Paper · 2016 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Crop establishment methods and Zn nutrition in Bt-cotton: Direct effects on system productivity, economic-efficiency and water-productivity in Bt-cotton-wheat cropping system and their residual effects on yield and Zn biofortification in wheat

TARUN PAUL; D S RANA; ANIL K CHOUDHARY; et al.

20
claims
25
verbatim quotes
13
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at New Delhi (India) during kharif and rabi seasons of 2013–14 and 2014–15 to assess the performance of 2 crop establishment methods (CEMs) of Bt-cotton [Direct sowing and transplanting] and 5 zinc (Zn) levels [0, 2.5, 5, 7.5 kg Zn/ha through zinc sulphate hepta hydrate (ZSHH) and 0.5% ZnSO4 (ZSHH) foliar spray at 60 and 90 days after planting] applied to Bt-cotton on the system productivity, production–efficiency, economic–efficiency and water–productivity of Bt-cotton–wheat cropping system; as well as their residual effects on succeeding wheat in a Bt-cotton–wheat cropping system (CWCS) in a semi–arid Indo–Gangetic Plains Region (IGPR). In succeeding wheat, the residual effects of Zn levels applied to cotton were also compared with direct effect of Zn applied to wheat by replacing the foliar Zn spray treatment of cotton with Zn @ 5 kg/ha in wheat. The results revealed that direct and residual effects of cotton CEMs were non–significant on yield attributes and yield of wheat. However, the residual effects of Zn @ 5 and 7.5 kg/ha were significant on yield attributes and yield of wheat. Direct effect of Zn @ 5 kg/ha applied in wheat was at par with residual effects of 5 and 7.5 kg Zn/ha applied to cotton. In general, wheat grain yield was enhanced by 12.6, 12.3 and 12.9% during 2013–14, and 9.9, 8.1 and 8.3% during 2014–15 over control due to direct and residual effect of 2.5, 5 and 7.5 kg Zn/ha, respectively. Similarly on wheat straw yield. The influence of cotton CEMs on CWCS system productivity was non–significant. However, direct and residual effects of Zn levels induced a marked variation in CWCS system productivity as well as residual Zn fertility. Successive increase in Zn levels from 0 to 5 kg/ha in cotton resulted in significant increase in system productivity; thereafter, application of Zn @ 7.5 kg/ha revealed a non–significant influence. On an average, CWCS system productivity enhanced by 7.7% due to direct effect of 5 kg Zn/ha applied to wheat, and by 4.8, 10 and 9.9% due to residual effect of 2.5, 5 and 7.5 kg Zn/ ha over control. With successive increase in Zn–levels to cotton, a significant Zn–enrichment of wheat grain and straw was also observed. Cotton CEMs exhibited a significant influence on Zn content and uptake in wheat straw but with non-significant influence on wheat grains. Again, cotton CEMs exhibited a non–significant influence on system production–efficiency (PE), economic–efficiency (EE) and profitability. On the other hand, successive increase in Zn levels to cotton resulted in perceptible increase in system PE and EE up to 5 kg Zn/ha. Foliar Zn spray to cotton and direct Zn application to wheat also exhibited significant increase in system PE and EE over control, but, this treatment was at par with direct and residual effects of 5 and 7.5 kg Zn/ha. There was a significant influence of CEMs and Zn levels on water–use–efficiency (WUE) and water–productivity (WP) in CWCS. Residual effects of 5 and 7.5 kg Zn/ ha applied to cotton resulted in significantly higher net returns (NR) and benefit: cost ratio (BCR). Direct effect of 5 kg Zn/ha to wheat also exhibited higher NR and BCR in CWCS over control and residual effect of 2.5 kg Zn/ha. Overall, successive increase in Zn–levels led to significant enhancement in system productivity, PE, EE and water productivity up to 5 kg Zn/ha. The residual effects of 5 and 7.5 kg Zn/ha applied to Bt-cotton exhibited a significant influence on productivity, profitability and Zn biofortification of succeeding wheat which also remained at par with direct application of 5 kg Zn/ha applied to wheat in a Bt-cotton–wheat cropping system in a semi–arid IGPR.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton establishment methods had a nonsignificant residual effect on wheat yield attributes and yield.

