Paper · 2023 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Impact of varying doses and application methods of metribuzin on productivity and profitability of wheat (Triticum aestivum) under different tillage systems

ISHA AHLAWAT; B R KAMBOJ; DHARAM BIR YADAV; et al.

6
claims
18
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

Addressing the imperative of aligning food production with the escalating global population necessitates the identification of sustainable land management strategies. In the Indo-Gangetic Plains of India, weed infestation causes a significant threat to wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) productivity. To address this concern, a field experiment was conducted during the winter (rabi) seasons of 2021–22 and 2022–23 at the research farm of CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Rice Research Station, Kaul, Haryana. The primary objective of this experiment was to assess the effects of varying doses and application methods of metribuzin on the productivity and profitability of wheat crop under zero and conventional tillage systems. Notably, the application of post-emergence (POE) metribuzin at a dose of 350 g/ha as a urea-mix broadcast at 35 days after sowing (DAS) in combination with pinoxaden (PDN) exhibited notablebenefits in terms of productivity and economic viability of wheat. This treatment yielded significantly higher number of effective tillers/mrl (111 in zero tillage; 112 in conventional tillage) and grain yield (5,573 kg/ha in zero tillage; 5,972 kg/ha in conventional tillage). Moreover, the treatment combination of metribuzin at 350 g/ha as a urea-mix broadcast and pinoxaden applied at 35 DAS resulted in the highest net returns and benefit-cost ratio under both tillage systems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Metribuzin plus pinoxaden produced a significantly higher effective tiller count under zero tillage.

Treatment
metribuzin at a dose of 350 g/ha as a urea-mix broadcast at 35 days after sowing (DAS) in combination with pinoxadene1
Outcome
number of effective tillers/mrle2
Direction
highere2
Value
111e2
Qualifier
zero tillagee2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 253–281 · show in text ↑
e1

“post-emergence (POE) metribuzin at a dose of 350 g/ha as a urea-mix broadcast at 35 days after sowing (DAS) in combination with pinoxaden”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–893 · show in text ↑
e2

“significantly higher number of effective tillers/mrl (111 in zero tillage; 112 in conventional tillage)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The same treatment produced a significantly higher effective tiller count under conventional tillage.

Treatment
metribuzin at a dose of 350 g/ha as a urea-mix broadcast at 35 days after sowing (DAS) in combination with pinoxadene1
Outcome
number of effective tillers/mrle2
Direction
highere2
Value
112e2
Qualifier
conventional tillagee2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 253–281 · show in text ↑
e1

“post-emergence (POE) metribuzin at a dose of 350 g/ha as a urea-mix broadcast at 35 days after sowing (DAS) in combination with pinoxaden”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–893 · show in text ↑
e2

“significantly higher number of effective tillers/mrl (111 in zero tillage; 112 in conventional tillage)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatment yielded significantly higher grain yield under zero tillage, at 5,573 kg/ha.

Treatment
metribuzin at a dose of 350 g/ha as a urea-mix broadcast at 35 days after sowing (DAS) in combination with pinoxadene1
Outcome
grain yielde2
Direction
highere3
Value
5,573 kg/hae2
Qualifier
zero tillagee2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 253–281 · show in text ↑
e1

“post-emergence (POE) metribuzin at a dose of 350 g/ha as a urea-mix broadcast at 35 days after sowing (DAS) in combination with pinoxaden”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–893 · show in text ↑
e2

“grain yield (5,573 kg/ha in zero tillage; 5,972 kg/ha in conventional tillage)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1115–1193 · show in text ↑
e3

“This treatment yielded significantly higher number of effective tillers/mrl”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1059 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatment yielded significantly higher grain yield under conventional tillage, at 5,972 kg/ha.

Treatment
metribuzin at a dose of 350 g/ha as a urea-mix broadcast at 35 days after sowing (DAS) in combination with pinoxadene1
Outcome
grain yielde2
Direction
highere3
Value
5,972 kg/hae2
Qualifier
conventional tillagee2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 253–281 · show in text ↑
e1

“post-emergence (POE) metribuzin at a dose of 350 g/ha as a urea-mix broadcast at 35 days after sowing (DAS) in combination with pinoxaden”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–893 · show in text ↑
e2

“grain yield (5,573 kg/ha in zero tillage; 5,972 kg/ha in conventional tillage)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1115–1193 · show in text ↑
e3

“This treatment yielded significantly higher number of effective tillers/mrl”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1059 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatment had the highest net returns under both tillage systems.

Treatment
metribuzin at 350 g/ha as a urea-mix broadcast and pinoxaden applied at 35 DASe1
Outcome
net returnse1
Direction
higheste1
Qualifier
both tillage systemse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 253–281 · show in text ↑
e1

“the treatment combination of metribuzin at 350 g/ha as a urea-mix broadcast and pinoxaden applied at 35 DAS resulted in the highest net returns and benefit-cost ratio under both tillage systems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1205–1399 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatment had the highest benefit-cost ratio under both tillage systems.

Treatment
metribuzin at 350 g/ha as a urea-mix broadcast and pinoxaden applied at 35 DASe1
Outcome
benefit-cost ratioe1
Direction
higheste1
Qualifier
both tillage systemse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 253–281 · show in text ↑
e1

“the treatment combination of metribuzin at 350 g/ha as a urea-mix broadcast and pinoxaden applied at 35 DAS resulted in the highest net returns and benefit-cost ratio under both tillage systems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1205–1399 · show in text ↑

pinoxaden · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

30 papers: 26 positive, 4 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

metribuzin · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

75 papers: 45 positive, 30 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

71 papers more in this group

See all 75 papers →

transplanting · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

176 papers: 129 positive, 47 negative or no effect

128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction · 12 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

172 papers more in this group

See all 176 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

1,736 papers in the same direction as this paper · 285 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.