Paper · 2023 · IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science

Impact of Humic Acid and some Pre and Post-Harvest Treatments in Improving Storage Behaviour of Hot Pepper Fruits (Capsicum annuum L.) Hybrid Barbarian F1

Laila Turki Fadala; Dhia Ahmed Taain; Fatima Ali Hassan

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract The experiment was carried out during the 2020-2022 growing seasons in one of the unheated greenhouses at Dhi Qar University, south of Iraq, in order to investigate the impact of adding humic acid, pre and post-harvest treatments and their interaction in the storage behavior of hot pepper fruits hybrid Barbarian F1. Factorial experiment consisted of three factors which were the possible combinations of three concentrations of humic acid 0, 1, 2 g. l −1 and five pre and post-harvest treatments which were aqueous extract of jujube leaves at a concentration of (75) g. l −1 , aqueous extract of pomegranate peels at a concentration of 5 ml. l −1 , calcium at a concentration of 1.5 ml. l −1 , arginine acid at a concentration of 200 mg. l −1 in addition to control treatment (distilled water only). Fruits packed into polyethylene bags of 1 kg capacity containing 8 holes of 5 mm diameter and stored at a temperature of 10 ° C in a refrigerated incubator for two weeks. The experiment was designed out according to C.R.D design with three replicates. The results were analyzed by the analysis of variance and mean values were compared using the Revised Least Important Difference Test at 0.05 probability. Results showed that the fruits treated with humic acid at a concentration of 1 and 2 g.l −1 was superior to control in reducing the percentage of decay and retaining the highest content of vitamin C, total soluble solids, capsaicin and phenolic substances. As for the effect of the type of treatments, the fruits treated with calcium recorded the lowest percentage of decay compared to the rest of the treatments in both seasons. The soaking method outperformed compared to spraying one in retaining fruits content of vitamin C. the most interactions among studied factors were significant in their effect on the most parameters.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid at humic acid at a concentration of 1 reduced fruit decay.

Taxon
Hot Pepper Fruits (Capsicum annuum L.)Capsicum annuumt0
Material
Barbarian F1t0
Treatment
humic acid at a concentration of 1e0
Outcome
percentage of decaye0
Direction
reducinge0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruits treated with humic acid at a concentration of 1 and 2 g.l −1 was superior to control in reducing the percentage of decay and retaining the highest content of vitamin C, total soluble solids, capsaicin and phenolic substances.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1242–1474 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hot Pepper Fruits (Capsicum annuum L.) Hybrid Barbarian F1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–154 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid at 2 g.l −1 reduced fruit decay.

Taxon
Hot Pepper Fruits (Capsicum annuum L.)Capsicum annuumt0
Material
Barbarian F1t0
Treatment
2 g.l −1e0
Outcome
percentage of decaye0
Direction
reducinge0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruits treated with humic acid at a concentration of 1 and 2 g.l −1 was superior to control in reducing the percentage of decay and retaining the highest content of vitamin C, total soluble solids, capsaicin and phenolic substances.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1242–1474 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hot Pepper Fruits (Capsicum annuum L.) Hybrid Barbarian F1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–154 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid preserved high vitamin C.

Taxon
Hot Pepper Fruits (Capsicum annuum L.)Capsicum annuumt0
Treatment
humic acid at a concentration of 1 and 2 g.l −1e0
Outcome
vitamin Ce0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruits treated with humic acid at a concentration of 1 and 2 g.l −1 was superior to control in reducing the percentage of decay and retaining the highest content of vitamin C, total soluble solids, capsaicin and phenolic substances.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1242–1474 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hot Pepper Fruits (Capsicum annuum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–134 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid preserved high total soluble solids.

Taxon
Hot Pepper Fruits (Capsicum annuum L.)Capsicum annuumt0
Treatment
humic acid at a concentration of 1 and 2 g.l −1e0
Outcome
total soluble solidse0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruits treated with humic acid at a concentration of 1 and 2 g.l −1 was superior to control in reducing the percentage of decay and retaining the highest content of vitamin C, total soluble solids, capsaicin and phenolic substances.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1242–1474 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hot Pepper Fruits (Capsicum annuum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–134 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid preserved high capsaicin.

Taxon
Hot Pepper Fruits (Capsicum annuum L.)Capsicum annuumt0
Treatment
humic acid at a concentration of 1 and 2 g.l −1e0
Outcome
capsaicine0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruits treated with humic acid at a concentration of 1 and 2 g.l −1 was superior to control in reducing the percentage of decay and retaining the highest content of vitamin C, total soluble solids, capsaicin and phenolic substances.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1242–1474 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hot Pepper Fruits (Capsicum annuum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–134 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid preserved high phenolic substances.

Taxon
Hot Pepper Fruits (Capsicum annuum L.)Capsicum annuumt0
Treatment
humic acid at a concentration of 1 and 2 g.l −1e0
Outcome
phenolic substancese0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruits treated with humic acid at a concentration of 1 and 2 g.l −1 was superior to control in reducing the percentage of decay and retaining the highest content of vitamin C, total soluble solids, capsaicin and phenolic substances.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1242–1474 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hot Pepper Fruits (Capsicum annuum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–134 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium-treated fruits had the lowest decay.

Taxon
Hot Pepper Fruits (Capsicum annuum L.)Capsicum annuumt0
Treatment
calciume0
Outcome
percentage of decaye0
Direction
loweste0
Qualifier
both seasonse0
Comparator
the rest of the treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the fruits treated with calcium recorded the lowest percentage of decay compared to the rest of the treatments in both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1520–1647 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hot Pepper Fruits (Capsicum annuum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–134 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soaking better retained vitamin C than spraying.

Taxon
Hot Pepper Fruits (Capsicum annuum L.)Capsicum annuumt0
Treatment
soaking methode0
Outcome
fruits content of vitamin Ce0
Direction
outperformede0
Comparator
spraying onee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The soaking method outperformed compared to spraying one in retaining fruits content of vitamin C.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1648–1746 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hot Pepper Fruits (Capsicum annuum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–134 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Most studied factor interactions significantly affected most parameters.

Taxon
Hot Pepper Fruits (Capsicum annuum L.)Capsicum annuumt0
Treatment
interactions among studied factorse0
Outcome
most parameterse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the most interactions among studied factors were significant in their effect on the most parameters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1747–1847 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hot Pepper Fruits (Capsicum annuum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–134 · show in text ↑

calcium atom · disease · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 6 positive, 4 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

other · disease · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

other · quality: phytochemicals · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

other · quality: sugar starch · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

application · quality: phytochemicals · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.