Paper · 2017 · HortScience

Plastic-mulched Bell Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) Plant Growth and Fruit Yield and Quality as Influenced by Irrigation Rate and Calcium Fertilization

Juan Carlos Díaz-Pérez; James E. Hook

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
19
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Bell pepper ( Capsicum annuum L.) plants have a high demand for water and nutrients. Water stress on bell pepper is associated with reduced yields and incidence of blossom-end rot (BER). High irrigation rates are commonly applied to maximize yields. Excessive irrigation rates, however, may negatively affect bell pepper plants. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of irrigation rates and calcium fertilization on plant growth and fruit yield and quality. Trials were conducted in the spring of 2001, 2003, and 2005 at the University of Georgia, Tifton Campus. Drip-irrigated bell pepper (‘Camelot’ or ‘Stiletto’) plants were grown on black plastic mulch. Plants were irrigated with rates that ranged from 33% to 167% of the rate of crop evapotranspiration (ETc). Results showed that irrigation at 70% ETc (2001), 67% ETc (2003), and 50% ETc (2003) were sufficient to maximize vegetative growth and fruit yield and provided yields similar to those at 100% ETc. Leaf net photosynthesis and stomatal conductance ( g S ) were reduced, and incidence of BER was increased with reduced irrigation rates (33% and 67% ETc). Incidences of soilborne diseases ( Pythium spp. and Phytophtora capsici ) tended to increase in plants receiving excessive irrigation rates (167% ETc). Irrigation rate also affected fruit quality; incidence of BER and fruit soluble solids were both increased at 33% ETc. Calcium fertilization had no effect on soil water content (SWC), plant growth, and incidence of soilborne diseases, and an inconsistent effect on fruit yield and incidence of BER. In conclusion, there is potential for use of irrigation at rates below 100% ETc. Reduced irrigation diminished the volumes of water applied and provided fruit yields similar to those at 100% ETc. Excessive irrigation rates (167% ETc or above) wasted water and resulted in both higher incidences of soilborne diseases and reduced bell pepper yields.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced irrigation rates maximized vegetative growth and fruit yield similarly to 100% ETc.

Taxon
Bell Peppert0
Treatment
irrigation at 70% ETc (2001), 67% ETc (2003), and 50% ETc (2003)e0
Outcome
vegetative growth and fruit yielde0
Direction
maximizee0
Comparator
100% ETce0

Verbatim

t0

“Bell Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–48 · show in text ↑
e0

“irrigation at 70% ETc (2001), 67% ETc (2003), and 50% ETc (2003) were sufficient to maximize vegetative growth and fruit yield and provided yields similar to those at 100% ETc.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–980 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced irrigation reduced leaf net photosynthesis and stomatal conductance.

Taxon
Bell Peppert0
Treatment
reduced irrigation rates (33% and 67% ETc)e0
Outcome
Leaf net photosynthesis and stomatal conductance ( g S )e0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Bell Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–48 · show in text ↑
e0

“Leaf net photosynthesis and stomatal conductance ( g S ) were reduced, and incidence of BER was increased with reduced irrigation rates (33% and 67% ETc).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 981–1135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced irrigation increased blossom-end rot incidence.

Taxon
Bell Peppert0
Treatment
reduced irrigation rates (33% and 67% ETc)e0
Outcome
incidence of BERe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Bell Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–48 · show in text ↑
e0

“incidence of BER was increased with reduced irrigation rates (33% and 67% ETc).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Excess irrigation tended to increase soilborne disease incidence.

Taxon
Bell Peppert0
Treatment
excessive irrigation rates (167% ETc)e0
Interactor
Pythium spp.Pythiume0pathogen
Second interactor
Phytophtora capsicie0pathogen
Outcome
Incidences of soilborne diseasese0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
tended to increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pythium
Pythium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Doc. RNDr. Josef Reischig, CSc. · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bell Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–48 · show in text ↑
e0

“Incidences of soilborne diseases ( Pythium spp. and Phytophtora capsici ) tended to increase in plants receiving excessive irrigation rates (167% ETc).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1136–1287 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 33% ETc, blossom-end rot incidence increased.

Taxon
Bell Peppert0
Treatment
33% ETce0
Outcome
incidence of BERe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Bell Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–48 · show in text ↑
e0

“incidence of BER and fruit soluble solids were both increased at 33% ETc.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1333–1406 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 33% ETc, fruit soluble solids increased.

Taxon
Bell Peppert0
Treatment
33% ETce0
Outcome
fruit soluble solidse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Bell Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–48 · show in text ↑
e0

“incidence of BER and fruit soluble solids were both increased at 33% ETc.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1333–1406 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium fertilization had no effect on soil water content and plant growth.

Taxon
Bell Peppert0
Treatment
Calcium fertilizatione0
Outcome
soil water content (SWC), plant growthe0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Bell Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–48 · show in text ↑
e0

“Calcium fertilization had no effect on soil water content (SWC), plant growth, and incidence of soilborne diseases, and an inconsistent effect on fruit yield and incidence of BER.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1407–1586 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium fertilization had no effect on soilborne disease incidence.

Taxon
Bell Peppert0
Treatment
Calcium fertilizatione0
Outcome
incidence of soilborne diseasese0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Bell Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–48 · show in text ↑
e0

“Calcium fertilization had no effect on soil water content (SWC), plant growth, and incidence of soilborne diseases, and an inconsistent effect on fruit yield and incidence of BER.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1407–1586 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium fertilization had inconsistent effects on fruit yield and blossom-end rot incidence.

Taxon
Bell Peppert0
Treatment
Calcium fertilizatione0
Outcome
fruit yield and incidence of BERe0
Qualifier
inconsistent effecte0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

t0

“Bell Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–48 · show in text ↑
e0

“Calcium fertilization had no effect on soil water content (SWC), plant growth, and incidence of soilborne diseases, and an inconsistent effect on fruit yield and incidence of BER.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1407–1586 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Excessive irrigation reduced bell pepper yields.

Taxon
bell peppere0
Treatment
Excessive irrigation rates (167% ETc or above)e0
Outcome
bell pepper yieldse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Bell Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–48 · show in text ↑
e0

“Excessive irrigation rates (167% ETc or above) wasted water and resulted in both higher incidences of soilborne diseases and reduced bell pepper yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1783–1935 · show in text ↑

calcium atom · soil: physics · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

calcium atom · disease · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 6 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

fertilization · soil: physics · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

irrigation · disease · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

fertilization · disease · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

irrigation · yield · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 44 positive, 17 negative or no effect

43 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

irrigation · physiology: photosynthesis · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.