Paper · 2001 · Indian Journal of Agronomy

Nitrogen fertilization of Bt cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system

B. GANGAIAH; I.P.S. AHLAWAT

12
claims
13
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during the rainy ( kharif) and winter ( rabi) seasons of 200607 and 200708 at New Delhi, to assess the performance of 3 cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.)wheat [ Tr iticum aestivum (L.) emend. Fiori & Paol.] systems as affected by nitrogen (N) fertilization. In cotton, treatments formed by combination of 3 cotton hybrids [2 Bt (MRC 6304 and RCH 317) and 1 non-Bt hybrid (LHH 144)] in main plot and 4 levels of N fertilization (0, 60, 120 and 180 kg/ha) in sub-plots were tested. In succeeding wheat, cotton treatments were further sub-divided to accommodate 3 levels of N fertilization (0, 60, and 120 kg N/ha). Pooled data revealed that 2 Bt cotton hybrids being at par gave 55.4% (2.99 tonnes/ha) higher seed-cotton yield (SCY) than non Bt cotton hybrid (1.93 tonnes/ha) and the cotton hybrids did not markedly alter the performance of succeeding wheat. How- ever, the system productivity (cotton-equivalent yield, CEY) of Bt cottonwheat was 24.2% (4.72 tonnes/ha) higher than the non-Bt cottonwheat system (3.80 tonnes/ha). The per cent contribution of Bt cotton to CEY of system (69.7) far exceeded that of non-Bt cotton (49.6). Both agronomic nitrogen-use efficiency (ANUE) and physiological nitrogen-use efficiency (PNUE) of Bt cotton and ANUE of succeeding wheat were higher than the non-Bt cotton and following wheat. Yield, N uptake of cotton, wheat and system increased with each successive increase of 60 kg N dose from 0 to 180 kg/ha. The N response of cotton was found to be quadratic with optimum dose of 173.0 kg/ha. ANUE and PNUE of cotton were the highest with 60 (5.73) and 120 kg N fertilization (17.05) and decreased thereafter with increasing N dose. Wheat crop responded to direct application of N up to 120 kg/ha. The currently recommended N input (300 kg/ha) of the non-Bt cotton (180 kg/ha)wheat (120 kg/ha) system can be reduced by 27.8 kg with adoption of MRC 6304 Bt cotton.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two Bt cotton hybrids gave 55.4% (2.99 tonnes/ha) higher seed-cotton yield than the non-Bt cotton hybrid.

Treatment
2 Bt cotton hybridse3
Outcome
seed-cotton yielde3
Direction
highere3
Value
55.4% (2.99 tonnes/ha)e3
Comparator
non Bt cotton hybride3
Setting
New Delhie2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“A field experiment was conducted during the rainy ( kharif) and winter ( rabi) seasons of 200607 and 200708 at New Delhi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–120 · show in text ↑
e3

“2 Bt cotton hybrids being at par gave 55.4% (2.99 tonnes/ha) higher seed-cotton yield (SCY) than non Bt cotton hybrid (1.93 tonnes/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 670–804 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bt cotton-wheat system productivity was 24.2% (4.72 tonnes/ha) higher than the non-Bt cotton-wheat system.

Treatment
Bt cottonwheate4
Outcome
system productivity (cotton-equivalent yield, CEY)e4
Direction
highere4
Value
24.2% (4.72 tonnes/ha)e4
Comparator
non-Bt cottonwheat systeme4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“the system productivity (cotton-equivalent yield, CEY) of Bt cottonwheat was 24.2% (4.72 tonnes/ha) higher than the non-Bt cottonwheat system (3.80 tonnes/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–1057 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The per cent contribution of Bt cotton to system CEY (69.7) far exceeded that of non-Bt cotton (49.6).

Treatment
Bt cottone5
Outcome
per cent contribution of Bt cotton to CEY of systeme5
Direction
far exceedede5
Value
69.7e5
Qualifier
49.6e5
Comparator
non-Bt cottone5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“The per cent contribution of Bt cotton to CEY of system (69.7) far exceeded that of non-Bt cotton (49.6)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1059–1163 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Agronomic and physiological nitrogen-use efficiency of Bt cotton were higher than those of non-Bt cotton.

