessary irrigation can waste resources, but can also increase the potential risk of plant diseases. Plant disease can substantially reduce yield and quality of product, and even more importantly impact it during the storage, which are negatively affecting the sustainability and economics of production. Therefore, proper irrigation management is important to maximize water use efficiency while minimizing the risk of plant disease. Sensor technology can help to manage irrigation properly, but only 7% of farms in Michigan use it. This project focused on understanding the effects of an IoT (Internet of Things) sensor-based irrigation scheduling method in irrigated potato farms through demonstration. The fields were divided into two sections to demonstrate grower‘s traditional irrigation strategy and IoT sensor-based irrigation scheduling. Multiple sensor monitoring systems were installed to monitor soil moisture levels, leaf wetness duration, irrigation amount, precipitation, air temperature, and relative humidity. Plant diseases including white mold incidence and index, early blight incidence and severity, early die incidence and index, were monitored. In addition, potato yields (cwt/acre) and quality, such as specific gravity, vascular discoloration, internal brown spot, common scab, rhizoctonia black scurf, were observed. Based on the observation from 2022, the team has found that the IoT sensor-based irrigation scheduling helped to save about 1 inch of application in one of the demonstration field, while maintaining a similar average yield as the grower‘s existing irrigation strategy (crop condition and regular schedule). This led to increasing Irrigation Water Use Efficiency (IWUE); IoT sensor-based irrigation scheduling method and growers‘s traditional irrigation strategy were 33.2 cwt/acre/in and 28.6 cwt/acre/in, respectively. Furthermore, no consistent differences were detected between irrigation programs based on tuber size profiles, quality metrics, or blemish diseases in samples from the demonstration fields.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IoT scheduling saved about 1 inch of irrigation in one demonstration field.

Treatment
IoT sensor-based irrigation schedulinge0
Outcome
applicatione0
Direction
savee0
Value
about 1 inche0
Comparator
grower‘s existing irrigation strategye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“IoT sensor-based irrigation scheduling helped to save about 1 inch of application in one of the demonstration field, while maintaining a similar average yield as the grower‘s existing irrigation strategy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1816–2019 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average potato yield was similar under IoT and grower irrigation strategies.

Treatment
IoT sensor-based irrigation schedulinge0
Outcome
average yielde0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
grower‘s existing irrigation strategye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“IoT sensor-based irrigation scheduling helped to save about 1 inch of application in one of the demonstration field, while maintaining a similar average yield as the grower‘s existing irrigation strategy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1816–2019 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation water use efficiency was 33.2 cwt/acre/in with IoT scheduling, versus 28.6 cwt/acre/in with grower practice.

Treatment
IoT sensor-based irrigation scheduling methode0
Outcome
Irrigation Water Use Efficiencye0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
33.2 cwt/acre/ine0
Qualifier
28.6 cwt/acre/ine0
Comparator
growers‘s traditional irrigation strategye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing Irrigation Water Use Efficiency (IWUE); IoT sensor-based irrigation scheduling method and growers‘s traditional irrigation strategy were 33.2 cwt/acre/in and 28.6 cwt/acre/in, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2071–2271 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tuber size profiles, quality metrics and blemish diseases showed no consistent differences between irrigation programs.

Treatment
irrigation programse0
Outcome
tuber size profiles, quality metrics, or blemish diseasese0
Direction
no consistent differencese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no consistent differences were detected between irrigation programs based on tuber size profiles, quality metrics, or blemish diseases in samples from the demonstration fields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2285–2461 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–63 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results differ

92 papers: 75 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 75 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

88 papers more in this group

See all 92 papers →

irrigation · quality: general · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 5 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 21 positive, 4 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.