Paper · 2023 · Asian Journal of Research in Agriculture and Forestry

Enhancing Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Tolerance to Salinity through Plant Growth Regulators

Hasib Bin Saif; Nadira Mokarroma; Kanis Fatema Ruma; et al.

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

During the period of 2020-21, a research study was carried out at the Plant Protective Culture Unit within the semi-controlled environmental settings of the Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute. The aim of the study was to mitigate the negative impacts of salinity stress on chickpea by applying various concentrations of salicylic acid (SA) and gibberellic acid (GA3). Plants were subjected to four different levels of salinity stress, including a control group, mild stress, moderate stress, and severe stress. This was achieved by irrigating them with four varying concentrations of saline water (5, 7.5, 10 and 12.5 dSm-1) starting from the 14th day after sowing (DAS) and continuing until maturity at 100 DAS. On the other hand, the control plants received regular irrigation with tap water. Two concentrations of salicylic acid (SA) specifically 200 ppm and 400 ppm, along with gibberellic acid (GA3) at 10 ppm and 20 ppm, were administered as a foliar spray once a week, commencing at 20 days after sowing (DAS) and continuing until the flowering stage. Data related to chlorophyll levels in the leaves and water-related traits, including relative water content (RWC) and water retention capacity (WRC) were collected seven days after the foliar spray of these plant growth regulators at the flowering stage. Additionally, measurements of total dry weight, yield, and various yield-contributing factors were taken at the point of maturity. The results indicated that chickpea suffered adverse consequences due to salinity stress which included a reduction in chlorophyll content, a decrease in relative water content, a decline in water retention capacity, a decrease in total dry weight and a lower overall yield. However, the foliar application of different doses of salicylic acid (SA) and gibberellic acid (GA3) under varying levels of salinity stress had beneficial effects in alleviating the impact of salinity stress. Interestingly, it was observed that lower concentrations of SA at 200 ppm and GA3 at 10 ppm were more effective in mitigating the adverse effects of salinity stress and improving salinity tolerance in chickpea, especially under mild salinity stress conditions (5 dSm-1) as evidenced by the positive influence on the parameters mentioned above.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity reduced chickpea chlorophyll content, relative water content and water retention capacity.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
salinity stresse0
Outcome
chlorophyll content, a decrease in relative water content, a decline in water retention capacitye0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“salinity stress which included a reduction in chlorophyll content, a decrease in relative water content, a decline in water retention capacity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1526–1668 · show in text ↑
e1

“salinity stress on chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 262–289 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity reduced total dry weight and yield.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume2
Treatment
salinity stresse1
Outcome
total dry weight and a lower overall yielde0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a decrease in total dry weight and a lower overall yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1670–1726 · show in text ↑
e1

“salinity stress on chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 262–289 · show in text ↑
e2

“salinity tolerance in chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2117–2147 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar gibberellic acid alleviated salinity impact, with 10 ppm most effective under mild stress.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
GA3 at 10 ppme0
Outcome
salinity tolerancee0
Direction
improvinge0
Qualifier
mild salinity stress conditions (5 dSm-1)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lower concentrations of SA at 200 ppm and GA3 at 10 ppm were more effective in mitigating the adverse effects of salinity stress and improving salinity tolerance in chickpea, especially under mild salinity stress conditions (5 dSm-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1974–2207 · show in text ↑

salinity · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 4 positive, 23 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

salinity · physiology: water · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

23 papers: 0 positive, 23 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.