Paper · 2023 · Frontiers in Food Science and Technology

Influence of UV radiation-absorbing foils on secondary plant metabolites in three lettuce cultivars (Lactuca sativa L. and Cichorium intybus L.)

Nikola Laurenčíková; Marek Živčák; Susanne Neugart; et al.

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Introduction: Providing fresh and healthy vegetables, produced locally and under climate-friendly conditions, is a major challenge for future agriculture. The usage of foil tunnels prolongs cultivation periods in colder climates and reduces abiotic and biotic stress factors during crop growth, but it may also affect nutritional value and consumer perception due to the altered light spectrum. Methods and results: Three different foils, one with low UV transmission, another with reduced UVB transmission, and a control foil with high UV transmission, were used to modulate light conditions for three different lettuce cultivars [radicchio type (cv. Indigo), romaine type (cv. Attico), and butterhead type (cv. Larissa)]. Taste-relevant sesquiterpene lactones and health-relevant carotenoids and polyphenols were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography, which revealed that light conditions are widely irrelevant for carotenoid concentrations. However, when UV-shielding foils were used, there was an up to 66% decrease in total polyphenol concentration. Less reduction could be achieved through the use of partially UV-transmissive foils. Sesquiterpene lactone concentrations were higher in plants under UV-blocking foils, when radicchio-type lettuce, naturally rich in sesquiterpene lactones, was cultivated. Discussion: It is noteworthy that the sesquiterpene lactone lactucopicrin had a negative correlation with UVB intensities, while lactucin was unaffected. The nutritional value, measured by three different antioxidant activity assays, also benefited from an optimized foil choice with higher UV transmission.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light conditions had little effect on carotenoid concentrations.

Taxon
lettuce cultivarsLactuca sativat0
Treatment
light conditionse0
Outcome
carotenoid concentrationse0
Direction
widely irrelevante0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“light conditions are widely irrelevant for carotenoid concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–955 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce cultivars (Lactuca sativa L. and Cichorium intybus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–144 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-shielding foils reduced total polyphenol concentration by up to 66%.

Taxon
lettuce cultivarsLactuca sativat0
Treatment
UV-shielding foilse0
Outcome
total polyphenol concentratione0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
up to 66%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“when UV-shielding foils were used, there was an up to 66% decrease in total polyphenol concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 966–1066 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce cultivars (Lactuca sativa L. and Cichorium intybus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–144 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Partially UV-transmissive foils yielded less polyphenol reduction.

Taxon
lettuce cultivarsLactuca sativat0
Treatment
partially UV-transmissive foilse0
Outcome
total polyphenol concentratione1
Direction
Less reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Less reduction could be achieved through the use of partially UV-transmissive foils.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1152 · show in text ↑
e1

“total polyphenol concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1036–1066 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce cultivars (Lactuca sativa L. and Cichorium intybus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–144 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-blocking foils increased sesquiterpene lactone concentrations in radicchio-type lettuce.

Taxon
lettuce cultivarsLactuca sativat0
Material
radicchio-type lettucee0
Treatment
UV-blocking foilse0
Outcome
Sesquiterpene lactone concentrationse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sesquiterpene lactone concentrations were higher in plants under UV-blocking foils, when radicchio-type lettuce, naturally rich in sesquiterpene lactones, was cultivated.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1153–1323 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–99 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lactucopicrin concentration was negatively correlated with UVB intensity.

Taxon
lettuce cultivarsLactuca sativat0
Treatment
UVB intensitiese0
Outcome
lactucopicrine0
Direction
negative correlatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lactucopicrin had a negative correlation with UVB intensities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1384–1445 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–99 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lactucin was unaffected by UVB intensity.

Taxon
lettuce cultivarsLactuca sativat0
Treatment
UVB intensitiese0
Outcome
lactucine0
Direction
unaffectede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lactucopicrin had a negative correlation with UVB intensities, while lactucin was unaffected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1384–1476 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher UV transmission improved antioxidant activity across three assays.

Taxon
lettuce cultivarsLactuca sativat0
Treatment
optimized foil choice with higher UV transmissione0
Outcome
antioxidant activitye0
Direction
benefitede0
Qualifier
three different antioxidant activity assayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The nutritional value, measured by three different antioxidant activity assays, also benefited from an optimized foil choice with higher UV transmission.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1478–1631 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–99 · show in text ↑

uv · quality: phytochemicals · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Results differ

28 papers: 24 positive, 4 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

light · physiology: pigments · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

52 papers: 44 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 44 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

48 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.