Treatment
cotton CEMse0
Outcome
yield attributes and yield of wheate0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“direct and residual effects of cotton CEMs were non–significant on yield attributes and yield of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–1023 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual 5 and 7.5 kg/ha Zn applications significantly affected wheat yield attributes and yield.

Treatment
Zn @ 5 and 7.5 kg/hae0
Outcome
yield attributes and yield of wheate0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“residual effects of Zn @ 5 and 7.5 kg/ha were significant on yield attributes and yield of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1038–1134 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Direct 5 kg/ha Zn on wheat performed at par with residual 5 and 7.5 kg/ha Zn on cotton.

Treatment
Zn @ 5 kg/ha applied in wheate0
Outcome
at pare0
Direction
at pare0
Comparator
residual effects of 5 and 7.5 kg Zn/ha applied to cottone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Direct effect of Zn @ 5 kg/ha applied in wheat was at par with residual effects of 5 and 7.5 kg Zn/ha applied to cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1136–1255 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 2.5 kg/ha Zn treatment raised 2013–14 wheat grain yield 12.6% over control.

Treatment
2.5e0
Outcome
wheat grain yielde0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
12.6e0
Qualifier
2013–14e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat grain yield was enhanced by 12.6, 12.3 and 12.9% during 2013–14, and 9.9, 8.1 and 8.3% during 2014–15 over control due to direct and residual effect of 2.5, 5 and 7.5 kg Zn/ha, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1269–1464 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 5 kg/ha Zn treatment raised 2013–14 wheat grain yield 12.3% over control.

Treatment
5 kg Zn/hae0
Outcome
wheat grain yielde0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
12.3e0
Qualifier
2013–14e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat grain yield was enhanced by 12.6, 12.3 and 12.9% during 2013–14, and 9.9, 8.1 and 8.3% during 2014–15 over control due to direct and residual effect of 2.5, 5 and 7.5 kg Zn/ha, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1269–1464 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 7.5 kg/ha Zn treatment raised 2013–14 wheat grain yield 12.9% over control.

Treatment
7.5 kg Zn/hae0
Outcome
wheat grain yielde0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
12.9%e0
Qualifier
2013–14e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat grain yield was enhanced by 12.6, 12.3 and 12.9% during 2013–14, and 9.9, 8.1 and 8.3% during 2014–15 over control due to direct and residual effect of 2.5, 5 and 7.5 kg Zn/ha, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1269–1464 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 2.5 kg/ha Zn treatment raised 2014–15 wheat grain yield 9.9% over control.

Treatment
2.5e0
Outcome
wheat grain yielde0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
9.9e0
Qualifier
2014–15e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat grain yield was enhanced by 12.6, 12.3 and 12.9% during 2013–14, and 9.9, 8.1 and 8.3% during 2014–15 over control due to direct and residual effect of 2.5, 5 and 7.5 kg Zn/ha, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1269–1464 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 5 kg/ha Zn treatment raised 2014–15 wheat grain yield 8.1% over control.

Treatment
5 kg Zn/hae0
Outcome
wheat grain yielde0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
8.1e0
Qualifier
2014–15e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat grain yield was enhanced by 12.6, 12.3 and 12.9% during 2013–14, and 9.9, 8.1 and 8.3% during 2014–15 over control due to direct and residual effect of 2.5, 5 and 7.5 kg Zn/ha, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1269–1464 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 7.5 kg/ha Zn treatment raised 2014–15 wheat grain yield 8.3% over control.

Treatment
7.5 kg Zn/hae0
Outcome
wheat grain yielde0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
8.3%e0
Qualifier
2014–15e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat grain yield was enhanced by 12.6, 12.3 and 12.9% during 2013–14, and 9.9, 8.1 and 8.3% during 2014–15 over control due to direct and residual effect of 2.5, 5 and 7.5 kg Zn/ha, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1269–1464 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton establishment methods had a nonsignificant effect on cropping-system productivity.

Taxon
Bt-cottont0
Treatment
cotton CEMse0
Outcome
CWCS system productivitye0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The influence of cotton CEMs on CWCS system productivity was non–significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1498–1574 · show in text ↑
t0

“in Bt-cotton:”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing Zn to 5 kg/ha on cotton significantly increased system productivity; 7.5 kg/ha had a nonsignificant further effect.

