Abstract
The article highlights the results of studying the impact of foliar fertilization with microfertilizers “Nanomix”, “Rostock”, “Reacom”, “Kvantum”, bacterial preparations “Azotofit”, “Phytocid”, “Biocomplex-BTU” and “Organic- balance"”on the yield of peas Oplot. The field research was conducted under the conditions of the educational-scientific and practical center of Mykolaiv National Agrarian University of the Southern Steppe Zone of Ukraine. The soil of the experimental field is the southern blacksoil of medium-loamy weakly saline. For pea sowing, grainy sowing was used СЗ-3,6 ASTRA with a sowing rate of 220 kg/ha (800000 pieces of germinating seeds per 1 hectare). The depth of seed seeding was – 5-6 cm. Seeds treated with Vitavax200 FF disinfectant (2.5-3 l / t) were used for sowing. Different variants of applying preparations in the phase of branching, budding and joint processing of plants have been researched. The efficiency of foliar fertilization preparations on the formation of pea yield has been analysed. The maximum yield of peas was formed using foliar fertilization with microfertilizer Nanomix in the phase of branching and budding in conjunction with the biological product Organic-balance and was 2.74 t / ha. With the use of biologicals on the background of microfertilizer Nanomix, the best option for the formation of crop yields of peas (2.56 t / ha) was foliar feeding in the branching phase + budding phase. By factor B, the best option was fertilization with Nanomix in the branching phase + budding phase, with a yield of 2.63 t / ha, and among the biological products for foliar feeding was Organic Balance, which formed an average yield of 2.58 t / ha. Our calculated polynomial correlation-regression dependences of pea yield on the use of Nnomix microfertilizer and biological preparations at different phases of plant treatment have showed that there is a very strong relationship between these formulations, which have been taken for the research and the yield. The coefficient of determination (R2) ranges from 0.651 to 0.940 with the use of Azotofit, from 0.658 to 0.903 - Phytocid, from 0.687 to 0.706 - Biocomplex and from 0.922 to 0.956 - Organic balance varies from 0.651 to 0.956, which is on a scale Cheddock characterized by such a statistical relationship as medium and strong. As a result of our research on the use of preparations and microfertilizers for foliar feeding of vegetative pea plants in different phases of its growth, the best options were using microfertilizers Reacom and Kvantum in the branching phase and the tank mixture of microfertilizers Reacom and Kvantum with Biocomplex-BTU and Organic balance in the budding phase. These options provided a pea yield of 2.86-2.91 t / ha.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
The maximum pea yield came from foliar Nanomix at branching and budding combined with Organic-balance.
- Taxon
- peas
Lathyrus oleraceuse0 - Material
- Oplote1
- Treatment
- foliar fertilization with microfertilizer Nanomix in the phase of branching and budding in conjunction with the biological product Organic-balancee0
- Outcome
- yield of pease0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 2.74 t / hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The maximum yield of peas was formed using foliar fertilization with microfertilizer Nanomix in the phase of branching and budding in conjunction with the biological product Organic-balance and was 2.74 t / ha”
e1“on the yield of peas Oplot”
Claim · model-written summary
With Nanomix on the background, foliar feeding at branching and budding gave the best crop yield of peas, 2.56 t / ha.
- Taxon
- peasLathyrus oleraceuse1
- Treatment
- foliar feeding in the branching phase + budding phasee1
- Outcome
- crop yields of pease1
- Direction
- best optione1
- Value
- 2.56 t / hae1
- Qualifier
- on the background of microfertilizer Nanomixe1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“With the use of biologicals on the background of microfertilizer Nanomix, the best option for the formation of crop yields of peas (2.56 t / ha) was foliar feeding in the branching phase + budding phase”
Claim · model-written summary
Nanomix fertilization at branching and budding was the best factor B option, with a pea yield of 2.63 t / ha.
- Taxon
- peasLathyrus oleraceuse0
- Treatment
- fertilization with Nanomix in the branching phase + budding phasee2
- Outcome
- yielde2
- Direction
- best optione2
- Value
- 2.63 t / hae2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The maximum yield of peas was formed using foliar fertilization with microfertilizer Nanomix in the phase of branching and budding in conjunction with the biological product Organic-balance and was 2.74 t / ha”
e2“By factor B, the best option was fertilization with Nanomix in the branching phase + budding phase, with a yield of 2.63 t / ha”
Claim · model-written summary
Organic Balance gave the highest average pea yield among the biological foliar products, 2.58 t / ha.
