Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Liquid organo-mineral fertilizers increased winter pea yield by 0–30.4%, depending on weather.

A claim from Liquid organic-mineral fertilisers in the technology of growing winter peas · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Liquid organo-mineral fertilizers increased winter pea yield by 0–30.4%, depending on weather.

Taxon
winter peaLathyrus oleraceuse0
Treatment
liquid organo-mineral fertiliserse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
0-30.4%e0
Qualifier
depends on weather conditionse0
Comparator
control variante1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the use of liquid organo-mineral fertilisers on winter pea crops helps to increase its yield, but the growth rate is unstable, depends on weather conditions, and ranged within 0-30.4% over the years of research.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1273
e1

“the control variant did not involve the application of preparations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1043

Title

Liquid organic-mineral fertilisers in the technology of growing winter peas

Svitlana Burykina; Mykola Zhuk; Oleksandr Melnyk; et al. Scientific Horizons 2024. doi:10.48077/scihor7.2024.75

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-cd8dcd2ed7ef0df314beb3747de0395e3036d830a049c4ffc9437eff00d7ab03 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

fertilization · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

240 papers: 216 positive, 24 negative or no effect

215 papers in the same direction as this claim · 23 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

231 papers more in this group

See all 240 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.