Treatment
Zn levels from 0 to 5 kg/hae0
Outcome
system productivitye0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
0e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Successive increase in Zn levels from 0 to 5 kg/ha in cotton resulted in significant increase in system productivity; thereafter, application of Zn @ 7.5 kg/ha revealed a non–significant influence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1715–1911 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Direct 5 kg Zn/ha to wheat enhanced system productivity 7.7% over control.

Treatment
5 kg Zn/ha applied to wheate0
Outcome
CWCS system productivitye0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
7.7%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CWCS system productivity enhanced by 7.7% due to direct effect of 5 kg Zn/ha applied to wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1928–2021 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual 2.5 kg Zn/ha to cotton enhanced system productivity 4.8%.

Treatment
2.5e0
Outcome
CWCS system productivitye0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
4.8e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CWCS system productivity enhanced by 7.7% due to direct effect of 5 kg Zn/ha applied to wheat, and by 4.8, 10 and 9.9% due to residual effect of 2.5, 5 and 7.5 kg Zn/ ha over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1928–2110 · show in text ↑
t0

“in Bt-cotton:”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual 5 kg Zn/ha to cotton enhanced system productivity 10%.

Treatment
5 kg Zn/ hae0
Outcome
CWCS system productivitye0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
10e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CWCS system productivity enhanced by 7.7% due to direct effect of 5 kg Zn/ha applied to wheat, and by 4.8, 10 and 9.9% due to residual effect of 2.5, 5 and 7.5 kg Zn/ ha over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1928–2110 · show in text ↑
t0

“in Bt-cotton:”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual 7.5 kg Zn/ha to cotton enhanced system productivity 9.9%.

Treatment
7.5 kg Zn/ hae0
Outcome
CWCS system productivitye0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
9.9%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CWCS system productivity enhanced by 7.7% due to direct effect of 5 kg Zn/ha applied to wheat, and by 4.8, 10 and 9.9% due to residual effect of 2.5, 5 and 7.5 kg Zn/ ha over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1928–2110 · show in text ↑
t0

“in Bt-cotton:”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing Zn levels to cotton significantly enriched wheat grain and straw Zn.

Treatment
increase in Zn–levels to cottone0
Outcome
Zn–enrichment of wheat grain and strawe0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With successive increase in Zn–levels to cotton, a significant Zn–enrichment of wheat grain and straw was also observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2112–2231 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton establishment methods significantly affected wheat-straw Zn content and uptake but not wheat-grain Zn.

Treatment
Cotton CEMse0
Outcome
Zn content and uptake in wheat strawe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton CEMs exhibited a significant influence on Zn content and uptake in wheat straw but with non-significant influence on wheat grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2233–2369 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton establishment methods had nonsignificant effects on system production and economic efficiency and profitability.

Taxon
Bt-cottont0
Treatment
cotton CEMse0
Outcome
system production–efficiency (PE), economic–efficiency (EE) and profitabilitye0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“cotton CEMs exhibited a non–significant influence on system production–efficiency (PE), economic–efficiency (EE) and profitability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2378–2508 · show in text ↑
t0

“in Bt-cotton:”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn levels up to 5 kg/ha increased system production and economic efficiency.

Treatment
Zn levels to cottone0
Outcome
system PE and EEe0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
up to 5 kg Zn/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“successive increase in Zn levels to cotton resulted in perceptible increase in system PE and EE up to 5 kg Zn/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2529–2641 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual 5 and 7.5 kg Zn/ha applications to cotton produced significantly higher net returns and benefit-cost ratios.

Treatment
5 and 7.5 kg Zn/ ha applied to cottone0
Outcome
net returns (NR) and benefit: cost ratio (BCR)e0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Residual effects of 5 and 7.5 kg Zn/ ha applied to cotton resulted in significantly higher net returns (NR) and benefit: cost ratio (BCR)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2984–3121 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

49 papers: 46 positive, 3 negative or no effect

45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

455 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

Gossypium hirsutum · organism · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.