Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The treatment yielded significantly higher grain yield under conventional tillage, at 5,972 kg/ha.

A claim from Impact of varying doses and application methods of metribuzin on productivity and profitability of wheat (Triticum aestivum) under different tillage systems · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatment yielded significantly higher grain yield under conventional tillage, at 5,972 kg/ha.

Treatment
metribuzin at a dose of 350 g/ha as a urea-mix broadcast at 35 days after sowing (DAS) in combination with pinoxadene1
Outcome
grain yielde2
Direction
highere3
Value
5,972 kg/hae2
Qualifier
conventional tillagee2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 253–281
e1

“post-emergence (POE) metribuzin at a dose of 350 g/ha as a urea-mix broadcast at 35 days after sowing (DAS) in combination with pinoxaden”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–893
e2

“grain yield (5,573 kg/ha in zero tillage; 5,972 kg/ha in conventional tillage)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1115–1193
e3

“This treatment yielded significantly higher number of effective tillers/mrl”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1059

Title

Impact of varying doses and application methods of metribuzin on productivity and profitability of wheat (Triticum aestivum) under different tillage systems

ISHA AHLAWAT; B R KAMBOJ; DHARAM BIR YADAV; et al. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2023. doi:10.56093/ijas.v93i8.138520

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-7823ab2ebcece8edf936aba42d5b7d4a24199f27bdfb5ce31663d3391681c0c3 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

pinoxaden · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

30 papers: 26 positive, 4 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

metribuzin · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

75 papers: 45 positive, 30 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this claim · 27 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

66 papers more in this group

See all 75 papers →

transplanting · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

176 papers: 129 positive, 47 negative or no effect

128 papers in the same direction as this claim · 35 in the opposite direction · 12 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

167 papers more in this group

See all 176 papers →

3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.