Paper · 2023 · Plants

Engaging Precision Phenotyping to Scrutinize Vegetative Drought Tolerance and Recovery in Chickpea Plant Genetic Resources

Madita Lauterberg; Henning Tschiersch; Roberto Papa; et al.

5
claims
12
verbatim quotes
14
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Precise and high-throughput phenotyping (HTP) of vegetative drought tolerance in chickpea plant genetic resources (PGR) would enable improved screening for genotypes with low relative loss of biomass formation and reliable physiological performance. It could also provide a basis to further decipher the quantitative trait drought tolerance and recovery and gain a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms. In the context of climate change and novel nutritional trends, legumes and chickpea in particular are becoming increasingly important because of their high protein content and adaptation to low-input conditions. The PGR of legumes represent a valuable source of genetic diversity that can be used for breeding. However, the limited use of germplasm is partly due to a lack of available characterization data. The development of HTP systems offers a perspective for the analysis of dynamic plant traits such as abiotic stress tolerance and can support the identification of suitable genetic resources with a potential breeding value. Sixty chickpea accessions were evaluated on an HTP system under contrasting water regimes to precisely evaluate growth, physiological traits, and recovery under optimal conditions in comparison to drought stress at the vegetative stage. In addition to traits such as Estimated Biovolume (EB), Plant Height (PH), and several color-related traits over more than forty days, photosynthesis was examined by chlorophyll fluorescence measurements on relevant days prior to, during, and after drought stress. With high data quality, a wide phenotypic diversity for adaptation, tolerance, and recovery to drought was recorded in the chickpea PGR panel. In addition to a loss of EB between 72% and 82% after 21 days of drought, photosynthetic capacity decreased by 16-28%. Color-related traits can be used as indicators of different drought stress stages, as they show the progression of stress.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chickpea estimated biovolume was lost by 72-82% after 21 days of drought compared with optimal conditions.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
21 days of droughte1
Outcome
loss of EBe1
Direction
losse1
Value
72% and 82%e1
Comparator
optimal conditionse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–98 · show in text ↑
e1

“In addition to a loss of EB between 72% and 82% after 21 days of drought, photosynthetic capacity decreased by 16-28%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1694–1811 · show in text ↑
e2

“recovery under optimal conditions in comparison to drought stress at the vegetative stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1195–1284 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photosynthetic capacity of chickpea decreased by 16-28% after 21 days of drought compared with optimal conditions.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
21 days of droughte1
Outcome
photosynthetic capacitye1
Direction
decreasede1
Value
16-28%e1
Comparator
optimal conditionse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–98 · show in text ↑
e1

“In addition to a loss of EB between 72% and 82% after 21 days of drought, photosynthetic capacity decreased by 16-28%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1694–1811 · show in text ↑
e2

“recovery under optimal conditions in comparison to drought stress at the vegetative stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1195–1284 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Color-related traits may serve as indicators of different drought stress stages in chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
drought stresse3
Outcome
progression of stresse3
Qualifier
as indicators of different drought stress stagese3

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–98 · show in text ↑
e3

“Color-related traits can be used as indicators of different drought stress stages, as they show the progression of stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1813–1934 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A wide phenotypic diversity for adaptation, tolerance and recovery to drought was recorded in the chickpea plant genetic resources panel.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material
chickpea PGR panele4
Outcome
phenotypic diversity for adaptation, tolerance, and recovery to droughte4
Qualifier
widee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–98 · show in text ↑
e4

“a wide phenotypic diversity for adaptation, tolerance, and recovery to drought was recorded in the chickpea PGR panel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1575–1692 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The high-throughput phenotyping system gave high data quality for chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Outcome
data qualitye5
Value
highe5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–98 · show in text ↑
e5

“With high data quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1551–1573 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: photosynthesis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

19 papers: 4 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.