- Taxon
- peasLathyrus oleraceuse0
- Treatment
- Organic Balancee3
- Outcome
- average yielde3
- Direction
- higherinferrede3
- Value
- 2.58 t / hae3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The maximum yield of peas was formed using foliar fertilization with microfertilizer Nanomix in the phase of branching and budding in conjunction with the biological product Organic-balance and was 2.74 t / ha”
e3“among the biological products for foliar feeding was Organic Balance, which formed an average yield of 2.58 t / ha”
Claim · model-written summary
Polynomial regression of pea yield on Azotofit use had a coefficient of determination of 0.651 to 0.940.
- Taxon
- peasLathyrus oleraceuse0
- Treatment
- Azotofite4
- Outcome
- coefficient of determination (R2)e4
- Value
- 0.651 to 0.940e4
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The maximum yield of peas was formed using foliar fertilization with microfertilizer Nanomix in the phase of branching and budding in conjunction with the biological product Organic-balance and was 2.74 t / ha”
e4“The coefficient of determination (R2) ranges from 0.651 to 0.940 with the use of Azotofit”
Claim · model-written summary
Regression of pea yield on Organic balance use had a coefficient of determination of 0.651 to 0.956.
- Taxon
- peasLathyrus oleraceuse0
- Treatment
- Organic balancee6
- Outcome
- coefficient of determination (R2)e4
- Value
- 0.651 to 0.956e5
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The maximum yield of peas was formed using foliar fertilization with microfertilizer Nanomix in the phase of branching and budding in conjunction with the biological product Organic-balance and was 2.74 t / ha”
e4“The coefficient of determination (R2) ranges from 0.651 to 0.940 with the use of Azotofit”
e5“varies from 0.651 to 0.956”
e6“the tank mixture of microfertilizers Reacom and Kvantum with Biocomplex-BTU and Organic balance in the budding phase”
Claim · model-written summary
Reacom and Kvantum used at branching gave the best pea yield, 2.86-2.91 t / ha.
- Taxon
- peasLathyrus oleraceuse0
- Treatment
- using microfertilizers Reacom and Kvantum in the branching phasee6
- Outcome
- pea yielde7
- Direction
- best optionse6
- Value
- 2.86-2.91 t / hae7
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The maximum yield of peas was formed using foliar fertilization with microfertilizer Nanomix in the phase of branching and budding in conjunction with the biological product Organic-balance and was 2.74 t / ha”
e6“the best options were using microfertilizers Reacom and Kvantum in the branching phase and the tank mixture of microfertilizers Reacom and Kvantum with Biocomplex-BTU and Organic balance in the budding phase”
e7“These options provided a pea yield of 2.86-2.91 t / ha”
Claim · model-written summary
The Reacom and Kvantum tank mixture with Biocomplex-BTU and Organic balance at budding gave the best pea yield, 2.86-2.91 t / ha.
- Taxon
- peasLathyrus oleraceuse0
- Treatment
- the tank mixture of microfertilizers Reacom and Kvantum with Biocomplex-BTU and Organic balance in the budding phasee6
- Outcome
- pea yielde7
- Direction
- best optionse6
- Value
- 2.86-2.91 t / hae7
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The maximum yield of peas was formed using foliar fertilization with microfertilizer Nanomix in the phase of branching and budding in conjunction with the biological product Organic-balance and was 2.74 t / ha”
e6“the best options were using microfertilizers Reacom and Kvantum in the branching phase and the tank mixture of microfertilizers Reacom and Kvantum with Biocomplex-BTU and Organic balance in the budding phase”
e7“These options provided a pea yield of 2.86-2.91 t / ha”
The same questions in other papers
micronutrient · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →application · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results
78 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
79 papers more in this group
See all 83 papers →fertilization · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results
215 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- no effect
236 papers more in this group
See all 240 papers →nanoparticle · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree
14 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
11 papers more in this group
See all 15 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.