Treatment
Bt cottone6
Outcome
agronomic nitrogen-use efficiency (ANUE) and physiological nitrogen-use efficiency (PNUE)e6
Direction
highere6
Comparator
non-Bt cottone6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Both agronomic nitrogen-use efficiency (ANUE) and physiological nitrogen-use efficiency (PNUE) of Bt cotton and ANUE of succeeding wheat were higher than the non-Bt cotton and following wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1165–1356 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Agronomic nitrogen-use efficiency of the succeeding wheat was higher than that of the following wheat after Bt cotton.

Treatment
Bt cottone6
Outcome
ANUEe6
Direction
highere6
Comparator
following wheate6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Both agronomic nitrogen-use efficiency (ANUE) and physiological nitrogen-use efficiency (PNUE) of Bt cotton and ANUE of succeeding wheat were higher than the non-Bt cotton and following wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1165–1356 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield and N uptake of cotton, wheat and the system increased with each 60 kg N dose increase from 0 to 180 kg/ha.

Treatment
60 kg N dose from 0 to 180 kg/hae7
Outcome
Yield, N uptake of cotton, wheat and systeme7
Direction
increasede7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“Yield, N uptake of cotton, wheat and system increased with each successive increase of 60 kg N dose from 0 to 180 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1358–1477 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton yield and N response were quadratic, with an optimum N dose of 173.0 kg/ha.

Outcome
optimum dosee0
Value
173.0 kg/hae0
Qualifier
quadratice0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The N response of cotton was found to be quadratic with optimum dose of 173.0 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1479–1562 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ANUE of cotton was highest at 60 kg N fertilization (5.73) and decreased thereafter with increasing N dose.

Treatment
N fertilizatione0
Outcome
ANUEe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
5.73e0
Qualifier
decreased thereafter with increasing N dosee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ANUE and PNUE of cotton were the highest with 60 (5.73) and 120 kg N fertilization (17.05) and decreased thereafter with increasing N dose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1564–1702 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PNUE of cotton was highest at 120 kg N fertilization (17.05) and decreased thereafter with increasing N dose.

Treatment
N fertilizatione0
Outcome
PNUEe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
17.05e0
Qualifier
decreased thereafter with increasing N dosee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ANUE and PNUE of cotton were the highest with 60 (5.73) and 120 kg N fertilization (17.05) and decreased thereafter with increasing N dose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1564–1702 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat responded to direct N application up to 120 kg/ha.

Outcome
responded to direct application of Ne0
Value
120 kg/hae0
Qualifier
up toe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat crop responded to direct application of N up to 120 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1704–1767 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The N input of the non-Bt cotton-wheat system can be reduced by 27.8 kg with adoption of MRC 6304 Bt cotton.

Treatment
adoption of MRC 6304 Bt cottone0
Outcome
N inpute0
Value
27.8 kge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The currently recommended N input (300 kg/ha) of the non-Bt cotton (180 kg/ha)wheat (120 kg/ha) system can be reduced by 27.8 kg with adoption of MRC 6304 Bt cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1769–1933 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton hybrids did not markedly alter the performance of succeeding wheat.

Treatment
cotton hybridse0
Outcome
performance of succeeding wheate0
Direction
did not markedly altere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the cotton hybrids did not markedly alter the performance of succeeding wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–886 · show in text ↑

Gossypium hirsutum · organism · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

transgenic · nutrient: efficiency · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

transgenic · nutrient: efficiency · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

transgenic · organism · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 27 positive, 3 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

transgenic · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

78 papers: 74 positive, 4 negative or no effect

73 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

74 papers more in this group

See all 78 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

343 papers: 286 positive, 57 negative or no effect

285 papers in the same direction as this paper · 53 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

339 papers more in this group

See all 343 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.