Paper · 2023 · Selcuk Journal of Agricultural and Food Sciences

Determination of the effects of organic and chemical fertilization on grain yield and some agricultural characteristics of pea

Serdar Karataş; Ercan Ceyhan

14
claims
23
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Pea (Pisum sativum L.) plant, a legume species, is used as a vegetable for fresh consumption and frozen, canned or dried and processed and consumed as dry grain. The effects of organic fertilization, which is important for plant nutrition and soil fertility in pea cultivation, on grain yield and some agricultural characteristics were investigated. The experiment was carried out in the experiment field belonging to Selçuk University, Faculty of Agriculture, Prof. Dr. Abdülkadir AKÇİN Research and Application Station in 2021 according to the "Split Plots Experiment in Randomized Blocks" design with 3 replications. In the research, fertilizers were randomly placed in the main plots and varieties were randomly placed in the sub-plots. In the experiment, high yielding 16002, 16011, 16018, 16022 and Ultrello x Rondo genotypes suitable for fresh consumption and registered Betagreen pea variety were used as materials. Grain yield, some agronomic traits, protein yield and protein ratio were analyzed in the study. It was determined that the effects of chemical fertilizer and some organic fertilizer applications on all other traits examined in peas were statistically significant. According to the results of the research, the number of branches in pea plants was 3.18 pieces/plant (control) and 4.13 pieces/plant (chemical fertilizer), plant height was 45.89 cm (sheep manure) and 49.51 cm (chemical fertilizer), the number of pods was 14.31 pieces/plant (control) and 25.90 pieces/plant (chemical fertilizer), the number of grains in pods was 4.90 pieces (control) and 6.64 pieces (chemical fertilizer), the number of grains per plant was 70. 03 (control) to 172.20 (chemical fertilizer), hundred seed weight 29.30 g (control) to 33.22 g (chemical fertilizer), grain yield 128.75 kg da-1 (control) to 300.38 kg da-1 (chemical fertilizer), protein content 22.49% (control) to 23.12% (sheep manure) and protein yield 28.96 kg da-1 (control) to 67.91 kg da-1 (chemical fertilizer). The responses of genotypes to organic fertilizer applications showed differences. As a result, it was determined that organic fertilization in peas gave less grain yield than those grown with chemical fertilization, but protein content had higher values. This showed that organic fertilization is a sustainable and environmentally friendly option for pea cultivation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chemical and some organic fertilizer applications significantly affected the examined pea traits.

Treatment
chemical fertilizer and some organic fertilizer applicationse0
Outcome
all other traits examinede0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effects of chemical fertilizer and some organic fertilizer applications on all other traits examined in peas were statistically significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1043–1186 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chemical fertilizer gave 4.13 branches per plant versus 3.18 in control.

Treatment
chemical fertilizere0
Outcome
number of branchese0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
4.13 pieces/plante0
Qualifier
3.18 pieces/plante0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the number of branches in pea plants was 3.18 pieces/plant (control) and 4.13 pieces/plant (chemical fertilizer)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1230–1342 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chemical fertilizer gave 49.51 cm plant height versus 45.89 cm with sheep manure.

Treatment
chemical fertilizere0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
49.51 cme0
Qualifier
45.89 cme0
Comparator
sheep manuree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant height was 45.89 cm (sheep manure) and 49.51 cm (chemical fertilizer)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1344–1419 · show in text ↑
t0

“pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chemical fertilizer gave 25.90 pods per plant versus 14.31 in control.

Treatment
chemical fertilizere0
Outcome
number of podse0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
25.90 pieces/plante0
Qualifier
14.31 pieces/plante0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the number of pods was 14.31 pieces/plant (control) and 25.90 pieces/plant (chemical fertilizer)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1421–1517 · show in text ↑
t0

“pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chemical fertilizer gave 6.64 grains per pod versus 4.90 in control.

Treatment
chemical fertilizere0
Outcome
number of grains in podse0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
6.64 piecese0
Qualifier
4.90 piecese0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the number of grains in pods was 4.90 pieces (control) and 6.64 pieces (chemical fertilizer)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1519–1611 · show in text ↑
t0

“pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chemical fertilizer gave 172.20 grains per plant versus 70. 03 in control.

Treatment
chemical fertilizere0
Outcome
number of grains per plante0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
172.20e0
Qualifier
70. 03e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the number of grains per plant was 70. 03 (control) to 172.20 (chemical fertilizer)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1613–1696 · show in text ↑
t0

“pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chemical fertilizer gave a hundred seed weight of 33.22 g versus 29.30 g in control.

Treatment
chemical fertilizere0
Outcome
hundred seed weighte0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
33.22 ge0
Qualifier
29.30 ge0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“hundred seed weight 29.30 g (control) to 33.22 g (chemical fertilizer)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1698–1768 · show in text ↑
t0

“pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chemical fertilizer gave grain yield of 300.38 kg da-1 versus 128.75 kg da-1 in control.

Treatment
chemical fertilizere0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
300.38 kg da-1e0
Qualifier
128.75 kg da-1e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain yield 128.75 kg da-1 (control) to 300.38 kg da-1 (chemical fertilizer)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1770–1846 · show in text ↑
t0

“pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sheep manure gave 23.12% protein content versus 22.49% in control.

Treatment
sheep manuree0
Outcome
protein contente0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
23.12%e0
Qualifier
22.49%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“protein content 22.49% (control) to 23.12% (sheep manure)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1848–1905 · show in text ↑
t0

“pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chemical fertilizer gave protein yield of 67.91 kg da-1 versus 28.96 kg da-1 in control.

Treatment
chemical fertilizere0
Outcome
protein yielde0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
67.91 kg da-1e0
Qualifier
28.96 kg da-1e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“protein yield 28.96 kg da-1 (control) to 67.91 kg da-1 (chemical fertilizer)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1910–1986 · show in text ↑
t0

“pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–126 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pea genotypes differed in response to organic fertilizers.

Material
genotypese0
Treatment
organic fertilizer applicationse0
Outcome
responses of genotypese0
Direction
differencese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The responses of genotypes to organic fertilizer applications showed differences.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1988–2069 · show in text ↑
t0

“pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic fertilization gave less pea grain yield than chemical fertilization.

Treatment
organic fertilizatione0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
chemical fertilizatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“organic fertilization in peas gave less grain yield than those grown with chemical fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2106–2202 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic fertilization gave higher pea protein content than chemical fertilization.

Treatment
organic fertilizatione0
Outcome
protein contente0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
chemical fertilizatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“organic fertilization in peas gave less grain yield than those grown with chemical fertilization, but protein content had higher values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2106–2241 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors regarded organic fertilization as a sustainable and environmentally friendly option for pea cultivation.

Treatment
organic fertilizatione0
Outcome
sustainable and environmentally friendly optione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“organic fertilization is a sustainable and environmentally friendly option for pea cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2260–2354 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: protein · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results differ

27 papers: 26 positive, 1 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

fertilization · growth · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

97 papers: 86 positive, 11 negative or no effect

85 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

93 papers more in this group

See all 97 papers →

fertilization · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

240 papers: 216 positive, 24 negative or no effect

215 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

236 papers more in this group

See all 240 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.