Paper · 2023 · Journal of Horticultural Sciences

Manipulating female flower intensity in ‘Yu Her Pau’ Litchi by delayed winter pruning

J Chang; L Tang

6
claims
17
verbatim quotes
0
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

'Yu Her Pau’ litchi (Litchi chinensis) has excellent fruit quality. However, its production on Taiwan is limited by low productivity despite being regarded as a high-quality fruit. It is known that litchi’s leaves play a critical role in floral induction under low temperature. Thus, we hypothesized that the flower intensity in spring could be manipulated by altering the leaf quality in winter, thereby increasing crop load. In this pilot study, ‘Yu Her Pau’ trees were pruned in mid-December [early pruning (EP)], one of the common cultural practices carried out by growers in the region, as control or mid-January [late pruning (LP)]. This resulted in 50% and 100% canopy foliage for EP and LP trees, respectively, between mid-December and mid-January. At the peak blooming time in March, LP trees produced significantly more female flowers than EP trees (95.8 and 56.1/panicle, respectively) with no negative effects on initial fruit set number, fruitlet abscission, or fruit quality at harvest. Our results suggest additional mature leaves present on trees in mid-December onward may benefit litchi flower formation without affecting fruit retention. Thus, preserving leaves with delayed pruning might potentially mitigate the negative impacts of warmer winters due to climate change on litchi flowering.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late pruning left 100% canopy foliage versus 50% under early pruning between mid-December and mid-January.

Taxon
litchiLitchie1
Treatment
LPe0
Outcome
canopy foliagee0
Value
100%e0
Qualifier
50%e0
Comparator
EPe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Litchi
Litchi · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Luc Viatour · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This resulted in 50% and 100% canopy foliage for EP and LP trees, respectively, between mid-December and mid-January”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–755 · show in text ↑
e1

“'Yu Her Pau’ litchi (Litchi chinensis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Late-pruned trees produced significantly more female flowers than early-pruned trees, 95.8 versus 56.1 per panicle.

Taxon
litchiLitchie1
Treatment
LPe0
Outcome
female flowerse0
Direction
moree0
Value
95.8e0
Qualifier
56.1/paniclee0
Comparator
EPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Litchi
Litchi · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Luc Viatour · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“LP trees produced significantly more female flowers than EP trees (95.8 and 56.1/panicle, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–896 · show in text ↑
e1

“'Yu Her Pau’ litchi (Litchi chinensis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late pruning had no negative effect on initial fruit set number.

Taxon
litchiLitchie3
Treatment
LPe1
Outcome
initial fruit set numbere0
Direction
no negative effectse0
Comparator
EPe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Litchi
Litchi · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Luc Viatour · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with no negative effects on initial fruit set number, fruitlet abscission, or fruit quality at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–999 · show in text ↑
e1

“At the peak blooming time in March, LP trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–801 · show in text ↑
e2

“EP trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 850–858 · show in text ↑
e3

“'Yu Her Pau’ litchi (Litchi chinensis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late pruning had no negative effect on fruitlet abscission.

Taxon
litchiLitchie3
Treatment
LPe1
Outcome
fruitlet abscissione0
Direction
no negative effectse0
Comparator
EPe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Litchi
Litchi · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Luc Viatour · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with no negative effects on initial fruit set number, fruitlet abscission, or fruit quality at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–999 · show in text ↑
e1

“At the peak blooming time in March, LP trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–801 · show in text ↑
e2

“EP trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 850–858 · show in text ↑
e3

“'Yu Her Pau’ litchi (Litchi chinensis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late pruning had no negative effect on fruit quality at harvest.

Taxon
litchiLitchie3
Treatment
LPe1
Outcome
fruit quality at harveste0
Direction
no negative effectse0
Comparator
EPe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Litchi
Litchi · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Luc Viatour · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with no negative effects on initial fruit set number, fruitlet abscission, or fruit quality at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–999 · show in text ↑
e1

“At the peak blooming time in March, LP trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–801 · show in text ↑
e2

“EP trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 850–858 · show in text ↑
e3

“'Yu Her Pau’ litchi (Litchi chinensis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–38 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest preserving leaves with delayed pruning might mitigate warmer-winter effects on litchi flowering.

Taxon
litchiLitchie0
Outcome
preserving leaves with delayed pruninge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Litchi
Litchi · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Luc Viatour · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“preserving leaves with delayed pruning might potentially mitigate the negative impacts of warmer winters due to climate change on litchi flowering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1163–1309 · show in text ↑

pruning · yield · LitchiPositive and negative results

14 papers: 10 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

pruning · quality: grain · LitchiResults agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

pruning · growth · LitchiResults agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

pruning · phenology · LitchiResults agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.