Paper · 2023 · Asian Journal of Biochemistry Genetics and Molecular Biology

Genotoxic and Cytotoxic Activities of Hippocratea africana Loes. Ex. Engl. Celastraceae Root Extract

Johnny, I. I.; Okokon, J. E.; Ochigbo, E. B.; et al.

5
claims
8
verbatim quotes
5
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Hippocratea africana, a medicinal plant, used in ethnomedicine for the treatment of antimalarial, diabetes, poisoning and inflammatory diseases was investigated for cytotoxic and genotoxic effects on the root meristem cells of Allium cepa. The extract and fractions was also screened for total flavonoid and phenol content using standard methods. Onion bulbs were exposed to 2.5 mg/ml, 5mg/ml, and 10 mg/ml concentrations of the leaf extract for macroscopic and microscopic analysis. Tap water was used as a negative control and Methotrexate (0.1 mg/ml) as a positive control. There was statistically significant (P < 0.05) inhibition of root growth depending on concentration by the extract when compared with the negative control group. All the tested concentrations of the extract were observed to have cytotoxic effects on cell division in A. cepa. The extract- induced chromosomal aberrations and micronuclei (MNC) formations in A. cepa root tip cells and were significant (p<0.05) when compared with control group. The extract treatment further induced cell death, ghost cells, cells membrane damage, and binucleated cells. These results suggest that Hippocratea africana root extract possess cytotoxic and genotoxic effects on A. cepa which is as a results of its phytochemical constituents.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Extract inhibited onion root growth with concentration dependence.

Taxon
Allium cepaAllium cepae1
Treatment
extracte0
Outcome
root growthe0
Direction
inhibitione0
Qualifier
depending on concentratione0
Comparator
negative control groupe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was statistically significant (P < 0.05) inhibition of root growth depending on concentration by the extract when compared with the negative control group.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 577–738 · show in text ↑
e1

“root meristem cells of Allium cepa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 204–238 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Every tested extract concentration had cytotoxic effects on onion cell division.

Taxon
A. cepaAllium cepae0
Treatment
extracte0
Outcome
cell divisione0
Direction
cytotoxic effectse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All the tested concentrations of the extract were observed to have cytotoxic effects on cell division in A. cepa.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 739–852 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Extract induced significant chromosomal aberrations and micronuclei in onion root tips.

Taxon
A. cepaAllium cepae0
Organ / stage
root tip cellse0
Treatment
extracte0
Outcome
chromosomal aberrations and micronuclei (MNC) formationse0
Direction
inducede0
Comparator
control groupe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The extract- induced chromosomal aberrations and micronuclei (MNC) formations in A. cepa root tip cells and were significant (p<0.05) when compared with control group.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–1020 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Extract induced cell death, ghost cells and membrane damage.

Taxon
Allium cepaAllium cepae1
Treatment
extract treatmente0
Outcome
cell death, ghost cells, cells membrane damagee0
Direction
inducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The extract treatment further induced cell death, ghost cells, cells membrane damage, and binucleated cells.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1129 · show in text ↑
e1

“root meristem cells of Allium cepa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 204–238 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Extract induced binucleated cells.

Taxon
Allium cepaAllium cepae1
Treatment
extract treatmente0
Outcome
binucleated cellse0
Direction
inducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The extract treatment further induced cell death, ghost cells, cells membrane damage, and binucleated cells.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1129 · show in text ↑
e1

“root meristem cells of Allium cepa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 204–238 · show in text ↑

botanical · physiology: oxidative · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 10 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

botanical · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

89 papers: 37 positive, 52 negative or no effect

51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 37 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

85 papers more in this group

See all 89 papers →

botanical · cytology · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

116 papers: 26 positive, 90 negative or no effect

89 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

112 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.