Paper · 2023 · International Journal of Agriculture Environment and Food Sciences

Determination of the tolerance of physiological, morphological, and yield parameters of landrace durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) to high-temperature stress

Mustafa OKAN; Aydın ALP; Kamil HALİLOĞLU

13
claims
43
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

In the South-eastern Anatolia Region, where the climate is favorable to cultivation for durum wheat, there have been notable reductions in both yield and quality due to biotic and abiotic stress factors in the region. Primary one of these stresses is high-temperature stress. High-temperature stress, specifically during the late flowering stage and early grain filling stage, results in substantial reductions in both crop yield and quality. In this study, several practical, easily and rapidly quantifiable physiological, morphological, and yield-related parameters that may be used in durum wheat improvement programs in the region for high-temperature stress tolerance were investigated. Ninety landrace durum genotypes and 4 standard cultivars were used. The study was carried out at GAP (South-eastern Anatolia Project) International Agricultural Research and Training Centre in an air conditioning room according to an augmented design under optimum conditions and stressful conditions where high-temperature stress was created. Compared to optimum conditions, there were reductions in flag leaf greening time by 20%, days to maturity by 7%, spike length by 10%, peduncle length by 18%, grain filling time by 23%, number of spikelets on the spike by 12%, number of grains on the spike by 39%, and thousand-kernel weight by 33%, while grain filling rate increased under high-temperature stress conditions. The genotypes 82, 83, 87, 88, 99, and 103 and the standard varieties Artuklu and Sümerli prevailed in both optimum and stress conditions. The fact that leaf erectness, flag leaf greening time, grain filling time, and leaf chlorophyll content among morphological and physiological characteristics had a significant correlation with yield components under both conditions indicates that these characteristics can be used as selection criteria for tolerance to stressful conditions in the region.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High temperature reduced flag leaf greening time by 20%.

Treatment
high-temperature stresse2
Outcome
flag leaf greening timee0
Direction
reductionse1
Value
20%e0
Comparator
optimum conditionse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–108 · show in text ↑
e0

“flag leaf greening time by 20%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1093–1123 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared to optimum conditions, there were reductions in”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1036–1092 · show in text ↑
e2

“high-temperature stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1376–1410 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High temperature reduced days to maturity by 7%.

Treatment
high-temperature stresse2
Outcome
days to maturitye0
Direction
reductionse1
Value
7%e0
Comparator
optimum conditionse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–108 · show in text ↑
e0

“days to maturity by 7%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1125–1147 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared to optimum conditions, there were reductions in”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1036–1092 · show in text ↑
e2

“high-temperature stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1376–1410 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High temperature reduced spike length by 10%.

Treatment
high-temperature stresse2
Outcome
spike lengthe0
Direction
reductionse1
Value
10%e0
Comparator
optimum conditionse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–108 · show in text ↑
e0

“spike length by 10%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1149–1168 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared to optimum conditions, there were reductions in”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1036–1092 · show in text ↑
e2

“high-temperature stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1376–1410 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High temperature reduced peduncle length by 18%.

Treatment
high-temperature stresse2
Outcome
peduncle lengthe0
Direction
reductionse1
Value
18%e0
Comparator
optimum conditionse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–108 · show in text ↑
e0

“peduncle length by 18%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1170–1192 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared to optimum conditions, there were reductions in”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1036–1092 · show in text ↑
e2

“high-temperature stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1376–1410 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High temperature reduced grain filling time by 23%.

Treatment
high-temperature stresse2
Outcome
grain filling timee0
Direction
reductionse1
Value
23%e0
Comparator
optimum conditionse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–108 · show in text ↑
e0

“grain filling time by 23%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1194–1219 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared to optimum conditions, there were reductions in”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1036–1092 · show in text ↑
e2

“high-temperature stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1376–1410 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High temperature reduced number of spikelets on the spike by 12%.

Treatment
high-temperature stresse2
Outcome
number of spikelets on the spikee0
Direction
reductionse1
Value
12%e0
Comparator
optimum conditionse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–108 · show in text ↑
e0

“number of spikelets on the spike by 12%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1221–1260 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared to optimum conditions, there were reductions in”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1036–1092 · show in text ↑
e2

“high-temperature stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1376–1410 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High temperature reduced number of grains on the spike by 39%.

Treatment
high-temperature stresse2
Outcome
number of grains on the spikee0
Direction
reductionse1
Value
39%e0
Comparator
optimum conditionse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–108 · show in text ↑
e0

“number of grains on the spike by 39%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1262–1298 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared to optimum conditions, there were reductions in”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1036–1092 · show in text ↑
e2

“high-temperature stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1376–1410 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High temperature reduced thousand-kernel weight by 33%.

Treatment
high-temperature stresse2
Outcome
thousand-kernel weighte0
Direction
reductionse1
Value
33%e0
Comparator
optimum conditionse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–108 · show in text ↑
e0

“thousand-kernel weight by 33%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1304–1333 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared to optimum conditions, there were reductions in”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1036–1092 · show in text ↑
e2

“high-temperature stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1376–1410 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain filling rate increased under high temperature.

Treatment
high-temperature stress conditionse0
Outcome
grain filling ratee0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
optimum conditionse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–108 · show in text ↑
e0

“grain filling rate increased under high-temperature stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1341–1410 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared to optimum conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1036–1066 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotypes 82, 83, 87, 88, 99, and 103 prevailed in both conditions.

Material
82, 83, 87, 88, 99, and 103e0
Outcome
prevailed in both optimum and stress conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–108 · show in text ↑
e0

“The genotypes 82, 83, 87, 88, 99, and 103 and the standard varieties Artuklu and Sümerli prevailed in both optimum and stress conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1412–1549 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Artuklu and Sümerli prevailed in both conditions.

Material
Artuklu and Sümerlie0
Outcome
prevailed in both optimum and stress conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–108 · show in text ↑
e0

“the standard varieties Artuklu and Sümerli prevailed in both optimum and stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1458–1548 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf erectness, flag leaf greening time, grain filling time, and chlorophyll content correlated significantly with yield components under both conditions.

Organ / stage
leafe0
Outcome
yield componentse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–108 · show in text ↑
e0

“leaf erectness, flag leaf greening time, grain filling time, and leaf chlorophyll content among morphological and physiological characteristics had a significant correlation with yield components under both conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1564–1781 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose these correlated traits as heat-tolerance selection criteria.

Outcome
selection criteria for tolerance to stressful conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–108 · show in text ↑
e0

“these characteristics can be used as selection criteria for tolerance to stressful conditions in the region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1797–1904 · show in text ↑

heat · yield · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 2 positive, 5 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.